Understanding Assurance and Salvation
By R Picirilli
()
About this ebook
R Picirilli
Dr. Robert E. Picirilli is former academic dean and professor of Greek and the New Testament studies at Free Will Baptist Bible College in Nashville, Tennessee. Since 1983, he as served as the General Editor of "The Randall House Bible Commentary" and contributed to several volumes within the series. His other published works include "Teacher, Leader, Shepherd"; "Grace, Faith, Free Will"; "Paul, the Apostle"'; and numerous other books and articles in denominational publications and theological journals.
Related to Understanding Assurance and Salvation
Related ebooks
Classical Arminianism: The Theology of Salvation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArminius Speaks: Essential Writings on Predestination, Free Will, and the Nature of God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrace Faith Free Will: Contrasting Views of Salvation: Calvinism & Arminianism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Salvation and Sovereignty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Discipleship: The Expression of Saving Faith: The Expression of Saving Faith Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJacobus Arminius Stands His Ground: A Declaration against High Calvinism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Nature of the Will in the Writings of Calvin and Arminius: A Comparative Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Evangelical and The Open Theist: Can Open Theism Find Its Place Within the Evangelical Community? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCalvinism Vs. Arminianism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Arminian and Baptist: Explorations in a Theological Tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Quest for Truth: Theology for Postmodern Times Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFree Will Revisited: A Respectful Response to Luther, Calvin, and Edwards Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jacob Arminius: The Man from Oudewater Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Monergism or Synergism: Is Salvation Cooperative or the Work of God Alone? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Atonement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/540 Questions About Arminianism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPerspectives on the Doctrine of God Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/540 Questions About Roman Catholicism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCalvinism: A Biblical and Theological Critique Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Anyone Can Be Saved: A Defense of “Traditional” Southern Baptist Soteriology Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Pious Sage in Job: Eliphaz in the Context of Wisdom Theodicy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDoes God Love Everyone?: The Heart of What's Wrong with Calvinism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Models of Premillennialism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Extent of the Atonement: A Historical and Critical Review Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/540 Questions about Church Membership and Discipline Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevisioning, Renewing, Rediscovering the Triune Center: Essays in Honor of Stanley J. Grenz Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Baptist at the Crossroads: The Atonement in the Writings of Richard Furman (1755-1825) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReclaiming the Center: Confronting Evangelical Accommodation in Postmodern Times Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Christianity For You
Winning the War in Your Mind: Change Your Thinking, Change Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Decluttering at the Speed of Life: Winning Your Never-Ending Battle with Stuff Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love that Lasts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Enoch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Updated and Expanded Edition: When to Say Yes, How to Say No To Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good Boundaries and Goodbyes: Loving Others Without Losing the Best of Who You Are Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bible Recap: A One-Year Guide to Reading and Understanding the Entire Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wild at Heart Expanded Edition: Discovering the Secret of a Man's Soul Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Law of Connection: Lesson 10 from The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Stories We Tell: Every Piece of Your Story Matters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Anxious for Nothing: Finding Calm in a Chaotic World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Uninvited: Living Loved When You Feel Less Than, Left Out, and Lonely Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'll Start Again Monday: Break the Cycle of Unhealthy Eating Habits with Lasting Spiritual Satisfaction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Changes That Heal: Four Practical Steps to a Happier, Healthier You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Present Over Perfect: Leaving Behind Frantic for a Simpler, More Soulful Way of Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story: The Bible as One Continuing Story of God and His People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Girl, Wash Your Face: Stop Believing the Lies About Who You Are so You Can Become Who You Were Meant to Be Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5NIV, Holy Bible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Grief Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Workbook: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unoffendable: How Just One Change Can Make All of Life Better (updated with two new chapters) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Lead When You're Not in Charge: Leveraging Influence When You Lack Authority Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Good Girl's Guide to Great Sex: Creating a Marriage That's Both Holy and Hot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5New Morning Mercies: A Daily Gospel Devotional Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Understanding Assurance and Salvation
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Understanding Assurance and Salvation - R Picirilli
Preface
Calvinism is the name of the theology of salvation traced to John Calvin (1509-64), the leading theologian of the early Protestant Reformation, a magisterial reformer of almost as much importance as Martin Luther himself. Arminianism represents the thinking of Jacobus Arminius (1560-1609), a Dutch thinker who resisted some of the forms of Calvinism.
Since the Calvinistic-dominated Synod of Dort in 1618-19, it has become customary to summarize the differences between the two schools of thought using the acrostic TULIP.
T is for Total Depravity. Calvin insisted that humans are so depraved, following original sin, that they are permanently disabled from responding to God until He first regenerates them. Arminius did not disagree about the depravity, but he understood the Bible to teach that God’s pre-regenerating grace enables the depraved person—still possessing freedom of the will as part of his constitutional makeup—to respond positively or negatively to the offer of salvation in Christ.
U is for Unconditional Election. Calvin believed that God by predestination chose some to be saved and the rest to be lost, eternally, and unconditionally. Arminius agreed that it is biblical to speak of the election as eternal, but he held that it is likewise biblical to speak of election as based on the saving faith of the individuals, exercised in time.
L is for Limited Atonement. Calvin taught that Christ died only for those whom God had unconditionally elected. Arminius cited a wealth of biblical evidence that Christ died for the entire human race and thus provided salvation for all—applied, however, only to those who respond in faith to the gospel.
I is for Irresistible Grace. Calvin’s view was that elected persons are regenerated by the gracious work of the Holy Spirit without their awareness or cooperation; only after this new birth can they receive faith as a gift from God. Arminius understood the Bible to teach, instead, that the individual, enabled by the Spirit but not yet regenerated, must willingly believe in Christ in order to be saved.
P is for Perseverance. Calvin said that all who are elected will necessarily persevere in salvation. Arminius, though he did not develop this doctrine as fully as the others, referred to biblical teachings that ought to make one cautious, passages that fall short of guaranteeing that all who are born again will certainly persevere to the end.
This little book treats the views of Arminius, and of more recent followers of his thinking—including this writer—on this fifth subject.
CHAPTER ONE
Arminianism and Conditional Perseverance
As I have said in the preface, Arminius himself and his first followers¹ avoided a clear conclusion on the subject of perseverance. But they raised the question, and the natural implications of their non-predestinarian view of salvation, even at that early stage, tended to question whether Calvinism’s assumption of necessary perseverance was truly biblical.
Arminius’ opinion on the subject can be captured in this relatively brief statement on the subject:
My sentiments respecting the perseverance of the Saints are, that those persons who have been grafted into Christ by true faith, and have thus been made partakers of his life-giving Spirit, possess sufficient powers [or strength] to … gain the victory over those enemies—yet not without the assistance of the grace of the same Holy Spirit…. So that it is not possible for them, by any of the cunning craftiness or power of Satan, to be either seduced or dragged out of the hands of Christ. But I think it is useful and will be quite necessary in our first convention, to institute a diligent enquiry from the Scriptures, whether it is not possible for some individuals through negligence to desert the commencement of their existence in Christ, to cleave again to the present evil world, to decline from the sound doctrine which was once delivered to them, to lose a good conscience, and to cause Divine grace to be ineffectual.
Though I here openly and ingenuously affirm, I never taught that a true believer can either totally or finally fall away from the faith, and perish; yet I will not conceal, that there are passages of Scripture which seem to me to wear this aspect; and those answers to them which I have been permitted to see, are not of such a kind as to approve themselves on all points to my understanding.²
From a historical perspective, Arminius insisted that the denial of such a possibility "was never, from the very times of the apostles down to the present day, accounted by the church as a catholic