![f0018-06.jpg](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/2b4uo1epz4coegit/images/fileNVR829UT.jpg)
![f0019-01.jpg](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/2b4uo1epz4coegit/images/fileH2D1GEWF.jpg)
We love to hear from you, so why not let us know what you like, or dislike, in YOUR magazine. Simply get in touch by sending emails to: letters@classicmechanics.com or direct to the editor at BSimmonds@Mortons.co.uk or post your letters to the normal address.
The best will win one of our lovely T-shirts!
![f0018-01.jpg](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/2b4uo1epz4coegit/images/fileR0JGN56J.jpg)
![f0018-02.jpg](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/2b4uo1epz4coegit/images/fileK3G6DCX6.jpg)
![f0018-03.jpg](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/2b4uo1epz4coegit/images/fileBYM6YQYC.jpg)
![f0018-04.jpg](https://article-imgs.scribdassets.com/2b4uo1epz4coegit/images/fileBX4SZWVC.jpg)
Bravo, Bolas!
Not my normal thing to drop a message regarding a bike test in a magazine. However, I feel praise should always be given where it’s due.
I am a bit long in the tooth and came back to reading CMM after a few years away. The reason I stopped buying magazines was that I felt the journalism could often be very poor. Clearly the machines tested are ‘retrospective’ and not a manufacturer’s test bike. This can lead you into avenues that have