The Negro at Work in New York City A Study in Economic Progress
()
Read more from George Edmund Haynes
The Negro at Work in New York City A Study in Economic Progress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Negro at Work in New York City: A Study in Economic Progress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Negro at Work in New York City A Study in Economic Progress
Related ebooks
The Negro at Work in New York City A Study in Economic Progress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rise of Cotton Mills in the South Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Negro Migrant in Pittsburgh Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScarcity and Survival in Central America: Ecological Origins of the Soccer War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Policy, Planning, and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTonalà: Conservatism, Responsibility, and Authority in a Mexican Town Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Stake in the Land Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe New Revolution: A Historic Review of Civil Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCities and crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Good Reputation: How Residents Fight for an American Barrio Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDo It Right!: Journey, Migration & Survival Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStreetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Politics of Urban and Regional Development and the American Exception Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Agrarian Problem in the Sixteenth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History of Louisville, from the Earliest Settlement till the Year 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cost of Living Among Wage-Earners Fall River, Massachusetts, October, 1919, Research Report Number 22, November, 1919 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBargaining for Brooklyn: Community Organizations in the Entrepreneurial City Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElements of the Natural Movement of Population Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Agrarian Problem in the Sixteenth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew Homes for Old Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPopulation Trends in New Jersey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Road to Redemption: Southern Politics, 1869-1879 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVillainage in England: Essays in English Mediaeval History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Changing American Neighborhood: The Meaning of Place in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHomeless: Poverty and Place in Urban America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Losing Control?: Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWomen Wage-Earners: Their Past, Their Present, and Their Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProgress and Poverty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Negro at Work in New York City A Study in Economic Progress
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Negro at Work in New York City A Study in Economic Progress - George Edmund Haynes
The Project Gutenberg eBook, The Negro at Work in New York City, by George Edmund Haynes
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: The Negro at Work in New York City
A Study in Economic Progress
Author: George Edmund Haynes
Release Date: February 28, 2008 [eBook #24712]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE NEGRO AT WORK IN NEW YORK CITY***
E-text prepared by Jeannie Howse, Suzanne Shell,
and the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team
(http://www.pgdp.net)
Transcriber's Note:
Inconsistent hyphenation in the original document has been preserved.
Obvious typographical errors have been corrected. For a complete list, please see the
end of this document
.
Click on the images to see a larger version.
STUDIES IN HISTORY, ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC LAW
EDITED BY THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OF
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
Volume XLIX Number 3
Whole Number 124
THE NEGRO AT WORK IN
NEW YORK CITY
A Study in Economic Progress
BY
GEORGE EDMUND HAYNES, Ph.D.
Sometime Fellow of the Bureau of Social Research,
New York School of Philanthropy;
Professor of Social Science in Fisk University
New York
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
LONGMANS, GREEN & CO., AGENTS
London: P.S. King & Son
1912
Copyright, 1912
BY
GEORGE EDMUND HAYNES
PREFACEToC
This study was begun as one of the several researches of the Bureau of Social Research of the New York School of Philanthropy, largely at the suggestion of Dr. Samuel McCune Lindsay, the director, to whose interest, advice and sympathy its completion is largely due. Sincere thanks are due the Bureau for making the investigation possible.
The material was gathered between January, 1909, and January, 1910, except about four weeks in August, 1909, during the time that I was pursuing studies at the School of Philanthropy and at Columbia University.
The investigation necessarily involved many questions concerning the personal affairs of many Negroes of New York and it is a pleasant duty to acknowledge the unvarying cheerfulness with which they rendered assistance in securing the facts.
I wish to acknowledge especially the help of Dr. William L. Bulkley in making possible many of the interviews with wage-earners, of Dr. Roswell C. McCrea for criticism and encouragement in preparation of the monograph, and of Dr. E.E. Pratt, sometime fellow of the Bureau of Social Research; Miss Dora Sandowsky for her careful and painstaking tabulation of most of the figures. They should not be charged, however, with responsibility for any of the errors that may be detected by the trained eye.
The study as now published is incomplete. Part I, the Negro as a Wage-earner and Part II, the Negro in Business, were to be supplemented by Part III, the Negro in the Professions. But the time absorbed in gathering the material for the first two parts prevented the securing of a sufficient amount of personally ascertained data for the third; it seemed best to concentrate on the first two for the sake of thoroughness.
The summaries following the data on the several points and at the end of each chapter, and the conclusion at the end of the volume contain some repetitions which may be open to criticism, but they have been retained with the hope of making the monograph useful to those who wish to know the conclusions from the succession of figure upon figure and percentage upon percentage, without necessarily going through these details. At the same time, anyone who may wish to weigh the inferences in the light of the facts has the details before him.
Conditions among Negroes in Philadelphia have been adequately studied in the work of Dr. W.E.B. DuBois and Dr. R.R. Wright, Jr. It is to be hoped that some time soon the need of similar inquiries in other cities—East, West, North and South—may be realized and that provision may be made in this way for the guidance of the growing impulses of those who wish to better conditions in urban centers.
I am aware that there are good reasons for criticism of these pages. But what has been done was done in the search for the truth, that the enthusiasm of reform may be linked with the reliability of knowledge in the efforts to better the future conditions of the city and the Negro.
George Edmund Haynes.
Fisk University, Nashville, Tenn., April 1, 1912.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
THE NEGRO AS A WAGE EARNER
IN NEW YORK CITY
CHAPTER IToC
The City
[1]
and the Negro—The Problem
The city of to-day, the growth of the past century, is a permanent development. Dr. Weber has effectively treated the history, nature, causes and effects of the concentration. He shows[2] that the percentage of urban population has varied in different countries; and that this is due mainly to the varying density of population and to the diverse physical features of the countries which have been differently affected by the Industrial Revolution and the era of railroads. The causes of this concentration have been the divorce of men from the soil, the growth of commercial centers, the growth of industrial centers, and such secondary and individual causes as legislation, educational and social advantages.
In the United States, city growth has been affected by all of the several causes that have operated in other countries, modified at times and in places by exceptional influences.[3]
In the discussions concerning the Negro and his movement cityward, it is often assumed that his migration is affected by causes of a different kind from those moving other populations; or that it is not similar in respect to the movement of the white population under similar conditions; or that the concentration can result only in dire disaster both to himself and to the community into which he moves. Such facts as are available suggest that these assumptions are ill-founded. The efforts that are being put forth to improve rural conditions and to advance agricultural arts among Negroes are highly commendable and effective. The thesis of this chapter is that, notwithstanding improvements resulting from these efforts for rural districts, wherever similar causes operate under similar conditions, the Negro, along with the white population, is coming to the city to stay; that the problems which grow out of his maladjustment to the new urban environment are solvable by methods similar to those that help other elements of the population.
In the first place, so far as we know now, the general movement of the Negroes, speaking for the South, does not seem to have been very different from that of the whites. Professor Wilcox says,[4]
It is sometimes alleged that the migration to cities, which has characterized nearly all countries and all classes of population during the last half century, has affected Southern whites more than Southern negroes, and that the latter race is thus being segregated in the rural districts. That such a movement may have gone on, or may now be in progress, in parts of the South can neither be affirmed nor denied on the basis of the present figures, but it may be said with some confidence that, as a general statement applied to the whole South, it is not correct. To be sure the negroes constitute 32.6 per cent of the population of the country districts in the entire South and only 30.9 per cent of the city population, but an examination of the figures (Census 1900) for the several divisions and states will show that what is in some degree true of the South as a whole is not true of most of its parts.
Therefore, it is of importance to note that the movement of white and Negro populations toward cities tends to be coincident. We may get some indication of these movements of white and Negro populations cityward by comparing the growth of their numbers in the principal Northern and Southern cities from 1860 to 1900.
The Negro population has shown a greater increase than the white in each southern city taken separately for the entire period, 1860 to 1900, but together the movement of the white and Negro populations was similar except between 1860 and 1870. That fourteen of the southern cities show an excessive proportional increase of Negro population between 1860 and 1870 is probably due (1) to the very small proportionate Negro population in each of these cities in 1860, the Negroes being almost entirely in the rural districts, and (2) to the exceptional influences following the Civil War which uprooted the rural Negro population that was proportionately larger than the white. The truth of this is corroborated by the per cent of increase by decades for these southern cities taken together. Comparisons with the white population in Northern cities were not made because of the influence of foreign immigration of whites. The per cent of increase of the populations in Southern cities from 1860 to 1870 were white 16.7 per cent, Negro 90.7 per cent; from 1870 to 1880, white 20.3 per cent, Negro 25.5 per cent; from 1880 to 1890, white 35.7 per cent, Negro 38.7 per cent; from 1890 to 1900, white 20.8 per cent, Negro 20.6 per cent; from 1900 to 1910, white 27.7 per cent, Negro 20.6 per cent. That is, when the proportion between the urban and rural populations of blacks and whites becomes normal, and exceptional influences no longer bear upon the Negro, the two populations show about the same rate of increase in their migrations to these Southern cities. The percent of increase of the Negro population for eight Northern cities (counting all the boroughs of New York City as now constituted as one) was as follows: 1860-1870, 51 per cent; 1870-1880, 36.4 per cent; 1880-1890, 32.3 per cent; 1890-1900, 59.2 per cent. The larger liberty of Northern cities was coupled with the economic call of better wages. And this probably may account for the fact that Southern cities show an increase of whites of 7.7 per cent more than of Negroes between 1900-1910. The migration to both Southern and Northern cities is graphically illustrated in the accompanying diagram.
Diagram I: Per Cent Increase of Whites and Negroes
The figures for Southern cities represented in the diagram are given in Table I.
Table I. Number and Per Cent. Increase of White and Negro Populations, Principal Southern Cities, 1860-1900.
[A]
[A] Table is based on figures compiled from Eighth Census, Pop., pp. 9, 19, 46, 74,