Computeractive

Letters

Will we have to pay to use WhatsApp?

Following Meta’s decision to start charging for gimmicks such as verifying Facebook accounts and “increased visibility” (whatever that means), it occurs to me that their biggest cash cow might be WhatsApp. A quick Google search tells me it has more than 2 billion users. Charge them all £1.99 a month to use it and you’ve suddenly made a lot of money.

There are no adverts in WhatsApp – or if there are, I’ve never seen them. So it makes me wonder how Meta even makes money from it. I use it every day to organise club events, stay in touch with family and gossip with neighbours. I’m grateful that it’s still free, but if push came to shove I’d probably accept having to pay for it – not that I want to give Meta any ideas!

Sharon Biggs

We think Matthew (see Star Letter) and Sharon are right: as their advertising revenue dwindles, the tech giants will start to charge for more ‘premium’ features – one of which will

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Computeractive

Computeractive3 min read
Reader Support
Q In Issue 681’s Cover Feature on removing junk safely, you mentioned the WINDOWS.OLD directory (page 53), which is created after a re-installation. I’d counsel caution in deleting this until you’re happy with your new Windows installation and progra
Computeractive5 min read
Browser Tips
It’s hard to remember a time when Google presented its search results in a clean, minimalist way. Search for something these days, and your results include sponsored links, ads for related products on online stores, ‘people also ask’ suggestions and
Computeractive4 min read
Consumeractive
LEAD CASE Q In August 2022 I bought a £34.99 Kolink power supply unit from Currys. It stopped working in March, since when I’ve been ping-ponged between Currys and Kolink in Germany. It’s still under warranty, but Currys says this has nothing to do w

Related Books & Audiobooks