STAT

Opinion: Fixing health care’s replication crisis is important for researchers and patients

We are awash in reports of new study results, from a potential cure for an illness or the latest take on what makes a healthy diet. But are we getting…

We are awash in articles reporting new study results. Whether it’s a potential cure for an illness, daunting statistics about health care outcomes, or the latest take on what makes a healthy diet, we’re receiving more information than we’ve ever had before nudging us toward making decisions about our health.

But are we getting accurate information?

Dr. John Ioannidis, a statistician and professor of medicine at Stanford, recently joined three dozen health researchers in a Stanford lecture hall to explain why most research findings are false. Of the most widely cited health research studies of the last decade, he found that could be replicated, and by later studies.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT1 min readIntelligence (AI) & Semantics
STAT+: Q&A: Defining Responsible AI In Health Care, With CHAI CEO Brian Anderson
CHAI CEO Anderson wants to build public trust in AI and empower patients and providers to have more informed conversations.
STAT1 min read
STAT+: Oncologists Turn To Blood Test For Circulating Tumor DNA, But Questions Remain On How To Use The Data
A blood test known as a ctDNA test can be a good indicator of whether someone's cancer will return after surgery. But the test doesn't always clarify the next step…
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About A Merck Pneumococcal Shot, Kansas Suing Pfizer, And More
In today's Pharmalittle roundup, we're reading about a Merck pneumococcal shot, Kansas suing Pfizer, and more.

Related Books & Audiobooks