STAT

‘I really don’t know what happened to Jim’: Friends ask where James Watson’s odious attitudes about race came from

Watson saw his double-helix discovery as proof of his view that intuition and opposing the establishment consensus are stronger guides to truth than empirical research.

Even before a documentary on biologist James Watson aired on Wednesday night as part of PBS’s “American Masters” series, social media was aflame with protests from scientists and others about its very existence: After Watson’s many statements denigrating blacks, women, and others, it is more than time for the media to “move on,” one biologist tweeted. Another protested giving oxygen to Watson’s “infuriating” and “unfounded comments about race,” while a biologist at the institution Watson ran for nearly 40 years decried his “racist bull—-” and “the harm it does to our science.”

Watson’s many odious comments over the decades might be blamed on age (he is 90), or irascibility, or a privileged white man’s raging at a world that no longer winks at  like “some anti-Semitism is justified.” But in interviews with STAT, longtime friends offered another explanation for

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT1 min readIntelligence (AI) & Semantics
STAT+: Q&A: Defining Responsible AI In Health Care, With CHAI CEO Brian Anderson
CHAI CEO Anderson wants to build public trust in AI and empower patients and providers to have more informed conversations.
STAT1 min read
STAT+: Oncologists Turn To Blood Test For Circulating Tumor DNA, But Questions Remain On How To Use The Data
A blood test known as a ctDNA test can be a good indicator of whether someone's cancer will return after surgery. But the test doesn't always clarify the next step…
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About A Merck Pneumococcal Shot, Kansas Suing Pfizer, And More
In today's Pharmalittle roundup, we're reading about a Merck pneumococcal shot, Kansas suing Pfizer, and more.

Related Books & Audiobooks