STAT

Opinion: Delays in adding new newborn screening tests harm babies, families

Newborn screening programs save lives, prevent serious injury to thousands of infants each year. It shouldn't take so long for new tests to be added to them.
Blood samples collected from a newborn to screen for serious inherited diseases.

Individuals with genetic diseases often face an excruciatingly long diagnostic odyssey. Between the time they first experience symptoms and the time they get a definitive diagnosis, some see the disease progress, others suffer irreversible damage, and many may experience significantly decreased quality of life. By identifying some of these diseases very early in life, newborn screening programs save and improve the lives of thousands of infants in the U.S. every year.

State-run screening programs can identify many affected individuals at birth, but their fragmented nature and delays in incorporating new tests results in unnecessary suffering for children born with addressable disorders who go undiagnosed because they are born in states that move slowly to adopt screening tests.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT1 min readIntelligence (AI) & Semantics
STAT+: Q&A: Defining Responsible AI In Health Care, With CHAI CEO Brian Anderson
CHAI CEO Anderson wants to build public trust in AI and empower patients and providers to have more informed conversations.
STAT1 min read
STAT+: Oncologists Turn To Blood Test For Circulating Tumor DNA, But Questions Remain On How To Use The Data
A blood test known as a ctDNA test can be a good indicator of whether someone's cancer will return after surgery. But the test doesn't always clarify the next step…
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About A Merck Pneumococcal Shot, Kansas Suing Pfizer, And More
In today's Pharmalittle roundup, we're reading about a Merck pneumococcal shot, Kansas suing Pfizer, and more.

Related Books & Audiobooks