A billionaire and a novelist offer two versions of tech's future. Who's right?
![](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/5991g9e2dcbtkx30/images/file3HER5K31.jpg)
You could be forgiven for thinking the robots have taken over already.
Your boss' boss can't stop talking about ChatGPT. The world's most famous artificial intelligence developer, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, is apparently unfireable by his human handlers. Long-term thinkers have given us a couple of options about how to consider AI's future, though in the short term, they don't seem like options at all.
Option A: The marketplace could develop AI capable of civilization-scale tasks like interplanetary colonization. We must build AI that serves humanity!
Option B: The marketplace could develop AI capable of civilization-scale tasks like enslaving — or exterminating — people . We must build AI that serves humanity!
AI might be new, but some philosophies of. Today, it's the venture capitalists with the accelerationist manifestos, the accusations of false consciousness and the impatience with the bourgeois sentimentalists ( and newspaper , for example) who stand in the future's way.
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days