The Science of Liberty: Democracy, Reason, and the Laws of Nature
Written by Timothy Ferris
Narrated by Fred Stella
4/5
()
About this audiobook
"Ferris is a master analogist who conveys his insights on the history of cosmology with a lyrical flair." —The New York Times Book Review
In The Science of Liberty, award-winning author Timothy Ferris—called "the best popular science writer in the English language today" by the Christian Science Monitor and "the best science writer of his generation" by the Washington Post—makes a passionate case for science as the inspiration behind the rise of liberalism and democracy. In the grand tradition of such luminaries of the field as Bill Bryson, Richard Dawkins, and Oliver Sacks—as well as his own The Whole Shebang and Coming of Age in the Milky Way—Ferris has written a brilliant chronicle of how science sparked the spread of liberal democracy and transformed today's world.
Timothy Ferris
Timothy Ferris's works include Seeing in the Dark, The Mind's Sky (both New York Times best books of the year), and The Whole Shebang (listed by American Scientist as one of the one hundred most influential books of the twentieth century). A fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Ferris has taught in five disciplines at four universities. He is an emeritus professor at the University of California, Berkeley and a former editor of Rolling Stone. His articles and essays have appeared in The New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, Vanity Fair, National Geographic, Scientific American, The Nation, The New Republic, The New York Review of Books, The New York Times Book Review, and many other publications. A contributor to CNN and National Public Radio, Ferris has made three prime-time PBS television specials: The Creation of the Universe, Life Beyond Earth, and Seeing in the Dark. He lives in San Francisco.
More audiobooks from Timothy Ferris
Perfectly Reasonable Deviations From the Beaten Track: The Letters of Richard P. Feynman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life beyond Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Seeing in the Dark: How Amateur Astronomers Are Discovering the Wonders of the Universe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Red Limit: The Search for the Edge of the Universe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Science of Liberty
Related audiobooks
Let's Be Reasonable: A Conservative Case for Liberal Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy in America Vol. I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ideas That Made America: A Brief History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Enlightenment: Reason, Tolerance, and Humanity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Secular Enlightenment Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Age of American Unreason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Revolution of the Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fire and Light: How the Enlightenment Transformed Our World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Exceptional History: The Birth of American Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Republic of Plato Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History - Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thomas Paine: Enlightenment, Revolution, and the Birth of Modern Nations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5First Principles: What America's Founders Learned from the Greeks and Romans and How That Shaped Our Country Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Educate a Citizen: The Power of Shared Knowledge to Unify a Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Politicians and the Egalitarians: The Hidden History of American Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Education of Henry Adams Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Washington's Farewell: The Founding Father's Warning to Future Generations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The American Bible: How Our Words Unite, Divide, and Define a Nation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy in America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Preface to Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Myth of Left and Right: How the Political Spectrum Misleads and Harms America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Radicalism of the American Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Broken Constitution: Lincoln, Slavery, and the Refounding of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Science & Mathematics For You
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Starry Messenger: Cosmic Perspectives on Civilization Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Radiolab: Journey Through The Human Body Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Neuroscientist Who Lost Her Mind: My Tale of Madness and Recovery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Radiolab: Mixtape: How The Cassette Changed The World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Outsmart Your Brain: Why Learning is Hard and How You Can Make It Easy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Marshmallow Test: Mastering Self-Control Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cosmos: A Personal Voyage Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Every Tool's a Hammer: Life Is What You Make It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fuzz: When Nature Breaks the Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Radiolab: The Feels Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Thinking in Systems: A Primer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quantum Physics: What Everyone Needs to Know Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Brain Rules (Updated and Expanded): 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Expectation Effect: How Your Mindset Can Change Your World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Free Will Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conscious: A Brief Guide to the Fundamental Mystery of the Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Salt: A World History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cosmic Serpent: DNA and the Origins of Knowledge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Science of Liberty
6 ratings5 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I very much want to agree totally with the review, below, by wanack. I do not disagree with a word of the short review. However, I must agree somewhat with the earlier review by suggesting that the first two-thirds of the book would have sufficed. The basic premise of the mutually beneficial value of science and liberty working together for human progress is at the heart of the book. The rest of the book provides one illustration after the other to support the basic premise.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Timothy Ferris is an enthusiastic student and synthesizer of others' primary research. This means he paints inevitably broad strokes and makes necessary selections from vast specialist literatures. It also means that he, like most of us, occasionally stumbles with inaccurate facts or infelicitous summaries of complex ideas. (Two examples occurring to this reviewer are a minor misstatement about the effects of neutron bombs and a brief discussion of Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific revolutions that might be a little misleading. But whether neutron bombs destroy property has no bearing on Ferris' thesis and the argument would be little improved by adding more of Kuhn's ideas about the usefulness of "normal science" between "revolutions." A selection was made; take it as you find it.) But Ferris is honest and thus provides fairly detailed notes, which enable the reader to do two things that substantially increase the value of the book: check his work and use his synthesis as a reference piece. Readers who fail to understand this particular genre (not specialized, not exhaustive, argumentative but transparent) will criticize it unfairly on points that make no difference to its viability.That prefatory caveat (and high-horsey admonition to other reviewers) aside, The Science of Liberty tells a story that needs to be told more often: science and liberalism (the lowercase variety) go hand-in-hand to promote freedom and well-being by systematically and constitutionally rejecting ideology and dogma. Even better, Ferris narrates his argument, from the Milesians to global warming and Islamist terrorism, with easy clarity. Science thrives when and where people are free to think, investigate, and communicate without state restrictions; thriving science promotes technological benefits; and creative investigations of our world are further enabled where well-being is enhanced by those benefits. Meanwhile, the virtuous habits of doubting what is received while emphasizing the provisionality of what is given promote the development of a more tolerant and humane world. And, finally, the universal accessibility science makes its benefits more broadly shareable than those of ideology and dogma, which thrive on parochialism. His argument comes, essentially, to this: science without liberty withers away, while the values that science promotes can only bolster liberty; the two together form something like a positive feedback loop.Near the end of the book, a chapter each is devoted to two forms of what Ferris calls "antiscience": totalitarianism and postmodern pseudo-intellectualism. The "pseudo-" is not his, but Ferris would surely not disagree; he calls it "Academic Antiscience," but observes that the postmodern critique, insofar as it is valuable, states only obvious trivialities (that scientific findings are provisional, that scientists cannot claim pure objectivity, etc.) and has elsewhere called the rest of it "pernicious nonsense." On totalitarianism, page after page of examples from Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and Communist China support his argument: ideology and dogma promoted to political authority stifle scientific research surely and with stunning consciousness of motive in their implementation.The broad, underlying point of The Science of Liberty might have been stated more clearly. Ferris suggests, without saying it clearly and succinctly, that science and liberalism are, if not the most "natural" mode of human existence (and what does "natural" mean, anyway?), the surest path to well-being and self-realization. It is a bold argument (and one of the blurbs on the back of the dust jacket says that "He boldly goes where no science writer has gone before") but one that deserves to be considered.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5a very well written researched book about how science and democracy reinforce each other a excellent read
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5skimmed this come back with more time - makes the case for science as the inspiration behind the rise of liberalism and democracy
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In this ambitious undertaking by science popularizer Timothy Ferris, the author attempts to argue that science is a precursor of liberty, in that scientific thinking fosters a preference for democracy. Science encourages experimentation and questioning of authority; it argues for the freedom to explore new ideas and hear new voices and use new methods. Good science comes from conflict, and from advancement on the basis of merit. It was only natural, argues Ferris, that the development of the scientific method inspired a search for a new form of government, one that would both reflect the values inherent in scientific inquiry, and also allow for the tangible results of that inquiry to benefit the people.Specifically, Ferris begins by arguing that The Scientific Revolution (starting roughly with Copernicus) was the cause of the subsequent democratic revolution that “spread freedom and equal rights to nearly half the world’s inhabitants.” A more accurate (if less felicitous) title of the book would have been, The Role of Science in Establishing Liberty.Ferris overstates his case somewhat when he claims that “science flourishes only [sic] in liberal-democratic environments” because it is (1) inherently antiauthoritarian, (2) self-correcting, (3) dependent on drawing on all available intellectual resources, (4) powerful, and (5) a social activity. Those reasons are why science and liberalism go well together, but do not prove that one is the sine qua non of the other. As he demonstrated in earlier books, Ferris is a very good historian of ideas. He shows how the scientific ideas of Galileo and Newton may have influenced the philosophical-political ideas of John Locke, Thomas Paine, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton, and thus the Enlightenment and the establishment of American democracy. The Federalist Papers, he notes, used the word “experiment” forty-five times. He also references Benjamin Franklin’s address to the Constitutional Convention in which Franklin praised the construction of a government that could accommodate future information and an increase in knowledge rather than a dogmatic insistence on finality in its then present form. Ferris further cites the theoretical physicist Lee Smolin: "Good science comes from the collision of contradictory ideas, from conflict, from people trying to do better than their teachers did, and I think here we have a model for what a democratic society is about.”Ferris devotes a chapter to the Terror of the French Revolution, the excesses of which he ascribes to the fact that philosophy (particularly that of Rousseau), not science “drove” the Revolution. His analysis of why the French chose the Terror over moderation is not satisfactory. He says they “neglected the fundamental lesson of science and liberalism—that the key to success is to experiment and to abide by the results.” But they did experiment, first with a non-bloody revolt, followed by the execution of the king, and then by wholesale executions of everyone who seemed to doubt the virtue of the people in power. The failure to experiment was not the problem - choosing the wrong philosophy was.Ferris also has trouble reconciling 19th century imperialism with his science driven liberal philosophy. He recognizes that science creates power in the cognoscenti, and observes that the ones holding technological advantages used them to subjugate whole civilizations that did not possess those advantages. How did a people who thought themselves free end up subjugating so much of the world? Ferris has no real answer to that question other than to observe that colonialism was an anachronism, and that by 1980 no substantial colonies existed anywhere. Ferris argues convincingly that the scientific method applied to the process of wealth creation and distribution has yielded good results. He shows that modern economics, starting with Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, like the “hard sciences,” is objective (rather that subjective or directed to the way things ought to be), quantitative, and empirical. In Ferris’s words, economics is not “like cultural anthropology, much of which reads like fairy tales translated into Esperanto, and psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud, who discovered nothing and cured nobody.” He notes that even though there is a tension between Keynesians and the Chicago School of Economics, liberal democracies tend to experiment with aspects of both schools. Moreover, by building a body of empirical information, the theories continue to evolve.Ferris is highly critical of totalitarian antiscience and academic antiscience. He shows that science progressed much more slowly under the regimes of the Nazis, Soviets, and Chinese than under the western democracies. He also deprecates the rise of antiscientific academic philosophies like postmodernism and deconstructionism, which, he contends, uncritically accept the truth or validity of many forms of intellectual nonsense. The final chapter of the book is entitled, “One World.” It can be summarized by saying civilized people are all inconvenienced greatly by dogmatists, particularly of the religious (and especially the Islamic) variety. Ferris notes that “scientists originally were as religious as the rest of the population, but the scientific process and the knowledge it obtains are so different from religious practices and doctrines that it is becoming increasingly difficult…to accommodate both within a single worldview.” He concludes with a paean to liberal democracy, where a country may go from George W. Bush to Barak Hussein Obama—or the other way around. Evaluation: This is a good book in that it explores cogently the interrelation of many complex ideas. It is flawed in that it is able to sustain its thesis through many, but not all, of the subjects covered. Ferris’s other books, in which he doesn’t stray so far from cosmology and physics, are more compelling.Rating: 3.5/5