Operator Methods in Quantum Mechanics
()
About this ebook
Read more from Martin Schechter
Dover Books on Mathematics Operator Methods in Quantum Mechanics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Operator Methods in Quantum Mechanics
Related ebooks
Introduction to Singular Perturbations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSplines and Variational Methods Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Some Mathematical Methods of Physics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFirst-Order Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Complex Analysis Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Graduate Course in Probability Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Introduction to the Quantum Theory: Third Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nuclear Physics: Principles and Applications Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Combinatorial Optimization: Networks and Matroids Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Theory of Splines and Their Applications: Mathematics in Science and Engineering: A Series of Monographs and Textbooks, Vol. 38 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDynamics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Complex Numbers: Lattice Simulation and Zeta Function Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTheory of Viscoelasticity: Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatistical Physics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Statistical Mechanics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Adaptive Processes in Economic Systems by Roy E Murphy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIV: Analysis of Operators Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mathematics in Physics and Engineering Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGroup Theory in Quantum Mechanics: An Introduction to Its Present Usage Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFundamentals of Quantum Mechanics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNonlinearity and Functional Analysis: Lectures on Nonlinear Problems in Mathematical Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuantum Theory: Aggregates of Particles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVariable Phase Approach to Potential Scattering by F Calogero Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsI: Functional Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dynamic Random Walks: Theory and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Theory of Splines and Their Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMicrohydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Physics For You
How to Diagnose and Fix Everything Electronic, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quantum Physics: A Beginners Guide to How Quantum Physics Affects Everything around Us Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quantum Physics for Beginners Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Effect: Quantum Entanglement, Science's Strangest Phenomenon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Step By Step Mixing: How to Create Great Mixes Using Only 5 Plug-ins Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Physics I For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Theory of Relativity: And Other Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Introducing Quantum Theory: A Graphic Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Teach Quantum Physics to Your Dog Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Reality Revolution: The Mind-Blowing Movement to Hack Your Reality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Physics of Wall Street: A Brief History of Predicting the Unpredictable Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Moving Through Parallel Worlds To Achieve Your Dreams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End of Everything: (Astrophysically Speaking) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Weird: Why Everything You Thought You Knew about Quantum Physics Is Different Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Welcome to the Universe: An Astrophysical Tour Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What the Bleep Do We Know!?™: Discovering the Endless Possibilities for Altering Your Everyday Reality Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Physics Essentials For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vibration and Frequency: How to Get What You Want in Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Time Travel in Einstein's Universe: The Physical Possibilities of Travel Through Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Feynman Lectures Simplified 1A: Basics of Physics & Newton's Laws Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5String Theory For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Operator Methods in Quantum Mechanics
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Operator Methods in Quantum Mechanics - Martin Schechter
Mechanics
Operator Methods
in
Quantum Mechanics
Martin Schechter
University of California, Irvine
DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC.
Mineola, New York
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by Elsevier North Holland, Inc.
All rights reserved under Pan American and International Copyright Conventions.
Bibliographical Note
This Dover edition, first published in 2002, is an unabridged republication of the work originally published in 1981 by Elsevier North Holland, Inc., New York.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Schechter, Martin.
Operator methods in quantum mechanics / Martin Schechter.
p. cm.
Originally published: New York: North Holland, c1981.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
eISBN 13: 978-0-486-15004-8
1. Operator theory. 2. Quantum theory. I. Title.
QC174.17.O63S33 2002
515’.724—dc21
2002031300
Manufactured in the United States of America
Dover Publications, Inc., 31 East 2nd Street, Mineola, N.Y. 11501
BS″D
To the memory of my parents, Z″L,
Joshua and Rose
who left this world before their nachas was complete.
Contents
Preface
Acknowledgments
A Message to the Reader
List of Symbols
Chapter 1. One-Dimensional Motion
1.1. Position
1.2. Mathematical Expectation
1.3. Momentum
1.4. Energy
1.5. Observables
1.6. Operators
1.7. Functions of Observables
1.8. Self-Adjoint Operators
1.9. Hilbert Space
1.10. The Spectral Theorem
Exercises
Chapter 2. The Spectrum
2.1. The Resolvent
2.2. Finding the Spectrum
2.3. The Position Operator
2.4. The Momentum Operator
2.5. The Energy Operator
2.6. The Potential
2.7. A Class of Functions
2.8. The Spectrum of H
Exercises
Chapter 3. The Essential Spectrum
3.1. An Example
3.2. A Calculation
3.3. Finding the Eigenvalues
3.4. The Domain of H
3.5. Back to Hilbert Space
3.6. Compact Operators
3.7. Relative Compactness
3.8. Proof of Theorem 3.7.5
Exercises
Chapter 4. The Negative Eigenvalues
4.1. The Possibilities
4.2. Forms Extensions
4.3. The Remaining Proofs
4.4. Negative Eigenvalues
4.5. Existence of Bound States
4.6. Existence of Infinitely Many Bound States
4.7. Existence of Only a Finite Number of Bound States
4.8. Another Criterion
Exercises
Chapter 5. Estimating the Spectrum
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Some Crucial Lemmas
5.3. A Lower Bound for the Spectrum
5.4. Lower Bounds for the Essential Spectrum
5.5. An Inequality
5.6. Bilinear Forms
5.7. Intervals Containing the Essential Spectrum
5.8. Coincidence of the Essential Spectrum with an Interval
5.9. The Harmonic Oscillator
5.10. The Morse Potential
Exercises
Chapter 6. Scattering Theory
6.1. Time Dependence
6.2. Scattering States
6.3. Properties of the Wave Operators
6.4. The Domains of the Wave Operators
6.5. Local Singularities
Exercises
Chapter 7. Long-Range Potentials
7.1. The Coulomb Potential
7.2. Some Examples
7.3. The Estimates
7.4. The Derivatives of V(x)
7.5. The Relationship Between Xt and V(x)
7.6. An Identity
7.7. The Reduction
7.8. Mollifiers
Exercises
Chapter 8. Time-Independent Theory
8.1. The Resolvent Method
8.2. The Theory
8.3. A Simple Criterion
8.4. The Application
Exercises
Chapter 9. Completeness
9.1. Definition
9.2. The Abstract Theory
9.3. Some Identities
9.4. Another Form
9.5. The Unperturbed Resolvent Operator
9.6. The Perturbed Operator
9.7. Compact Operators
9.8. Analytic Dependence
9.9. Projections
9.10. An Analytic Function Theorem
9.11. The Combined Results
9.12. Absolute Continuity
9.13. The Intertwining Relations
9.14. The Application
Exercises
Chapter 10. Strong Completeness
10.1. The More Difficult Problem
10.2. The Abstract Theory
10.3. The Technique
10.4. Verification for the Hamiltonian
10.5. An Extension
10.6. The Principle of Limiting Absorption
Exercises
Chapter 11. Oscillating Potentials
11.1. A Surprise
11.2. The Hamiltonian
11.3. The Estimates
11.4. A Variation
11.5. Examples
Exercises
Chapter 12. Eigenfunction Expansions
12.1. The Usefulness
12.2. The Problem
12.3. Operators on Lp
12.4. Weighted Lp-Spaces
12.5. Extended Resolvents
12.6. The Formulas
12.7. Some Consequences
12.8. Summary
Exercises
Chapter 13. Restricted Particles
13.1. A Particle Between Walls
13.2. The Energy Levels
13.3. Compact Resolvents
13.4. One Opaque Wall
13.5. Scattering on a Half-Line
13.6. The Spectral Resolution for the Free Particle on a Half-Line
Exercises
Chapter 14. Hard-Core Potentials
14.1. Local Absorption
14.2. The Modified Hamiltonian
14.5. Propagation
14.6. Proof of Theorem 14.5.1
14.9. A Regularity Theorem
14.10. A Family of Spaces
Exercises
Chapter 15. The Invariance Principle
15.1. Introduction
15.2. A Simple Result
15.3. The Estimates
15.4. An Extension
15.5. Another Form
Exercises
Chapter 16. Trace Class Operators
16.1. The Abstract Theorem
16.2. Some Consequences
16.3. Hilbert–Schmidt Operators
16.4. Verification for the Hamiltonian
Exercises
Appendix A. The Fourier Transform
Exercises A
Appendix B. Hilbert Space
Exercises B
Appendix C. Hölder’s Inequality and Banach Space
Bibliography
Index
Preface
The interaction between physics and mathematics has always played an important role in the development of both sciences. The physicist who does not have the latest mathematical knowledge available to him is at a distinct disadvantage. The mathematician who shies away from physical applications will most likely miss important insights and motivations. For these reasons it has become a practice to expose science students to a course in mathematical physics
and mathematics students to a course in applied mathematics.
Such courses usually present various mathematical techniques that are useful in science and engineering. The student is told that the mathematics is important, but he is rarely shown why it is needed. If applications are discussed, the student may find them artificially manufactured.
For several years I have been giving a course in applications of operator theory. Rather than presenting the usual mixture of theorems, I decided to pick a branch of physics and to develop the theory from the very beginning. I did it in a mathematical way without describing the experimental evidence that gave rise to the theory. I gave a few simple postulates assuming no background in physics and as little background in mathematics as possible. The students were asked to accept these few postulates and not to try to understand the reasoning that led to them. Then I gradually introduced the powerful mathematical techniques that help answer questions that are important to the physical theory. Only those mathematical methods that are needed for the physics are introduced, and they are introduced when they are required. From the very beginning it is possible to motivate the entire exposition. The student sees clearly the purpose of the method and understands the accomplishment. This book is an outgrowth of this course.
I found quantum theory to be very fruitful from a mathematical point of view. The theory gives rise to the many questions in operator theory and in the study of differential equations. I found the theory so rich that I was able to fill this entire volume analyzing only a single particle in one dimension. In fact, I was not able to cover all of the one-dimensional topics that I would have liked. It is true that most of the methods developed can be applied to systems of particles in higher dimensions, but I found that there was enough to do in the simplest case. In this way the student is introduced to the methods without being overwhelmed by details. The consideration of one situation throughout the book adds unity to the exposition.
My main thrust has been towards the understanding of the physical and mathematical principles and not towards the achieving of the strongest results. I have tried to minimize technical details wherever possible and to keep the discussion elementary. Each mathematical method is introduced as needed in the development. It is then shown how the new technique solves the problem at hand.
The book may be used at an advanced undergraduate or a beginning graduate level. The main prerequisite is advanced calculus. Elementary theory of Lebesgue integration and analytic functions of a complex variable are used unavoidably in a few sections, but the reader will have no difficulty skipping these sections if he is willing to believe certain statements. Most theorems in analysis and functional analysis are proved either on the spot or in an Appendix. There are a few theorems that I do not prove. However, the student will have no difficulty understanding their meaning, purpose, and applicability. These few theorems are standard in mathematics courses at the beginning graduate level (references are given in the Bibliography).
Theorems are designated by three numbers. The first refers to the chapter, the second to the section and the third to the order in which it appears in the section. Lemmas and propositions are similarly designated.
To my mind, the application of operator theory to quantum mechanics forms one of the most beautiful areas of knowledge. I hope this book has captured some of the beauty.
Martin Schechter
New York
TVSLB″ 0
Acknowledgements
The material presented in the book is based upon results contained in various research articles. I have tried to include all of them in the Bibliography.
I wish to thank my students Merl Altabet and Alexander Gelman for reading parts of the manuscript and making important suggestions and corrections. My daughter, Sara, helped me greatly by typing parts of the manuscript, and my wife, Deborah, made invaluable contributions to the effort.
A Message to the Reader
The purpose of this volume is to show how mathematics is used to answer questions in science. We begin by assuming that the reader has a working knowledge of advanced calculus, and we present a few simple postulates describing quantum theory. The entire book is devoted to the study of a single particle moving along a straight line. We ask questions about this particle and gradually develop mathematical techniques that give the answers. Most of these techniques can be used for more complicated systems of particles, but I did not want to get involved in too many details. There are places where I need Lebesgue integration theory and complex variables, but most of the book can be understood without them. There are a few places where I ask you to believe me (of course I give references), but there should be no difficulty in understanding the statements. I hope this book can help you see how operator theory can be used as a powerful tool in the study of quantum mechanics.
List of Symbols
The page numbers indicate where the symbols are defined or are explained.
C, 142
, 61
(J), 235
D (A), 9
EI, 13
E (I), 24, 140
Ē(I), 140
G0 (z), 177
G (z), 177
G0± (s), 192
(H), 182
(H), 139
(H), 205
(H), 182
Hs, 276
ħ, 5
iff, if and only if
, 153
Jn, 131
L², 9
Lp, 200
Lp, β, 220
M±, 106
R (A), 20
R (Z), 26
R±, 107
R± (H, H0), 152
S, 107
W±, 106
W± (H, H0), 152
δa (λ), 140
Φ, 228
χI (λ), 13
ψ, 1
ρ (A), 26
ρ(x), 113
σ (A), 26
σe (A), 48
ωI, 164
( , ), 7
Ā, 12
ā, 2
|| ||, 9
I → R, 16
N⊥, 109
|I|, 79
M± (H, H0), 152
P (a I), 13
p, 5
Q0 (z), 177
|u|s, 276
A*, 18
Z*, complex conjugate
Operator Methods
in
Quantum Mechanics
1
One-Dimensional Motion
1.1. Position
We begin by studying a single particle restricted to motion along a line. The first postulate we shall use is
Postulate 1. There is a function ψ(x, t) of position x and time t such that the probability that the particle is in an interval I at the time t is given by
Note that this postulate does not tell us how to determine the position of the particle, but only how to determine the probability that it is located in an interval. The postulate’s probabilistic nature represents a basic philosophical tenet of quantum mechanics. Later we shall see that it is seldom that we can determine the position (or any other quantity) precisely. For those who are unfamiliar with probability theory, it suffices at the moment to note that the probability of an event occurring is a number P, 0 ≤ P ≤ 1, which, in a sense, represents the chances that the event will take place. We shall have more to say about this later.
The function ψ is called the state function for the particle. Usually it is complex valued, but only in the sense that it takes on complex values for each x and t. There need not be any relationship between its real and imaginary parts (i.e., it need not be analytic in the sense of complex variables). We shall not be able to justify the appearance of the absolute value and the square power in (1.1.1); although we shall see that they are highly desirable from a mathematical point of view.
Since it is certain that the particle must be somewhere along the line, we have
at each time t.
1.2. Mathematical Expectation
Suppose w is a measurable quantity which can take on the values w1,…, wN. Assume that one can perform an indefinite number of independent experiments (i.e., the outcome of one does not affect the outcome of another) in which w is measured. Suppose the probability that w takes on the value wk is Pk, 1 ≤ k ≤ N. Since w must take on one of the given values, we have
The quantity
is called the mathematical expectation or average value of w. The reason for this terminology is the following theorem from the theory of probability (cf. Feller, 1950).
Theorem 1.2.1. Suppose a sequence of identical experiments is performed and the values S1, S2, . . ., Sn, . . ., are observed (the numbers Sn are among the values w1, . . ., wN). Then the average value
converges to "in the sense of probability."
In order for this theorem to make sense, we must know what it means to converge in the sense of probability.
By this we mean that for each ε > 0 the probability that
tends to 0 as n → ∞. Life would be a lot simpler if are small.
If w can take on any value in some interval, we must assign to each subinterval I the probability PI that the value of w lies in I. To compute the mathematical expectation of w, assume first that it is restricted to a bounded interval [a, b]. We divide this interval up into small subintervals Ik and form the sum
where xk is an arbitrary point of Ik. If these sums converge to a limit as the maximum length of the intervals Ik tends to 0 independently of the manner in which the intervals Ik were chosen and independently of the choice of the points xk ∈ Ik the mathematical expectation of w. If w is not restricted to a bounded interval, we compute first the limit as above for a bounded interval [a, b
of w.
To illustrate this concept, consider the probability (1.1.1) that a particle is in an interval I. Let I be a bounded interval, and subdivide it into smaller intervals Ik. If xk is an arbitrary point in Ik, (1.2.5) becomes
The following is true:
Lemma 1.2.1. If ψ(x, t) is continuous with respect to x in I, then (1.2.6) converges to
as the maximum length of the intervals Ik tends to 0 independently of the choice of the Ik and xk.
PROOF. We have
Let ε > 0 be given, and take the length of each Ik < ε. Then |x–xk |< ε in Ik. Thus the right-hand side of (1.2.8) is less than
The definition and Lemma 1.2.1 lead immediately to
Theorem 1.2.2. If ψ(x, t) is continuous with respect to x and
then the mathematical expectation of position is given by
Now we give a proof of Theorem 1.2.1 for the case of the position of a particle. Suppose the positions of n identical particles are measured at a time t and that they all have the same state function. Suppose the observed values are x1, . . ., xn. If x0 and a > 0 are given, then the probability that |x0 – Σxk| > a is
This is less than
Set
and
where the asterisk denotes complex conjugation. Since
(1.2.11) is equal to
is bounded by
By , while the second term tends to 0 as n → ∞.
Theorem 1.2.3. If f(x) is a continuous function satisfying
then the mathematical expectation of f(x) is given by
The proof of Theorem 1.2.3 is simple. In fact, let I be a bounded interval, and let I1, . . ., IN be a partition of I into smaller intervals with maximum length δ. If xk is an arbitrary point in Ik, we have
Since f(x) is uniformly continuous in I, we can make |f(x) – f(xk)| < ε in Ik by taking δ sufficiently small. For such a δ the left-hand side of (1.2.14) is less than
Once we have established this, we merely note that
1.3. Momentum
In classical physics the momentum of a particle is defined as
The second postulate we shall make concerns momentum. We state it as follows:
Postulate 2. The probability that the momentum p of the particle is contained in the interval I is given by
where ħ is the Fourier transform of ψ with respect to x defined by
(We apologize to the mathematicians for using k as a variable.) As in the case of position, the average value of p turns out to be
As in Section 1.2, we have
Theorem 1.3.1. If g(p) is continuous and satisfies
then
The proof of Theorem 1.3.1 is the same as that of Theorem 1.2.3.
In order to deal with momentum, we shall need to know certain properties of the Fourier transform. We state them here without hypotheses. Precise statements and proofs will be given in Appendix A.
a.The inverse Fourier transform
b.Parseval’s identity
(The asterisk denotes the complex conjugate.)
denotes the inverse Fourier transform.)
without using the Fourier transform. For by (1.3.2)
Thus
where
This is called the momentum operator. Note that (1.3.7) is free of Fourier transforms, but the penalty paid is the introduction of the partial differential operator L.
Repeated applications of (e) give
Consequently, we have by (1.3.4)
where we have used the notation
1.4. Energy
In classical physics the kinetic energy T of the particle is given by
By (1.3.10) the expectation of T is
The potential energy is given by a real-valued function of position V(x). The total energy is given by
If V(x) is continuous and satisfies
then Theorem 1.2.3 gives as the expectation value of the potential energy
How can we compute the average of the total energy? It turns out to be a simple matter if we use
Theorem 1.4.1. The mathematical expectation of a sum is equal to the sum of the mathematical expectations.
Thus, if we add (1.4.2) and (1.4.5), we get
where
is the energy operator or Hamiltonian.
It should be noted that Theorem 1.4.1 holds whether or not the quantities are independent. We shall give the proof only for the case of discrete variables.
Let u be a measurable quantity that can only take on the values u1, . . ., uM with probabilities P1, . . ., PM and let υ be a measurable quantity that can take on only the values υ1, . . ., υN with probabilities Q1, . . ., QN. Let Rij be the probability that u = ui and that υ = υj. (If the quantities are independent, then Rij = PiQj. Otherwise, this need not be so.) Thus
Now the mathematical expectation of u + υ is
This proves the theorem for the discrete case.
Although we have proved
(1.4.5) only for continuous functions V(x), there are many potentials of physical interest which possess discontinuities or even singularities. For such functions we shall take (1.4.5) as the definition of the expectation value.
1.5. Observables
Any quantity that can be measured is called an observable. We have discussed three, namely, position, momentum, and energy. In each of these cases, we have noticed that there corresponds an operator in the sense that if a denotes the variable and ā is its average value, then there is an operator A such that
We can make a table:
In each of the cases mentioned the observable took on real values only. In such cases the average value must be real as well. This requires that (Aψ, ψ) be real for any state function ψ. This leads to the question, what operators A have the property that (Aψ, ψ) is real for every state function ψ? Fortunately the answer is simple. An operator A is called Hermitian if
holds for all ψ, φ. The answer to our question is given by
Lemma 1.5.1. An operator A is Hermitian if and only if (Aψ, ψ) is real for all ψ.
Before we give the proof of Lemma 1.5.1, we had better clarify certain concepts. An operator . The set of elements on which it acts is called its domain. An operator A is called linear if (1) αx + βy is in its domain D(A) whenever x, y are in its domain and α, β are scalars, and (2) A(αx + βy) = αAx + βAy. We shall take our scalars to be complex, and