Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Martin Chuzzlewit
Martin Chuzzlewit
Martin Chuzzlewit
Ebook1,203 pages20 hours

Martin Chuzzlewit

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

With an Introduction and Notes by Dr John Bowen, Department of English, University of Keele.

Illustrations by Hablot K. Browne (Phiz).

Martin Chuzzlewit is Charles Dickens' comic masterpiece about which his biographer, Forster, noted that it marked a crucial phase in the author's development as he began to delve deeper into the 'springs of character'.

Old Martin Chuzzlewit, tormented by the greed and selfishness of his family, effectively drives his grandson, young Martin, to undertake a voyage to America. It is a voyage which will have crucial consequences not only for young Martin, but also for his grandfather and his grandfather's servant, Mary Graham with whom young Martin is in love. The commercial swindle of the Anglo-Bengalee company and the fraudulent Eden Land Corporation have a topicality in our own time.

This strong sub-plot shows evidence of Dickens' mastery of crime where characters such as the criminal Jonas Chuzzlewit, the old nurse Mrs Gamp, and the arch-hypocrite Seth Pecksniff are the equal to any in his other great novels. Generations of readers have also delighted in Dickens' wonderful description of the London boarding-house - 'Todgers'.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateOct 1, 2011
ISBN9781848703704
Author

Charles Dickens

Charles Dickens (1812-70) was an English writer, generally considered to be the greatest novelist of the Victorian period and responsible for some of English literature's most iconic novels and characters. He continues to be one of the best-known and most read of English authors, with multiple adaptations of his work frequently being produced.

Read more from Charles Dickens

Related to Martin Chuzzlewit

Titles in the series (72)

View More

Related ebooks

Classics For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for Martin Chuzzlewit

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

20 ratings18 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Martin Chuzzlewit (1843-44) is Dickens sixth novel, written after his first visit to America. It is generally considered transitional between his earlier and later works of maturity, Dickens borrows less from the picaresque (Martin's trip to America) and begins to focus on character development and a central theme, creating a unique style of his own. The theme, as Dickens says in the Preface, is "selfishness". It was written at the same time he wrote A Christmas Carol, and at the time he thought of Chuzzlewit the best novel to date - he was particularly attached to his characters Tom and Mary Pinch. Today the novel is one of his lesser known and read, although still generally has a positive critical reception.This is my sixth Dickens novel and they all take forever to read, at this point I have probably spent more time reading Dickens than any other novelist. The more I read the more I respect and enjoy, there is not a page that doesn't have an amazing passage, very often I find myself reading it aloud, acting out the scene and characters (something Dickens himself sometimes did while writing). There is a sense of the unlimited, of imagination unbounded - it's the same feeling I had when younger playing D&D or reading Lord of the Rings, a rich tapestry world with no end of possibility. His descriptions and choice of words are truly unique. Even if the plot is circumstantial and old-fashioned, Dickens can be read for his aesthetic and artistic beauty alone. The more immersed in Dickens one becomes, the more impressed upon the 19th century mind-set, emotions, way of thinking - a sense of the emotional, feeling, that no history book could portray.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The story: This is of the Chuzzlewit family and is a study of hypocrisy and selfishness and this book is a study of character. Some might say exaggerated but they do represent people in society. The Peckniffs and Sarah Gamp, the Jonas and the Martins Chuzzlewits. The book is called the last of Dickens picaresque novels. Another unique element is the American portion of the story which is a caricature of America. Dickens had just returned from a tour to the US and from this book, he was not impressed with us. Some could find this offensive but the more I read it the more I accepted that it did represent the US as a character that is no different that characters of England that Dickens has featured in his books. And last, this is a story of romance and endings that will not disappoint. I am glad to have read this book. I needed to read about Sarah Gamp. Being educated as a nurse with a background of having worked in hospitals, Ms Gamp has always been a stereotype that I’ve encountered but hadn’t read the book. Dickens mentions that she was not atypical of attendants at the time and many hospitals were poor institutes at best. Dickens never disappoints. It takes awhile to get into the rhythm of his books but they are always good. I have to say, that Sean Barrett did such a wonderful job of reading the story. Every character had their own voices, women were women (some were manly women) and men voices were men's’ voices except for the whiny barber. If willing to read a pdf file, the one listed above is of excellent quality and contains Dickens comments about the American part of the story.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Old Martin Chuzzlewit believes that his relations are only interested in him because he is rich (and this is mostly true), but mysteriously falls for the sycophantic attentions of the hypocritical Mr Pecksniff. His grandson, also Martin Chuzzlewit, falls out with him over Martin's choice of bride and the younger Martin goes to America to seek his fortune. There are many other characters and strands to the story which Dickens ingeniously brings together at the end. For a while I wondered why the novel had the title it did and who Martin and Tom's mysterious benefactors were, but all was made clear in the denouement. The good ended happily and the bad unhappily, although I did feel a twinge for Charity. I can see why the scenes set in America caused a bit of a stir - they are very harsh - but the tone is pretty sarcastic throughout. A very satisfying conclusion.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    It was a happy day when I, for whatever reason, elected to sample Charles Dickens. Having read A Tale of Two Cities in high school, I digressed to more popular fiction (Michener, Clavell, McMurtry, King, Grisham), as well as periods of science fiction and even non-fiction (Ambrose, McCollough for example), before making an effort to upgrade my reading list.I read some Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Steinbeck and Hemingway with mixed success before reading Great Expectations. I liked it enough to read David Copperfield, and I was hooked. A Tale of Two Cities followed and then Oliver Twist (not my favorite), Bleak House and Nicholas Nickleby before taking on this lengthy novel.Martin Chuzzlewit takes its name not from one, but two characters in the novel, a very wealthy, old gentleman and his grandson. While there are numerous story threads involved in the work, the overarching theme involves the ultimate disposition of the elder Chuzzlewit’s substantial fortune, the characters maneuvering for a piece of it and those on the periphery. As in almost all Dickens’s work, the beauty of the novel lies in the original and classic characters created therein. Heretofore, I had heard people referred to as “pecksniffs” without any understanding of the meaning (aside from context) or the source of the reference. Mr. Pecksniff and his daughters are central characters in this novel. The story was penned shortly after Dickens returned from a tour of the United States and that country does not show well in the younger Martin’s experiences there.Having read several Dickens works prior to this one, I was aware that a period of acclimation is required before becoming comfortable with both the language and the cultural landscape, however the comfort that I eventually attained in the previous novels was more difficult to come by here. To be honest, some of the dialogue, especially that of the old nurse was virtually unintelligible.Make no mistake, at nearly 900 pages this is a real door stop, with long periods of very slow advancement. Not my favorite of the several Dickens novels I have read, but not the worst.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Martin Chuzzlewit by Charles Dickens wasn’t a particularly long novel (unlike War and Peace) nor was the language particularly challenging (like the writing of Proust) yet I had a difficult time completing this novel.The characters in the book were incredibly rich, but many of them were completely unlikeable. The entire Pecksniff family, father and daughters alike, were despicable. The duplicitous nature of Seth Pecksniff made me ill each time he entered the scene. His blatant hypocrisy and pandering in the hopes of increasing his wealth and social standing was nauseating. While the daughters may have received unfair treatment by other characters, the manner in which they treated Pinch more than warranted the karmic payback. Jonas Chuzzlewit, a swindler and wife beater, at least received his due in the end.Sending a few of the characters off to America to try to make a fresh start was a bit confusing. It didn’t further the story and really only provided the author with a means at taking pot shots at the “U-nited States.” He made the entire country out to be a savage, disease infested wilderness run by a bunch of con-men. The characters’ survival of their time in Eden, however, did help forge their bonds through the remainder of the story.One main theme in the story, found in much of Dicken’s writing, is a commentary on class distinction. While Pinch was a surveyor and civil engineer, trades that are considered to be respectable today, he was always treated as a second class citizen by the Pecksniffs; often to the point of appearing to be no more than a lap dog. However, his higher caliber of character raises him in the end.The entire Pecksniff-Chuzzlewit clan could justify any means of advancing their standing. From their poor treatment of others, swindling through Ponzi schemes and even murder, nothing was beneath them and everything was rationalized to be morally acceptable. Their self righteous attitudes towards their foul deeds made them all the more corrupt.In retrospect, I think my difficulties may have roots in the fact that I simply didn’t like the people about which I was reading. The story was secondary to the characters and their moral defects.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Phew! This is long and I needed a break over halfway through, but I did it! A lot of Dickens' themes in this book are still relevant today--swindlers, employment, marriage, education, family, care of the elderly, and more. I do wish I had kept a character cheat sheet, as so many people are in and out, though the serial nature of the original publication helped a bit.I think my favorite character was Mrs Gamp--widow, midwife, overnight nurse, and nurse to the elderly or injured--just an older woman trying to make her way in mid-19th-century London. Mark Tapley was a little TOO jolly for my taste, the Pecksniffs (all) just annoying (as intended, I believe), Martin the elder is perhaps meant to be the favorite--or maybe Martin the younger. Not Jonas, nor Anthony, nor Tigg/Montague--obviously. I actually enjoyed the American interlude. No, it didn't really fit, but Dickens completely nailed many points of American history at that time (swindling, boomtowns and made-to-order "boom" towns, etc etc). But, I am glad to be done.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is Dickens' sixth major work, written when he was 31/32 years old. His writing skills are visibly improving, the characters are better developed and the plot structure is sound. But the reliance on coincidence and plot twists is typically Dickens. The book starts well, introducing the key characters gradually, developing them as the book proceeds. For the first time, the major villain (Pecksniff) is a rounded, believable creation. The major hero (Pinch) is also well developed, but just a little too good to be entirely credible. The seemingly obligatory comic character (Mrs Gamp) makes too many appearances and stays on the scene too long for my taste.The book was written after Dickens' first trip to the USA and he is humourously critical of much of the pretension he found there. He must have lost audience support in the US as a result, because the edition I read had a postscript, written around the time of his second visit 20 years later, stating how much the place has improved! Dickens' takes a progressive position on slavery and excoriates the practice in the US. He also paints an interesting picture of the gentleman, young Martin Chuzzlewit, learning how to live a better life from his servant, Mark Tapley - not a common position for an author to take in this era.A long book, at 786 pages, but as usual, I found myself drawn in to a real page turner in the last third of the work. Read February 2012.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Probably this novel (apparently Dickens' favorite) deserves 3 1/2 stars. Certainly, the last quarter of this measures up to his best but, unfortunately, I can't say the same for the first 75%. I did appreciate Dickens' satire of Americans (Martin the younger is a victim of someone selling him worthless land in a scheme reminiscent of selling the Brooklyn Bridge).

    Maybe I'm just suffering from reading too much Dickens in a short stretch of time, having read Dombey and Son, Bleak House, A Tale of Two Cities (audiobook), A Christmas Carol, several other short stories and poems, in addition to this book, in the past 35 days.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Not one of my favorites. Too long and too unfocused for my taste. The American journey didn't offend me -- it just didn't seem to fit. Characterized as a comic masterpiece by Forster, I disagree totally. Pecksniff was too mean-spirited to be funny as was the hypocritical Ms. Gamp (not to mention the fact that I couldn't understand a bloody word she said). It just didn't do much for me.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Another great Dickens’ novel of biblical proportions. Even the pages of this edition have a scriptural feel to them - thin and vellum-like, with the added benefit of the original illustrations.And the novel is everything that I have come to expect of Dickens. Plenty of memorable characters and scenes and a plot full of unexpectedly and unbelievable coincidences. You just have to suspend your modern cynicism and go with it - when you do, it’s incredibly satisfying. Every character, no matter how insignificant, gets their just desserts at the end.This is also the novel where Dickens turns his satirical eye on the United States, since two of the characters immigrate in quest of their fortune, and are horribly disappointed. In the appendix, there is actually a postscript where Dickens attempts to make amends.So heft a copy of this 800 page tome and give it a read - you won’t be disappointed.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Much to my surprise, Martin Chuzzlewit turned out to be one of my favorite Dickens books, right behind Bleak House and Great Expectations. It's funnier than most of his books and features one of Dickens' best villains, Seth Pecksniff (what a name). I have just one more Dickens novel, Our Mutual Friend, to finish and I can say I completed Dickens' oeuvre. It has taken me only ten years to do it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Dickens' own personal favorite of his stories and I think one of mine too. An amazing satire on how selfish people can get. It's not on the short side, but if you can sit through it it's worth your while.Martin Chuzzlewit is Charles Dickens' comic masterpiece about which his biographer, Forster, noted that it marked a crucial phase in the author's development as he began to delve deeper into the 'springs of character'.Old Martin Chuzzlewit, tormented by the greed and selfishness of his family, effectively drives his grandson, young Martin, to undertake a voyage to America. It is a voyage which will have crucial consequences not only for young Martin, but also for his grandfather and his grandfather's servant, Mary Graham with whom young Martin is in love. The commercial swindle of the Anglo-Bengalee company and the fraudulent Eden Land Corporation have a topicality in our own time. This strong sub-plot shows evidence of Dickens' mastery of crime where characters such as the criminal Jonas Chuzzlewit, the old nurse Mrs Gamp, and the arch-hypocrite Seth Pecksniff are the equal to any in his other great novels.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Although not one of Dickens' more popular books, this is one of the ones I re-read frequently. It has some of the author's most memorable characters - Sarah Gamp with her imaginary friend Mrs. Harris, the hypocrite Pecksniff, the low-life rascal Montague Tigg who transforms himself into the high-life rascal Tigg Montague (not the best choice of alias, one might think), the awful Jonas Chuzzlewit and the determinedly jolly Mark Tapley - the list goes on and on. Although it is fair to say that chapter 1 is probably the worst thing Dickens ever wrote (if there's a stronger contender, I don't want to know) there are some brilliant bits of writing, particularly the description of the commercial boarding-house Todgers's and the part of London in which it stood. It is sometimes said that that there are only seven basic plots, and that one of them is The Man Who Found Out Better; this book is overloaded with examples, from the title character to Pecksniff's daughter Mercy. The 90's TV adaptation was a creditable attempt, but the only way to get the authentic Dickens experience is from the book.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I tend to overdo my pleasures. Very recently, I've read Dombey and Sons, Hard Times, Our Mutual Friend, and the Mystery of Edwin Drood. So it's only to be expected that I should encounter a little Dickens fatigue. And along about page 600 of Martin Chuzzlewit, the thought kept popping into my mind, like those Interstate motel advertisements, "if this had been John Sanford's 'Prey on Greed', I would be home by now."Yes, I'd had it with ole "Sairey" Gamp, who seemed to have no purpose in Dicken's universe, except to annoy the hell out of me with her quaint dialect stylings and her bottle on the mantelpiece when she was so "dispoged". Not to mention how she precipitated a debilitating series of Robin-Williams-in-Doubtfire-drag flashbacks.And those Pecksniff hoes, Cherry and Merry? Like any time I want more of that action, there's a thousand starlet wannabe's on Youtube looking sideways at a web cam, mis-accenting their dialogue and raising their eyebrows like they all suffer from the same bizarre tic doloureux. Enuff a dat, thank you very much.I did enjoy Martin Jr. and Mark Tapley, when - to hum a bit of Paul Simon - they "walked off to look for America." Dickens riff list of New York City newspapers was genius "The Sewer, The Stabber, The Family Spy, The Private Listener, The Peeper, The Plunderer, The Keyhole Reporter, and The Rowdy Journal." Indeed, what with wire photos, colored printing, the Internet , it's nice to see that a century of technological change hasn't really spoiled the industry, eh wot?I found myself comparing Chuzzlewit to Our Mutual Friend. Both novels contained a universe of characters. In both, the ecology - the way they fed and fed on one another - was similarly complex. Both used major plot twists. But Our Mutual Friend has a much better flow (no pun about the Thames intended). And equivalent characters are much more interesting in Our Mutual Friend. Little Jenny Wren, for example, steals the show very much like Gamp does in Chuzzlewit, and has a role of equal proportion, but I think she's far more interesting and funny.Bottom line - two things - first, if you're thinking of broadening your reading of Dickens, choose Our Mutual Friend over Martin Chuzzlewit; second, Chuzzlewit doesn't have much forward motion, so focus on enjoying the eccentricities of the characters rather than expecting much from the plot.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Martin Chuzzlewit feels like the beginning of Dickens' second act. While all of his previous books had strengths (and I probably still viscerally prefer Nicholas Nickleby), this, his 9th major work and 6th novel, was written after the celebrity Dickens' return from America, and marks the start of a busier lifestyle for the author, which included social engagements, speaking tours, and community responsibilities, not to mention a growing household. My suspicion is that he started devoting more time to the nuances of his writing - not the descriptions, which have always been first-rate, but the character arcs. The vivid characters of Pecksniff and Mrs. Gamp have a comic life of their own, while the analysis of human folly among the Chuzzlewit family is a deeper, more internal attempt at storytelling which Dickens would return to in his next novel, Dombey and Son. For the first time, Dickens hasn't felt the need to make his central character a paper-thin but sentimental naif (not that young Martin is exactly the most scintillating of figures).

    We'll dock a couple of points for the American sequences, which have a reasonable level of thematic resonance but are clearly filler, but this is a new, more "novelistic" side of Dickens that can't be ignored. I certainly think more people should be reading Martin Chuzzlewit when they feel like a taste of Dickens.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The character Martin Chuzzlewit is comparable to Ebenezer Scrooge, an exceedingly wealthy man to whom money brings only grief, but surrounded by a large family comically obscene in its obsession with his estate. In true Dickens fashion the most honest and monetarily disinterested among them, if not entirely likeable - Martin's grandson and namesake - is the one Martin Sr. trusts least of all. I can't agree with Mr. Chesterton that it's rife with melancholy. In fact, while I didn't expect another Dickens novel to rival The Pickwick Papers for humour, this one stands in the running albeit with a nastier streak. The sarcasm and satire dials are turned up to 11, especially where Mr. Pecksniff is concerned. This is also the infamous novel in which Dickens goes America-bashing, following upon his tour of that country, which holds its own kind of fascination. I was most taken up when reading about Pecksniff since the novel feels devoted to showcasing him. Some of the minor characters - Jonas, Gamp, etc. - I was less keen on having to spend chapters with, but eventually these pay a dividend. Martin Jr. has an arc to his character that eventually does make him likeable if you can wait for it.I read each chapter in the spirit of sharing Dickens' having fun with his characters rather than worrying where his plot was going. Like the novels that preceded, it's not terribly focussed. He was becoming more sensitive to this critique, to judge from his introduction, and apparently with his next (Dombey and Son) he finally began to get a handle on it. This won't be my favourite of his but neither would I rate it his worst, and even Dickens at his worst is not a very bad thing.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Martin Chuzzlewit follows that formula that Dickens is so good at executing - our hero is basically a good person, but has some character flaws. Hero goes on a journey/experiences some serious hardship. Hero reforms and repents. And everyone lives happily ever after. I don't mind this formula and many of his stories that follow it, like Our Mutual Friend, end up being one of my favorite classics. But, in this story, our hero Martin Chuzzlewit goes on a journey to the United States and not only does he face physical hardship, but has to endure the crassness and shallow liberality of Americans. Definitely there was an agenda here describing Dickens dislike of certain American qualities. In some ways this was enlightening to see a visitor's viewpoint of America during the 1800's, but the message was too strong, and some of those quirky characters that he executes so well became a sounding board for his agenda.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This was one of the only two of Dickens's full length novels I had never read (the other is Dombey and Son). It's fair to say it's not going to become one of my favourites. The theme of the novel is selfishness, shown most consistently by Seth Pecksniff and Jonas Chuzzlewit, and initially also by the title character and his namesake grandfather ("The curse of our house..has been the love of self; has ever been the love of self. How often have I said so, when I never knew that I had wrought it upon others"). Young Martin's redemption comes after his near death experiences in a town in the back of beyond in America. The American portion of the novel is probably its most well known characteristic, being so unlike anything else in Dickens, but which forms a only small part of book. It is based on Dickens's own experiences of his first visit to the States, where he seems to have been most struck by three different wildly different phenomena: the horrors of slavery; the unpleasantness of the habit of tobacco chewing and spitting; and the complete absence of any copyright laws in the States at the time, which meant his works were being abused in his eyes. Most of the characters did not really impress in this one. The midwife Mrs Gamp is probably the best known and quite an effective comic character, though she has hardly entered the top pantheon of the author's most famous creations. My favourite was probably young Martin's loyal companion Mark Tapley, though I also liked Tom Pinch and his sister Ruth. Pecksniff's daughters the inaptly named Mercy and Charity take after him and were also quite amusing, and it was interesting to see how Mercy's character changed during the course of her book after undergoing her own redemption through a miserable marriage. All in all, though, this was a bit of a chore in places, albeit with some dramatic events and a couple of violent deaths.

Book preview

Martin Chuzzlewit - Charles Dickens

MARTIN

CHUZZLEWIT

Charles Dickens

Introduction and Notes by

john bowen

e1

Martin Chuzzlewit first published by Wordsworth Editions Limited in 1994

New introduction and notes added in 1997

Introduction and notes © John Bowen 1997

Published as an ePublication 2011

isbn 978-1-84870-370-4

Wordsworth Editions Limited

8B East Street, Ware, Hertfordshire sg12 9et

Wordsworth® is a registered trade mark of

Wordsworth Editions Limited

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Readers interested in other titles from Wordsworth Editions are invited to visit our website at

www.wordsworth-editions.com

For our latest list of printed books, and a full mail-order service, contact

Bibliophile Books, Unit 5 Datapoint,

South Crescent, London e16 4tl

tel: +44 (0) 207 474 2474

fax: +44 (0) 207 474 8589

e-mail: orders@bibliophilebooks.com

website: www.bibliophilebooks.com

For my husband

ANTHONY JOHN RANSON

with love from your wife, the publisher

Eternally grateful for your unconditional love,

not just for me but for our children,

Simon, Andrew and Nichola Trayler

introduction

Martin Chuzzlewit, Dickens’s sixth novel, is one of the funniest in the language, and has been loved and laughed at ever since its first appearance in monthly instalments in 1843–4. Its author was still only thirty when he began the book, but he was already the most celebrated and fêted author of his day, as he had been since the triumphant success of The Pickwick Papers six years before.

Much of the pleasure of the book comes from two immortal creations, Mrs Gamp and Mr Pecksniff. It is impossible to introduce them, and extracts from the novel can never really do justice to their sheer wild strangeness. Mr Pecksniff is often said to be a hypocrite; but he is much more than that, and his self-possessed power of deceit seems to take him beyond hypocrisy and moral judgement altogether. We sometimes wonder whether he is human at all, or some terrifyingly comic machine or monster. Like Scrooge at the beginning of A Christmas Carol, he seems completely impervious to all outside influence or threats, and every check on him seems to spur him on to yet more excesses. Even when Antony Chuzzlewit tells him to his face that he is a hypocrite, he is sublimely unruffled:

‘Charity, my dear,’ said Mr Pecksniff, ‘when I take my chamber candlestick tonight, remind me to be more than usually particular in praying for Mr Antony Chuzzlewit, who has done me an injustice.’

It is the precision that is so effective, and the extraordinary gift Dickens has of transforming the dead weight of bureaucratic waffle (‘more than usually particular’) into the deftest of characterisations.

The other great creation of the book is Mrs Gamp. In one way, she is simply a dirty, drunken old midwife and nurse. But she becomes for most readers a figure of mythical power and humour, to be compared with only the very greatest literary creations. Here she is with Mr Mould the undertaker:

‘Young ladies with such faces thinks of something else besides berryins, don’t they, sir?’

‘I am sure I don’t know, Mrs Gamp,’ said Mould, with a chuckle . . .

‘Oh yes, you do know, sir!’ said Mrs Gamp, ‘and so does Mrs Mould, your ansome pardner too, sir; and so do I, although the blessing of a daughter was deniged me; which if we had had one, Gamp would certainly have drunk its little shoes right off its feet, as with our precious boy he did, and arterwards send the child a errand to sell his wooden leg for any money as it ’ud fetch as matches in the rough, and bring it home in liquor: which was truly done beyond his years, for ev’ry individgle penny that child lost at toss or buy for kidney ones; and come home arterwards quite bold, to break the news, and offering to drown himself if sech would be a satisfaction to his parents. – Oh yes, you do know, sir,’ said Mrs Gamp, wiping her eye with her shawl, and resuming the thread of her discourse. ‘There’s something besides births and berryins in the newspapers, an’t there, Mr Mould?’

Dickens was interested in the way that opposites can be like one another, and Mrs Gamp brings together the two ends of human life, attending as she does ‘a lying-in or a laying-out with equal zest and relish’. In an unmistakable and precise comic idiom, she lurches with a kind of sure wildness between the life and idiom of the Victorian poor and deep meditations on human mortality, a view of the world where the only certain things are birth, death and ‘the bottle on the chimley-piece’.

Like Mr Pecksniff she is a monster, somebody who is or might be human, but who also makes us think or wonder (through our tears of laughter) if we can really take for granted what it is to be human at all. In fact, monsters and related creatures are very important for the whole story. Almost the first thing we see in the book is the dragon on the signpost of the Blue Dragon Inn, who becomes in Dickens’s description a peculiarly domestic little monster, ‘courteous and considerate . . . keeping one of his forepaws near his nose, as though he would say Don’t mind me – it’s only my fun. ’ The Pecksniffs are always thinking of people as monsters: Pecksniff calls young Martin a monster; his appalling daughters Charity and Mercy (‘not unholy names, I hope?’) call Tom Pinch a ‘creature’ and a ‘monster’; later still Jonas Chuzzlewit is a ‘Griffin’. Even the coach that takes young Martin away is ‘monstrous’ to Tom Pinch, as is the steamer which takes him to America. In one of the funniest passages of the book, Mr Pecksniff attempts to introduce a classical allusion to ‘those fabulous animals (pagan, I regret to say) who used to sing in the water’:

Mr George Chuzzlewit suggested ‘Swans’.

‘No.’ said Mr Pecksniff. ‘Not swans. Very like swans, too. Thank you.’

The nephew with the outline of a countenance, speaking for the first and last time on that occasion, propounded ‘Oysters’.

‘No,’ said Mr Pecksniff, with his own peculiar urbanity, ‘nor oysters. But by no means unlike oysters; a very excellent idea; thank you, my dear sir, very much. Wait. Sirens. Dear me! Sirens, of course.’

The Blue Dragon, the sirens, the singing swans and oysters, and Mr Pecksniff himself, are fabulous animals indeed, and like the nephew with the outline of a countenance who says but a single word – ‘Oysters’ – we remember them for ever.

The inn sign is important for another reason because it points to the way that dead or inanimate objects in Dickens are constantly on the verge of becoming alive. The wind that opens the second chapter is as extraordinarily lively as the sign on the Blue Dragon, a ‘swaggerer’ who after tipping Mr Pecksniff on his head ‘hurried away rejoicing . . . until it got out to sea where it met with other winds similarly disposed, and made a night of it’. And just as dead or inanimate objects can seem to come alive, so human or living things can sometimes appear to be machines or dead matter. Dickens throughout his life was fascinated both by copies of living things – like waxworks, masks and corpses – and by pieces of dead matter that fasten on to human beings or seem to come alive. The first letter of his that survives makes a joke about a wooden leg, and he never stops making such jokes. Mrs Gamp’s husband sells his wooden leg for matches, and Mr Pecksniff even manages to make wooden legs the subject of a moral contrast – ‘The legs of the human subject, my friends, are a beautiful production. Compare them with wooden legs and observe the differences between the anatomy of nature and the anatomy of art.’

The inn-board is also a sign, and Dickens constantly draws attention to the power and strangeness of signs and symbols. There are very many scenes of writing, drawing and inscription in the book, and the book is full of signs and tokens. Indeed, like all books, it is made up of them. This is particularly clear in the Chuzzlewits’ successive and various attempts to insinuate themselves into old Martin’s will, a document which he is constantly writing and then destroying, unread. Pecksniff’s architectural practice is constantly making the signs of buildings that are never built and his whole life is built on a ‘strong trustfulness in sounds and forms’ that makes him a mere ‘direction-post which is always telling the direction of a place and never goes there’. Like his daughters, he is extremely adept at taking the outward signs of morality – such as simplicity and natural goodness – to cover the most ruthless power-seeking.

Language and truth are thus often at war in the novel. When John Westlock tries to bring home to Tom Pinch how dreadfully Pecksniff is exploiting him, he can only do so through denying what he knows to be true, and calling it ‘madness’:

‘Madness!’ returned young Westlock. ‘Certainly its madness . . . Who but a madman would suppose you advertise him hereabouts, much cheaper and much better than a chalker in the walls could, eh, Tom? . . . or, to be more wild and monstrous still . . . that Pecksniff traded in your nature, and that your nature was, to be timid and distrustful of yourself, and trustful of all other men, but most of all, of him who least deserves it. There would be madness, Tom!’

In a world where Pecksniff is taken as a moral man, and where good nature and kindness can be ‘traded in’ like commodities, truth can only appear as a sort of madness. It is a disturbing set of thoughts, but they are near the heart of the novel, and give it much of its surprisingly modern air.

These ideas and questions become yet more apparent in the ‘American’ sections of the book where Dickens writes some of the most savage (and funny) satire in all his work. Much of Martin’s experience of the United States is of the distortions and impossibilities of language. There is General Cyrus Choke’s letter:

Devoted mind and body, heart and soul, to freedom, sir – to freedom, blessed solace to the snail upon the cellar-door, the oyster in his pearly bed, the still mite in his home of cheese, the very winkle of your country in his shelly lair – in her unsullied name, we offer you our sympathy . . .

and the not-quite-entirely-incomprehensible philosophy of the lady in the wig:

‘Mind and matter,’ said the lady in the wig, ‘glide swift into the vortex of immensity. Howls the sublime and softly sleeps the calm Ideal, in the whispering chambers of Imagination. To hear it, sweet it is. But, then outlaughs the stern philosopher, and saith to the Grotesque, What ho! arrest for me that agency. Go bring it here. And so the vision fadeth.’

The names of the New York newspapers – the Sewer, the Stabber, the Family Spy, the Peeper, the Plunderer – give a fair idea of their truthfulness. Most disturbing, and potentially fatal to Martin, is the advertising copy of Zephaniah Scadder who persuades him to buy property in a place which is called Eden but which is more like Hell. Here, the signs of language seem to float free from any truth or reference to the world. At times, of course, it is just people getting carried away with their own rhetoric, or the sharp businessman deceiving the naïve punter, but there are also times when we start to wonder whether there is anything behind or beyond rhetoric at all.

The black satire of these passages is in part a mark of Dickens’s disappointment with the United States. He had travelled there the previous year in great hope, but as his letters – and American Notes, the book he made out of them – show, he was very disappointed. America in Martin Chuzzlewit is a world on the one hand of empty or lying or misleading signs, on the other of raw nature and violence, about to become swamp or chaos. Critics have disagreed as to the accuracy of Dickens’s picture of nineteenth-century American society, but it is striking that the things that troubled him most – the power of journalism and what we now call ‘the media’, of social violence and of the destructive force of free enterprise – are still at the centre of controversy and debate. These forces lead young Martin to the very edge of human society, to despair and nearly to death itself.

Part of Dickens’s anger with the USA stemmed from his hatred of slavery, which was still legal and flourishing in the Southern States. Some of the most melancholy and ‘un-Dickensian’ pages of American Notes are those that reproduce, page after pitiful page, the advertisements for runaway slaves from contemporary newspapers in the slave States:

Ran away, Negress Caroline. Had on a collar with one prong turned down.

Ran away, a black woman, Betsy. Had an iron bar on her right leg.

Ran away, the negro Manuel. Much marked with irons.

Ran away, the negress Fanny. Had on an iron band about her neck.

Ran away, a negro boy about twelve years old. Had round his neck a chain dog-collar with ‘De Lampert’ engraved on it.

It is very different from the exuberant rhetoric that is the characteristic mark of Dickens’s style, but there could not be a more eloquent or powerful condemnation. In Martin Chuzzlewit, the anger is equally apparent, most strikingly perhaps in its depiction of the American flag, where ‘the stars wink upon the bloody stripes’, the stripes of the flag transformed into the stripes on a slave’s whipped back.

Although England was free from slavery it was certainly not free from ruthless, acquisitive fraud and the manipulation of signs and tokens. The England that Dickens writes about in Martin Chuzzlewit was undergoing enormous processes of change: political, industrial, social and economic. The Industrial Revolution had transformed large areas of the country beyond recognition and the years of Dickens’s life, 1812 to 1870, saw the creation of enormous and unprecedented wealth and power in the rise of Britain to industrial and imperial pre-eminence. But it also saw, in the slums, factories and mines of Manchester and London, the most terrible exploitation and cruelty. As a twelve-year-old boy, Dickens had worked in a rat-infested warehouse on the banks of the Thames, sticking labels on pots of shoe-blacking, his father an imprisoned bankrupt. Still in his teens, a parliamentary reporter, he had witnessed the passage of the First Reform Act of 1832, and the first, faltering attempts to regulate the hours of children in factories and mines. As a young novelist, he had travelled to Manchester to see the factory system at first hand, and in the United States he visited prisons and factories in a constant, inquisitive search to comprehend the extraordinary forces that were recreating the world before his eyes.

Critics have sometimes seen Dickens as a rather naïve critic of Victorian society and capitalism because there are relatively few factories and industrial workers in his novels. But, as we can see in Martin Chuzzlewit, he is extremely interested in what lies behind industry and business, in particular the power of banks and financial institutions and the economics of rent and speculation. Mr Pecksniff is a member of the rentier class, someone who lives on the backs of other people’s work: Tom Pinch’s, Young Martin’s and his tenants’. Even his moral hypocrisy Dickens describes in economic terms: ‘he was a tradesman dealing in a certain species of moral exhortation’. But the most interesting example is the depiction of Montague Tigg and the Anglo-Bengalee Disinterested Loan and Life Assurance Company. Montague Tigg, who begins the novel as the shabby parasite of Chevy Slyme, is transformed into Tigg Montague ‘the great capitalist’, transmuting in the process Young Bailey, the put-upon boots at Todger’s, into Mr Bailey Junior, man about town. It is of course, all a fraud, resting on nothing but the manipulation of appearances and such signs of power and wealth as fire-buckets and ledgers, court-guides and letter-boxes, weighing-machines, safes, and the ‘vast red waistcoat’ of Bullamy, the company’s porter.

As these examples may suggest, Martin Chuzzlewit has a magnificently complicated and ramshackle plot, loosely centred on the battle to inherit old Martin’s wealth and involving blackmail and fraud, bribery, suicide and murder. In the preface to the book, Dickens says that his aim was to show ‘how selfishness propagates itself’, and this is confirmed and emphasised by old Martin’s important outburst at the end of Chapter Three, which condemns selfishness, but does so in the most self-centred of ways. The book then goes on to show how difficult it is for young Martin to free himself from his upbringing, and how much he has to suffer before he can lose his family’s vice of self-interest. Much of his moral education is the result of the forbearance and good will of Mark Tapley, whose moral strength grows in proportion to its being opposed. The worse-off he becomes and the more danger and difficulty there is, the more he rises to the challenge. Mark Tapley is a kind of embodiment of the free moral will, whose force and significance in the book come from continuing acts of self-asserting goodness.

As with Martin, moral problems in Dickens are usually entangled with the question of families. Dickens is often thought to be a sort of honorary patron saint of the family, a writer whose novels invariably and inevitably end in a scene of domestic bliss. But as the dreadful families of this novel show, this is far from the case. No one would want to be born a Chuzzlewit or a Pecksniff. The opening chapter, with its dated puns on Victorian terms for pawnbroker’s shops and going hungry – ‘my uncle’s’, ‘dining with Duke Humphrey’ – sometimes puts readers off, but it is an important one, not just for its attack on snobbery (the Chuzzlewits believe themselves to be descended from the Lord No Zoo), but also because it raises in the strongest possible form the book’s central concern with inheritance. Inheritance can be a matter of money, as in the fight over old Martin’s will, but Dickens is also troubled by the inheritance of family characteristics and dispositions. In particular there seems to be a deep anxiety in the book about the relation of fathers and sons. In seeking to explain the ‘sordid coarseness and brutality’ of Jonas Chuzzlewit, Dickens claims him ‘as the legitimate issue of the father upon whom those vices are seen to recoil’. It is striking that in one of the key phrases he uses to describe the power of inheritance and upbringing – ‘As we sow, we reap’ – Dickens is echoing a favourite phrase of his own improvident father.

The first chapter also reminds us how radical a writer Dickens was, and he rarely loses a chance in the book to contrast rich and poor to the latter’s advantage, as in the description of the steerage passengers travelling to the New World ‘with infinitely less of complaint and querulousness and infinitely more of mutual assistance and general kindness . . . than in many brilliant ballrooms’. But it was a radicalism that had received an apparent setback in Dickens’s deep disappointment with the USA. Although it had representative democracy and personal liberty, with none of the aristocratic corruption and privilege that Dickens so detested in England, America also had a supremely powerful, brutal and exploitative economic system, barely distinguishable from legalised crime. Dickens did not become a reactionary or conservative in response to this, but started to examine and depict (and laugh at) those very forces that had so shocked and horrified him, his commitment to political and social reform leading him to question not just the abuses of the capitalist system but the very system itself.

It is one of the great wonders and mysteries of Dickens’s writing that he was able to create novels of such satirical force without falling into the satirist’s traditional melancholy and misanthropy, that he could be so serious and so funny at the same time. The novel, unlike Martin Chuzzlewit in the hell-hole of Eden, never despairs and there is a deep confidence in ordinary human capacity that survives and indeed is strengthened at the very blackest moments of the novel. It stems perhaps from Dickens’s sense of the absurdity of so many human characteristics and institutions. To see something as absurd, even if absurdly powerful, is the beginning of a recognition that there is nothing permanent or inevitable about it. The author and critic Walter Benjamin said that the wisest thing that fairy-stories teach us is ‘to meet the forces of the mythical world with cunning and high spirits’. A similar belief in practical intelligence and good humour in the face of Pecksniff, the Anglo-Bengalee, Jonas Chuzzlewit and their kind, fills the pages of Martin Chuzzlewit.

It is, then, the comedy of the book that is most to be treasured, and there are many joys awaiting the reader of Martin Chuzzlewit: the picture of Chevy Slyme ‘shambling with his legs’; Mrs Brick’s lectures on ‘The Philosophy of Vegetables’; Mrs Hominy ‘talking deep truths in a melodious snuffle’; best of all, perhaps, Mrs Gamp’s, ‘He’d make a lovely corpse.’ There is the remarkable figure of Chuffey, like a character in a play by Samuel Beckett, ‘looking at nothing with eyes that saw nothing, and a face that meant nothing’. There is Mr Nadgett who, in another scene concerned with the power and self-destructive force of writing, writes letters to himself:

and when he found them in his pocket, put them in the fire, with such distrust and caution that he would bend down to watch the crumpled tinder while it floated upward, as if his mind misgave him, that the mystery it contained might come out at the chimney-pot.

And there is the wonderful anecdote of the Viscount at Tigg Montague’s dinner-party, who insists that the great failure of Shakespeare’s plays is their lack of female legs:

There’s a lot of feet in Shakespeare’s verse, but there ain’t any legs worth mentioning in Shakespeare’s plays, are there Pip? Desdemona, Lady Macbeth, and all the rest of ’em, whatever their names are, might as well have no legs at all, for anything the audience know about it, Pip . . . What’s the legitimate object of the drama, Pip? Human nature. What are legs? Human nature. Then let us have plenty of leg pieces, Pip.

But any anthology of the best parts of a Dickens novel is in danger of becoming as long as the book itself. Dickens when he wrote the book said that he felt it was ‘in a hundred points immeasurably the best of my stories’. Millions of readers have agreed.

John Bowen

University of Keele

further reading

Biography

There are some good modern biographies, in particular:

Peter Ackroyd, Dickens , London 1990

Edgar Johnson, Charles Dickens: His Tragedy and Triumph, New York 1952, revised 1977

Fred Kaplan, Charles Dickens, London 1988

But the best of all is by Dickens’s friend John Forster, The Life of Charles Dickens, London 1872–4 (often reprinted)

Criticism

G. K. Chesterton, Charles Dickens, London 1906

G. K. Chesterton, Appreciations and Criticisms of the Work of Dickens, London 1911

George Gissing, The Immortal Dickens, London 1925

George Gissing, Critical Studies of the Works of Charles Dickens, London 1926

John Lucas, The Melancholy Man, London 1970

Steven Marcus, Dickens: From Pickwick to Dombey, London 1965

J. Hillis Miller, Charles Dickens: The World of his Novels, Harvard 1958

Michael Slater, Dickens and Women, London 1983

Grahame Smith, Dickens, Money and Society, California 1968

Raymond Williams, The English Novel from Dickens to Lawrence, London 1970

Angus Wilson, The World of Charles Dickens, London 1970

Dickens’s American Notes for General Circulation (1843) provides a fascinating comparison with the American sections of Martin Chuzzlewit. The story can be further pursued in volumes three and four of the magnificent Pilgrim edition of Dickens’s letters, edited by Madeline House, Graham Storey and Kathleen Tillotson, which contain all Dickens’s surviving correspondence from this period.

chapter i

Introductory, concerning the pedigree of the Chuzzlewit family

As no lady or gentleman, with any claims to polite breeding, can possibly sympathise with the Chuzzlewit Family without being first assured of the extreme antiquity of the race, it is a great satisfaction to know that it undoubtedly descended in a direct line from Adam and Eve; and was, in the very earliest times, closely connected with the agricultural interest. If it should ever be urged by grudging and malicious persons, that a Chuzzlewit, in any period of the family history, displayed an overweening amount of family pride, surely the weakness will be considered not only pardonable but laudable, when the immense superiority of the house to the rest of mankind, in respect of this its ancient origin, is taken into account.

It is remarkable that as there was, in the oldest family of which we have any record, a murderer and a vagabond, so we never fail to meet, in the records of all old families, with innumerable repetitions of the same phase of character. Indeed, it may be laid down as a general principle, that the more extended the ancestry, the greater the amount of violence and vagabondism; for in ancient days those two amusements, combining a wholesome excitement with a promising means of repairing shattered fortunes, were at once the ennobling pursuit and the healthful recreation of the Quality of this land.

Consequently, it is a source of inexpressible comfort and happiness to find, that in various periods of our history, the Chuzzlewits were actively connected with divers slaughterous conspiracies and bloody frays. It is further recorded of them, that being clad from head to heel in steel of proof, they did on many occasions lead their leather-jerkined soldiers to the death with invincible courage, and afterwards return home gracefully to their relations and friends.

There can be no doubt that at least one Chuzzlewit came over with William the Conqueror. It does not appear that this illustrious ancestor ‘came over’¹ that monarch, to employ the vulgar phrase, at any subsequent period: inasmuch as the Family do not seem to have been ever greatly distinguished by the possession of landed estate. And it is well known that for the bestowal of that kind of property upon his favourites, the liberality and gratitude of the Norman were as remarkable as those virtues are usually found to be in great men when they give away what belongs to other people.

Perhaps in this place the history may pause to congratulate itself upon the enormous amount of bravery, wisdom, eloquence, virtue, gentle birth, and true nobility, that appears to have come into England with the Norman Invasion: an amount which the genealogy of every ancient family lends its aid to swell, and which would beyond all question have been found to be just as great, and to the full as prolific in giving birth to long lines of chivalrous descendants, boastful of their origin, even though William the Conqueror had been William the Conquered; a change of circumstances which, it is quite certain, would have made no manner of difference in this respect.

There was unquestionably a Chuzzlewit in the Gunpowder Plot, if indeed the arch-traitor, Fawkes himself, were not a scion of this remarkable stock; as he might easily have been, supposing another Chuzzlewit to have emigrated to Spain in the previous generation, and there intermarried with a Spanish lady, by whom he had issue, one olive-complectioned son. This probable conjecture is strengthened, if not absolutely confirmed, by a fact which cannot fail to be interesting to those who are curious in tracing the progress of hereditary tastes through the lives of their unconscious inheritors. It is a notable circumstance that in these later times, many Chuzzlewits, being unsuccessful in other pursuits, have, without the smallest rational hope of enriching themselves, or any conceivable reason, set up as coalmerchants; and have, month after month, continued gloomily to watch a small stock of coals, without in any one instance negotiating with a purchaser. The remarkable similarity between this course of proceeding and that adopted by their Great Ancestor beneath the vaults of the Parliament House at Westminster, is too obvious and too full of interest, to stand in need of comment.

It is also clearly proved by the oral traditions of the Family, that there existed, at some one period of its history which is not distinctly stated, a matron of such destructive principles, and so familiarised to the use and composition of inflammatory and combustible engines, that she was called ‘The Match Maker’: by which nickname and byword she is recognised in the Family legends to this day. Surely there can be no reasonable doubt that this was the Spanish lady, the mother of Chuzzlewit Fawkes.²

But there is one other piece of evidence, bearing immediate reference to their close connection with this memorable event in English History, which must carry conviction, even to a mind (if such a mind there be) remaining unconvinced by these presumptive proofs.

There was, within a few years, in the possession of a highly respectable and in every way credible and unimpeachable member of the Chuzzlewit Family (for his bitterest enemy never dared to hint at his being otherwise than a wealthy man), a dark lantern of undoubted antiquity; rendered still more interesting by being, in shape and pattern, extremely like such as are in use at the present day. Now this gentleman, since deceased, was at all times ready to make oath, and did again and again set forth upon his solemn asseveration, that he had frequently heard his grandmother say, when contemplating this venerable relic, ‘Aye, aye! This was carried by my fourth son on the fifth of November, when he was a Guy Fawkes.’ These remarkable words wrought (as well they might) a strong impression on his mind, and he was in the habit of repeating them very often. The just interpretation which they bear, and the conclusion to which they lead, are triumphant and irresistible. The old lady, naturally strong-minded, was nevertheless frail and fading; she was notoriously subject to that confusion of ideas, or, to say the least, of speech, to which age and garrulity are liable. The slight, the very slight, confusion apparent in these expressions is manifest, and is ludicrously easy of correction. ‘Aye, aye,’ quoth she, and it will be observed that no emendation whatever is necessary to be made in these two initiative remarks, ‘Aye, aye! This lantern was carried by my forefather’ – not fourth son, which is preposterous – ‘on the fifth of November. And he was Guy Fawkes.’ Here we have a remark at once consistent, clear, natural, and in strict accordance with the character of the speaker. Indeed the anecdote is so plainly susceptible of this meaning and no other, that it would be hardly worth recording in its original state, were it not a proof of what may be (and very often is) affected not only in historical prose but in imaginative poetry, by the exercise of a little ingenious labour on the part of a commentator.

It has been said that there is no instance, in modern times, of a Chuzzlewit having been found on terms of intimacy with the Great. But here again the sneering detractors who weave such miserable figments from their malicious brains, are stricken dumb by evidence. For letters are yet in the possession of various branches of the family, from which it distinctly appears, being stated in so many words, that one Diggory Chuzzlewit was in the habit of perpetually dining with Duke Humphrey.³ So constantly was he a guest at that nobleman’s table, indeed; and so unceasingly were His Grace’s hospitality and companionship forced, as it were, upon him; that we find him uneasy, and full of constraint and reluctance: writing his friends to the effect that if they fail to do so and so by bearer, he will have no choice but to dine again with Duke Humphrey: and expressing himself in a very marked and extraordinary manner as one surfeited of High Life and Gracious Company.

It has been rumoured, and it is needless to say the rumour originated in the same base quarters, that a certain male Chuzzlewit, whose birth must be admitted to be involved in some obscurity, was of very mean and low descent. How stands the proof? When the son of that individual, to whom the secret of his father’s birth was supposed to have been communicated by his father in his lifetime, lay upon his deathbed, this question was put to him in a distinct, solemn, and formal way: ‘Toby Chuzzlewit, who was your grandfather?’ To which he, with his last breath, no less distinctly, solemnly, and formally replied: and his words were taken down at the time, and signed by six witnesses, each with his name and address in full: ‘The Lord No Zoo.’ It may be said – it has been said, for human wickedness has no limits – that there is no Lord of that name, and that among the titles which have become extinct, none at all resembling this, in sound even, is to be discovered. But what is the irresistible inference? – Rejecting a theory broached by some well-meaning but mistaken persons, that this Mr Toby Chuzzlewit’s grandfather, to judge from his name, must surely have been a Mandarin (which is wholly insupportable, for there is no pretence of his grandmother ever having been out of this country, or of any Mandarin having been in it within some years of his father’s birth; except those in the tea-shops, which cannot for a moment be regarded as having any bearing on the question, one way or other), rejecting this hypothesis, is it not manifest that Mr Toby Chuzzlewit had either received the name imperfectly from his father, or that he had forgotten it, or that he had mispronounced it? and that even at the recent period in question, the Chuzzlewits were connected by a bend sinister, or kind of heraldic over-the-left, with some unknown noble and illustrious House?

From documentary evidence, yet preserved in the family, the fact is clearly established that in the comparatively modern days of the Diggory Chuzzlewit before mentioned, one of its members had attained to very great wealth and influence. Throughout such fragments of his correspondence as have escaped the ravages of the moths (who, in right of their extensive absorption of the contents of deeds and papers, may be called the general registers of the Insect World), we find him making constant reference to an uncle,⁴ in respect of whom he would seem to have entertained great expectations, as he was in the habit of seeking to propitiate his favour by presents of plate, jewels, books, watches, and other valuable articles. Thus, he writes on one occasion to his brother in reference to a gravy-spoon, the brother’s property, which he (Diggory) would appear to have borrowed or otherwise possessed himself of: ‘Do not be angry, I have parted with it – to my uncle.’ On another occasion he expresses himself in a similar manner with regard to a child’s mug which had been entrusted to him to get repaired. On another occasion he says, ‘I have bestowed upon that irresistible uncle of mine everything I ever possessed.’ And that he was in the habit of paying long and constant visits to this gentleman at his mansion, if, indeed, he did not wholly reside there, is manifest from the following sentence: ‘With the exception of the suit of clothes I carry about with me, the whole of my wearing apparel is at present at my uncle’s.’ This gentleman’s patronage and influence must have been very extensive, for his nephew writes, ‘His interest is too high’ – ‘It is too much’ – ‘It is tremendous’ – and the like. Still it does not appear (which is strange) to have procured for him any lucrative post at court or elsewhere, or to have conferred upon him any other distinction than that which was necessarily included in the countenance of so great a man, and the being invited by him to certain entertainment’s, so splendid and costly in their nature, that he calls them ‘Golden Balls’.⁵

It is needless to multiply instances of the high and lofty station, and the vast importance of the Chuzzlewits, at different periods. If it came within the scope of reasonable probability that further proofs were required, they might be heaped upon each other until they formed an Alps of testimony, beneath which the boldest scepticism should be crushed and beaten flat. As a goodly tumulus is already collected, and decently battened up above the Family grave, the present chapter is content to leave it as it is: merely adding, by way of a final spadeful, that many Chuzzlewits, both male and female, are proved to demonstration, on the faith of letters written by their own mothers, to have had chiselled noses, undeniable chins, fonns that might have served the sculptor for a model, exquisitely-turned limbs and polished foreheads of so transparent a texture that the blue veins might be seen branching off in various directions, like so many roads on an ethereal map. This fact in itself, though it had been a solitary one, would have utterly settled and clenched the business in hand; for it is well known, on the authority of all the books which treat of such matters, that every one of these phenomena, but especially that of the chiselling, are invariably peculiar to, and only make themselves apparent in, persons of the very best condition.

This history having, to its own perfect satisfaction, (and, consequently, to the full contentment of all its readers,) proved the Chuzzlewits to have had an origin, and to have been at one time or other of an importance which cannot fail to render them highly improving and acceptable acquaintance to all right-minded individuals, may now proceed in earnest with its task. And having shown that they must have had, by reason of their ancient birth, a pretty large share in the foundation and increase of the human family, it will one day become its province to submit, that such of its members as shall be introduced in these pages, have still many counterparts and prototypes in the Great World about us. At present it contents itself with remarking, in a general way, on this head: Firstly, that it may be safely asserted, and yet without implying any direct participation in the Monboddo doctrine⁶ touching the probability of the human race having once been monkeys, that men do play very strange and extraordinary tricks. Secondly, and yet without trenching on the Blumenbach theory⁷ as to the descendants of Adam having a vast number of qualities which belong more particularly to swine than to any other class of animals in the creation, that some men certainly are remarkable for taking uncommon good care of themselves.

chapter ii

Wherein certain persons are presented to the reader, with whom he may, if he please, become better acquainted

It was pretty late in the autumn of the year, when the declining sun struggling through the mist which had obscured it all day, looked brightly down upon a little Wiltshire village, within an easy journey of the fair old town of Salisbury.

Like a sudden flash of memory or spirit kindling up the mind of an old man, it shed a glory upon the scene, in which its departed youth and freshness seemed to live again. The wet grass sparkled in the light; the scanty patches of verdure in the hedges – where a few green twigs yet stood together bravely, resisting to the last the tyranny of nipping winds and early frosts – took heart and brightened up; the stream which had been dull and sullen all day long, broke out into a cheerful smile; the birds began to chirp and twitter on the naked boughs, as though the hopeful creatures half believed that winter had gone by, and spring had come already. The vane upon the tapering spire of the old church glistened from its lofty station in sympathy with the general gladness; and from the ivy-shaded windows such gleams of light shone back upon the glowing sky, that it seemed as if the quiet buildings were the hoarding-place of twenty summers, and all their ruddiness and warmth were stored within.

Even those tokens of the season which emphatically whispered of the coming winter, graced the landscape, and, for the moment, tinged its livelier features with no oppressive air of sadness. The fallen leaves, with which the ground was strewn, gave forth a pleasant fragrance, and subduing all harsh sounds of distant feet and wheels created a repose in gentle unison with the light scattering of seed hither and thither by the distant husband man, and with the noiseless passage of the plough as it turned up the rich brown earth, and wrought a graceful pattern in the stubbled fields. On the motionless branches of some trees, autumn berries hung like clusters of coral beads, as in those fabled orchards where the fruits were jewels; others stripped of all their garniture, stood, each the centre of its little heap of bright red leaves, watching their slow decay; others again, still wearing theirs, had them all crunched and crackled up, as though they had been burnt; about the stems of some were piled, in ruddy mounds, the apples they had borne that year; while others (hardy evergreens this class) showed somewhat stern and gloomy in their vigour, as charged by nature with the admonition that it is not to her more sensitive and joyous favourites she grants the longest term of life. Still athwart their darker boughs, the sunbeams struck out paths of deeper gold; and the red light, mantling in among their swarthy branches, used them as foils to set its brightness off, and aid the lustre of the dying day.

A moment, and its glory was no more. The sun went down beneath the long dark lines of hill and cloud which piled up in the west an airy city, wall heaped on wall, and battlement on battlement; the light was all withdrawn; the shining church turned cold and dark; the stream forgot to smile; the birds were silent; and the gloom of winter dwelt on everything.

An evening wind uprose too, and the slighter branches cracked and rattled as they moved, in skeleton dances, to its moaning music. The withering leaves no longer quiet, hurried to and fro in search of shelter from its chill pursuit; the labourer unyoked his horses, and with head bent down, trudged briskly home beside them; and from the cottage windows lights began to glance and wink upon the darkening fields.

Then the village forge came out in all its bright importance. The lusty bellows roared Ha ha! to the clear fire, which roared in turn, and bade the shining sparks dance gaily to the merry clinking of the hammers on the anvil. The gleaming iron, in its emulation, sparkled too, and shed its red-hot gems around profusely. The strong smith and his men dealt such strokes upon their work, as made even the melancholy night rejoice, and brought a glow into its dark face as it hovered about the door and windows, peeping curiously in above the shoulders of a dozen loungers. As to this idle company, there they stood, spell-bound by the place, and, casting now and then a glance upon the darkness in their rear, settled their lazy elbows more at ease upon the sill, and leaned a little further in: no more disposed to tear themselves away than if they had been born to cluster round the blazing hearth like so many crickets.

Out upon the angry wind! how from sighing, it began to bluster round the merry forge, banging at the wicket, and grumbling in the chimney, as if it bullied the jolly bellows for doing anything to order. And what an impotent swaggerer it was too, for all its noise; for if it had any influence on that hoarse companion, it was but to make him roar his cheerful song the louder, and by consequence to make the fire burn the brighter, and the sparks to dance more gaily yet: at length, they whizzed so madly round and round, that it was too much for such a surly wind to bear: so off it flew with a howl giving the old sign before the ale-house door such a cuff as it went, that the Blue Dragon was more rampant than usual ever afterwards, and indeed, before Christmas, reared clean out of its crazy frame.

It was small tyranny for a respectable wind to go wreaking its vengeance on such poor creatures as the fallen leaves, but this wind happening to come up with a great heap of them just after venting its humour on the insulted Dragon, did so disperse and scatter them that they fled away, pell mell, some here, some there, rolling over each other, whirling round and round upon their thin edges, taking frantic flights into the air, and playing all manner of extraordinary gambols in the extremity of their distress. Nor was this enough for its malicious fury: for not content with driving them abroad, it charged small parties of them and hunted them into the wheel wright’s saw-pit, and below the planks and timbers in the yard, and, scattering the sawdust in the air, it looked for them underneath, and when it did meet with any, whew! how it drove them on and followed at their heels!

The scared leaves only flew the faster for all this, and a giddy chase it was: for they got into unfrequented places, where there was no outlet, and where their pursuer kept them eddying round and round at his pleasure; and they crept under the eaves of houses, and clung tightly to the sides of hay-ricks, like bats; and tore in at open chamber windows, and cowered close to hedges; and in short went anywhere for safety. But the oddest feat they achieved was, to take advantage of the sudden opening of Mr Pecksniff’s front-door, to dash wildly into his passage; whither the wind following close upon them, and finding the back-door open, incontinently blew out the lighted candle held by Miss Pecksniff, and slammed the front-door against Mr Pecksniff who was at that moment entering, with such violence, that in the twinkling of an eye he lay on his back at the bottom of the steps. Being by this time weary of such trifling performances, the boisterous rover hurried away rejoicing, roaring over moor and meadow, hill and flat, until it got out to sea, where it met with other winds similarly disposed, and made a night of it.

In the meantime Mr Pecksniff, having received from a sharp angle in the bottom step but one, that sort of knock on the head which lights up, for the patient’s entertainment, an imaginary general illumination of very bright short-sixes,¹ lay placidly staring at his own street-door. And it would seem to have been more suggestive in its aspect than street-doors usually are; for he continued to lie there, rather a lengthy and unreasonable time, without so much as wondering whether he was hurt or no: neither, when Miss Pecksniff inquired through the key-hole in a shrill voice, which might have belonged to a wind in its teens, ‘Who’s there’ did he make any reply: nor, when Miss Pecksniff opened the door again, and shading the candle with her hand, peered out, and looked provokingly round him, and about him, and over him, and everywhere but at him did he offer any remark, or indicate in any manner the least hint of a desire to be picked up.

I see you,’ cried Miss Pecksniff, to the ideal inflicter of a runaway knock. ‘You’ll catch it, sir!’

Still Mr Pecksniff, perhaps from having caught it already, said nothing.

‘You’re round the corner now,’ cried Miss Pecksniff. She said it at a venture, but there was appropriate matter in it too; for Mr Pecksniff, being in the act of extinguishing the candles before mentioned pretty rapidly, and of reducing the number of brass knobs on his street-door from four or five hundred (which had previously been juggling of their own accord before his eyes in a very novel manner) to a dozen or so, might in one sense have been said to be coming round the corner, and just turning it.

With a sharply-delivered warning relative to the cage and the constable, and the stocks and the gallows, Miss Pecksniff was about to close the door again, when Mr Pecksniff (being still at the bottom of the steps) raised himself on one elbow, and sneezed.

‘That voice!’ cried Miss Pecksniff. ‘My parent!’

At this exclamation, another Miss Pecksniff bounced out of the parlour: and the two Miss Pecksniffs, with many incoherent expressions, dragged Mr Pecksniff into an upright posture.

‘Pa!’ they cried in concert. ‘Pa! Speak, Pa! Do not look so wild my dearest Pa!’

But as a gentleman’s looks, in such a case of all others, are by no means under his own control, Mr Pecksniff continued to keep his mouth and his eyes very wide open, and to drop his lower jaw, somewhat after the manner of a toy nut-cracker: and as his hat had fallen off, and his face was pale, and his hair erect, and his coat muddy, the spectacle he presented vas so very doleful, that neither of the Miss Pecksniffs could repress an involuntary screech.

‘That’ll do,’ said Mr Pecksniff. ‘I’m better.’

‘He’s come to himself!’ cried the youngest Miss Pecksniff.

‘He speaks again!’ exclaimed the eldest.

With these joyful words they kissed Mr Pecksniff on either cheek; and bore him into the house. Presently, the youngest Miss Pecksniff ran out again to pick up his hat, his brown paper parcel, his umbrella, his gloves, and other small articles: and that done, and the door closed, both young ladies applied themselves to tending Mr Pecksniff’s wounds in the back parlour.

They were not very serious in their nature: being limited to abrasions on what the eldest Miss Pecksniff called ‘the knobby parts’ of her parent’s anatomy, such as his knees and elbows, and to the development of an entirely new organ, unknown to phrenologists, on the back of his head. These injuries having been comforted externally, with patches of pickled brown paper, and Mr Pecksniff having been comforted internally, with some stiff brandy-and-water, the eldest Miss Pecksniff sat down to make the tea, which was all ready. In the meantime the youngest Miss Pecksniff brought from the kitchen a smoking dish of ham and eggs, and, setting the same before her father, took up her station on a low stool at his feet: thereby bringing her eyes on a level with the teaboard.

It must not be inferred from this position of humility, that the youngest Miss Pecksniff was so young as to be, as one may say, forced to sit upon a stool, by reason of the shortness of her legs. Miss Pecksniff sat upon a stool because of her simplicity and innocence, which were very great: very great. Miss Pecksniff sat upon a stool because she was all girlishness, and playfulness, and wildness, and kittenish buoyancy. She was the most arch and at the same time the most artless creature, was the youngest Miss Pecksniff, that you can possibly imagine. It was her great charm. She was too fresh and guileless, and too full of child-like vivacity, was the youngest Miss Pecksniff, to wear combs in her hair, or to turn it up, or to frizzle it, or braid it. She wore it in a crop, a loosely flowing crop, which had so many rows of curls in it, that the top row was only one curl. Moderately buxom was her shape, and quite womanly too; but sometimes – yes, sometimes – she even wore a pinafore; and how charming that was! oh! she was indeed ‘a gushing thing’ (as a young gentleman had observed in verse, in the Poet’s Corner of a provincial newspaper), was the youngest Miss Pecksniff!

Mr Pecksniff was a moral man: a grave man, a man of noble sentiments and speech: and he had had her christened Mercy. Mercy! oh, what a charming name for such a pure-souled being as the youngest Miss Pecksniff! Her sister’s name was Charity. There was a good thing! Mercy and Charity! And Charity, with her fine strong sense and her mild, yet not reproachful gravity, was so well named, and did so well set off and illustrate her sister! What a pleasant sight was that the contrast they presented: to see each loved and loving one sympathising with, and devoted to, and leaning on, and yet correcting and counter-checking, and, as it were, antidoting, the other! To behold each damsel in her very admiration of her sister, setting up in business for herself on an entirely different principle, and announcing no connection with over-the-way, and if the quality of goods at that establishment don’t please you, you are respectfully invited to favour me with a call! And the crowning circumstance of the whole delightful catalogue was, that both the fair creatures were so utterly unconscious of all this! They had no idea of it. They no more thought or dreamed of it than Mr Pecksniff did. Nature played them off against each other: they had no hand in it, the two Miss Pecksniffs.

It has been remarked that Mr Pecksniff was a moral man. So he was. Perhaps there never was a more moral man than Mr Pecksniff: especially in his conversation and correspondence. It was once said of him by a homely admirer, that he had a Fortunatus’s² purse of good sentiments in his inside. In this particular he was like the girl in the fairy tale, except that if they were not actual diamonds which fell from his lips, they were the very brightest paste, and shone prodigiously. He was a most exemplary man: fuller of virtuous precept than a copy-book. Some people likened him to a direction-post, which is always telling the way to a place, and never goes there: but these were his enemies, the shadows cast by his brightness; that was all. His very throat was moral. You saw a good deal of it. You looked over a very low fence of white cravat (whereof no man had ever beheld the tie for he fastened it behind), and there it lay, a valley between two jutting heights of collar, serene and whiskerless before you. It seemed to say, on the part of Mr Pecksniff, ‘There is no deception, ladies and gentlemen, all is peace, a holy calm pervades me.’ So did his hair, just grizzled with an iron-grey which was all brushed off his forehead, and stood bolt upright, or slightly drooped in kindred action with his heavy eyelids. So did his person which was sleek though free from corpulency. So did his manner, which was soft and oily in a word, even his plain black suit, and state of widower and dangling double eye-glass, all tended to the same purpose, and cried aloud, ‘Behold the moral Pecksniff!’

The brazen plate upon the door (which being Mr Pecksniff’s, could not lie) bore this inscription, ‘Pecksniff, Architect,’ to which Mr Pecksniff, on his cards of business, added, and Land Surveyor.’ In one sense, and only one, he may be said to have been a Land Surveyor on a pretty large scale, as an extensive prospect lay stretched out before the windows of his house. Of his architectural doings, nothing was clearly known, except that he had never designed or built anything; but it was generally understood that his knowledge of the science was almost awful in its profundity.

Mr Pecksniff’s professional engagements, indeed, were almost, if not entirely, confined to the reception of pupils; for the collection of rents, with which pursuit he occasionally varied and relieved his graver toils, can hardly be said to be a strictly architectural employment. His genius lay in ensnaring parents and guardians, and pocketing premiums. A young gentleman’s premium being paid, and the young gentleman come to Mr Pecksniff’s house, Mr Pecksniff borrowed his case of mathematical instruments (if silver-mounted or otherwise valuable); entreated him, from that moment, to consider himself one of the family; complimented him highly on his parents or guardians, as the case might be; and turned him loose in a spacious room on the two-pair front; where, in the company of certain drawing-boards, parallel rulers, very stiff-legged compasses, and two, or perhaps three, other young gentlemen, he improved himself, for three or five years, according to his articles, in making elevations of Salisbury Cathedral from every possible point of sight; and in constructing in the air a vast quantity of Castles, Houses of Parliament, and other Public Buildings. Perhaps in no place in the world were so many gorgeous edifices of this class erected as under Mr Pecksniff’s auspices; and if but one-twentieth part of the churches which were built in that front room, with one or other of the Miss Pecksniffs at the altar in the act of marrying the architect, could only be made available by the parliamentary commissioners, no more churches would be wanted for at least five centuries.

‘Even the worldly goods of which we have just disposed,’ said Mr Pecksniff, glancing round the table when he had finished, ‘even cream, sugar, tea, toast, ham, – ’

‘And eggs,’ suggested Charity in a low voice.

‘And eggs,’ said Mr Pecksniff, ‘even they have their moral. See how they come and go! Every pleasure is transitory. We can’t even eat, long. If we indulge in harmless fluids, we get the dropsy; if in exciting liquids, we get drunk. What a soothing reflection is that!’

‘Don’t say we get drunk, Pa,’ urged the eldest Miss Pecksniff.

‘When I say we, my dear,’ returned her father, ‘I mean mankind in general; the human race, considered as a body, and not as individuals. There is nothing personal in morality, my love. Even such a thing as this,’ said Mr Pecksniff, laying the fore-finger of his left hand upon the brown paper patch on the top of his head, ‘slight casual baldness though it be, reminds us that we are but’ – he was going to say ‘worms,’ but recollecting that worms were not remarkable for heads of hair, he substituted ‘flesh and blood.’

‘Which,’ cried Mr Pecksniff after a pause, during which he seemed to have been casting about for a new moral, and not quite successfully, ‘which is also very soothing. Mercy, my dear, stir the fire and throw up the cinders.’

The young lady obeyed, and having done so, resumed her stool, reposed one arm upon her father’s knee, and laid her blooming cheek upon it. Miss Charity drew her chair nearer the fire, as one prepared for conversation, and looked towards her father.

‘Yes,’ said Mr Pecksniff, after a short pause, during which he had been silently smiling, and shaking his head at the fire: ‘I have again been fortunate in the attainment

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1