Los Angeles Times

Commentary: New Alzheimer’s drugs are costly and controversial. Are we going about this all wrong?

Eli Lilly’ s stock price jumped 6.7% after it announced positive results from a trial of one new Alzheimer’ s drug, increasing the company’ s value by more than $25 billion that day.

The Food and Drug Administration’s recent approval of new Alzheimer’s drugs sparked a flicker of hope for the millions affected by this devastating disease. But this progress casts a puzzling shadow.

The drugs come at a high cost for relatively limited benefits, offering only a brief respite in the pace of cognitive decline. This reality raises a question: Are we fixated on such marginally effective treatments at the expense of more promising preventive measures?

The pharmaceutical industry stands to profit substantially from these drugs, which promise to bring in billions. Eli Lilly’s stock price jumped 6.7% after it announced positive results from a trial of one

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times2 min read
Fever's Caitlin Clark Cuts Off Reporters For Ignoring Teammate Aliyah Boston At News Conference
How do you know when it’s the right time to pass? What’s the best advice that’s been given to you during a game? What do you hope your legacy or stamp on the game will be? How do you go about not allowing frustration to affect your relationships with
Los Angeles Times4 min readAmerican Government
Mark Z. Barabak: Biden Bumbles, Trump Lies And We All Lose
There were many firsts attending Thursday night's mud wrestle between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. It was the earliest presidential debate in history. The first between two candidates of such a ripe age. The only one ever pitting the occupant of the
Los Angeles Times3 min readCrime & Violence
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Enforce Laws Against Homeless Encampments
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Friday that cities in California and the West may enforce laws restricting homeless encampments on sidewalks and other public property. In a 6-3 decision, the justices disagreed with the the 9th Circuit Court in S

Related Books & Audiobooks