What <em>The Atlantic</em> Got Wrong About Reconstruction
![](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/4l92kn5v28bq9jav/images/fileE3ZE3EIG.jpg)
Editor’s Note: This article is part of “On Reconstruction,” a project about America’s most radical experiment.
The last time The Atlantic decided to reckon with Reconstruction in a sustained way, its editor touted “a series of scholarly, unpartisan studies of the Reconstruction Period” as “the most important group of papers” it would publish in 1901.
That was true, as far as it went. The collection of essays assembled by Bliss Perry, the literature professor who had recently taken the magazine’s reins, was a tribute to the editor’s craft. The contributors were evenly split between northerners and southerners, and included Democrats and Republicans, participants and historians, professors and politicians. One had been a Confederate colonel, another a Union captain. The prose was as vivid
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days