Foreign Policy Magazine

Party Animals

More than half a decade of intense debate on what is now routinely referred to as a crisis of democracy hasn’t produced much in the way of remedies. It has clarified, however, intellectual and political battle lines. On one side are the so-called institutionalists: scholars and politicians who aim to defend existing democratic bodies, such as independent courts, against all manner of wreckers and norm-breakers. On the other side are those who see such institutionalists as complacent defenders of a pre-crisis status quo that cannot—and should not—be restored. Two note-worthy recent books on threats to democracy both fall into the institutionalist camp but still offer very different answers to the question of how best to defend and, ideally, deepen democracy: One looks mainly to the rule of law, while the other gestures at transformations of party politics.

Allan J. Lichtman, a well-known scholar of U.S. political history, focuses on the troubles at home. Partly because U.S. President Donald Trump was so savvy at—to borrow a phrase from his onetime strategist Steve Bannon—“flood[ing] the zone with shit,” one might easily forget many of his seemingly endless scandals, misdemeanors, and violations of even the most basic precepts of political ethics. Lichtman’s new book, Thirteen Cracks: Repairing American Democracy After Trump, helpfully groups these various breaches together in separate categories in order to identify 13 particularly vulnerable points in American democracy, or what he calls “cracks,” in language echoed by Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, who worries about “how ruinous these cracks in our democratic foundation can be.”

Lichtman’s book reads like an exercise in Trump detox. In 13 concise chapters, he offers to patch the cracks he identifies with various forms of—well, pick whatever metaphor might fit—caulking, dry wall, bricks and mortar, or something stronger still. The fact that he advertises his remedies as “simple, quick, and practical” would appear to suggest caulking.

Yet fixing institutions, for Lichtman, often

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Foreign Policy Magazine

Foreign Policy Magazine6 min readInternational Relations
The Biden Doctrine Will Make Things Worse
Does the United States need a “Biden Doctrine for the Middle East”? I ask because Thomas Friedman laid it out in the New York Times in late January. Apparently, the Biden administration is prepared to take a “strong and resolute stand on Iran,” advan
Foreign Policy Magazine6 min readWorld
Ukraine Isn’t Just Putin’s War
For years, as Moscow’s intent to challenge the West became clearer, a key question loomed: whether the country as a whole or its leader was at fault—in effect, whether the world had a Russia problem or a Putin problem. Since the full-scale invasion o
Foreign Policy Magazine8 min readInternational Relations
What South Africa Really Won at the ICJ
For those with long memories, the seed of South Africa’s case against Israel—accusing it of genocidal acts in the Gaza Strip—might be traced to a spring day nearly 50 years ago. On April 9, 1976, South Africa’s white supremacist prime minister, Balth

Related