Zora Neale Hurston’s Inconvenient Individualism
![f0052-01](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/6iylp7qh4w9qzact/images/fileWEUFC9WT.jpg)
IN 1937 THE left-wing magazine New Masses ran a negative review of Zora Neale Hurston’s masterpiece, Their Eyes Were Watching God. “Miss Hurston can write,” allowed Richard Wright, whose own landmark novel, Native Son, would appear three years later. But her writing, he said, wallowed “in that facile sensuality that has dogged Negro expression.” Hurston’s novel “is not addressed to the Negro,” Wright asserted, “but to a white audience whose chauvinistic tastes she knows how to satisfy.” In effect, Wright accused Hurston of selling out the race by pandering to whites.
Wright could not have been more wrong. Hurston, a former student of the famed Columbia University anthropologist Franz Boas, had conducted extensive fieldwork throughout the American South, carefully noting (and delighting in) the various black cultures and dialects she encountered. That real-world language permeates her remarkable novel, nestled alongside sundry elements drawn from her own compelling life story, including her Southern upbringing, failed marriages, and searing love affair with a younger man. By attacking , Wright had actually disparaged the authentic, individualistic black voices
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days