Forcible Entry And The German Invasion Of Norway, 1940
3/5
()
About this ebook
Major Michael W. Richardson
See Book Description
Related to Forcible Entry And The German Invasion Of Norway, 1940
Related ebooks
Joint Operations Case Study. Weserübung Nord Germany's Invasion Of Norway, 1940 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5German Special Operations In The 1944 Ardennes Offensive Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Folly of Generals: How Eisenhower's Broad Front Strategy Lengthened World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlitzkrieg: The Invasion of Poland to the Fall of France Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBattle Of Savo Island - Lessons Learned And Future Implications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe First World War (2): The Western Front 1914–1916 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crossing the Eastern Front: A Novel Based on the True Story of a Teenage SS Volunteer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFire Support in the Reduction of an Encircled Force - a Forgotten Mission Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistory of the German Campaign in Russia (1940-1942): Strategy & Operational Execution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmateur Gunners: The Great War Adventures, Letters and Observations of Alexander Douglas Thorburn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Armies Grow: The Expansion of Military Forces in the Age of Total War 1789–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBritish Boer War And The French Algerian Conflict: Counterinsurgency For Today Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperational Encirclements: Can The United States Military Decisively Follow Through? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTynedale at War, 1939–1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5German Methods Of Warfare In The Libyan Desert [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTurning the Tide: The Australian Army in New Guinea 1942-43 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThrough the Wheat Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Urban Operations, Untrained On Terrain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCoalition Warfare: An Uneasy Accord Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsField Marshal Earl Haig Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Trafalgar And Jutland: A Study In The Principles Of War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRommel’s Desert Campaigns, February 1941-September 1942: A Study In Operational Level Weakness [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDevelopment Of Tactics - World War I [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPortugal's Bush War in Mozambique Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPioneers of Irregular Warfare: Secrets of the Military Intelligence Research Department of the Second World War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar in the West, The Battle of France, May-June, 1940 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperational Principles: The Operational Art Of Erwin Rommel And Bernard Montgomery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStirling Work: The Story of the SAS During WWII Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
European History For You
Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dry: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quite Nice and Fairly Accurate Good Omens Script Book: The Script Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Six Wives of Henry VIII Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Oscar Wilde: The Unrepentant Years Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mein Kampf: English Translation of Mein Kamphf - Mein Kampt - Mein Kamphf Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England: A Handbook for Visitors to the Fourteenth Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jane Austen: The Complete Novels Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Galileo's Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith and Love Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of English Magic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKilling England: The Brutal Struggle for American Independence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anglo-Saxons: A History of the Beginnings of England: 400 – 1066 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Finding Freedom: Harry and Meghan and the Making of a Modern Royal Family Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Anarchy: The East India Company, Corporate Violence, and the Pillage of an Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Psychedelic Gospels: The Secret History of Hallucinogens in Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Putin's People: How the KGB Took Back Russia and Then Took On the West Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Celtic Mythology: A Concise Guide to the Gods, Sagas and Beliefs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Witch: A History of Fear, from Ancient Times to the Present Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Celtic Charted Designs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Violent Abuse of Women: In 17th and 18th Century Britain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Short History of the World: The Story of Mankind From Prehistory to the Modern Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Forcible Entry And The German Invasion Of Norway, 1940
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Forcible Entry And The German Invasion Of Norway, 1940 - Major Michael W. Richardson
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 2001 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2014, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
FORCIBLE ENTRY AND THE GERMAN INVASION OF NORWAY, 1940,
by
MAJ Michael W. Richardson
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
ABSTRACT 5
CHAPTER 1 — INTRODUCTION 6
CHAPTER 2 — BACKGROUND OF THE INVASION OF NORWAY 11
CHAPTER 3 — SETTING THE CONDITIONS: CONTROL OF THE SEA AND AIR 21
CHAPTER 4 — SETTING THE CONDITIONS: ACHIEVE SURPRISE AND ISOLATE THE LODGMENT 33
CHAPTER 5 — SETTING THE CONDITIONS: INTEGRATE PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS/ CIVIL AFFAIRS AND MANAGE IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT 39
CHAPTER 6 — SETTING THE CONDITIONS: NEUTRALIZE ENEMY FORCES 44
CHAPTER 7 — CONCLUSION 53
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 66
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 67
Unpublished Materials 67
Unit Histories 67
Manuscripts 67
Foreign Military Studies 68
Published Materials 68
Official Records 68
Books 69
Periodicals and Articles 71
Field Manuals and Joint Publications 71
ABSTRACT
The air-sea-land forcible entry of Norway in 1940 utilized German operational innovation and boldness to secure victory. The Germans clearly met, and understood, the conditions that were necessary to achieve victory. The central research question of this thesis is: What lessons concerning setting the conditions for present day forcible entry operations can be gleaned from the successful German invasion of Norway in 1940? Forcible entry is the introduction of an aggregation of military personnel, weapons systems, vehicles, and necessary support, or a combination thereof, embarked for the purpose of gaining access through land, air, or amphibious operations into an objective area against resistance. This aggregation of military force attempts to set conditions that cripple the enemy’s ability to react decisively to, or interfere with, the forcible entry operation. The German emphasis on surprise and speed, an effective psychological campaign, and combined operations under a unified command in the invasion of Norway rendered the Norwegian and Allied intervention forces (including the Royal Navy which dominated the seas in the area) incapable of seriously interfering with the German forcible entry.
CHAPTER 1 — INTRODUCTION
In the spring of 1940 the German military conducted a successful combined air and amphibious invasion of Norway, securing that country in less than two months. They did so in spite of the fact that Great Britain’s navy (the world’s foremost naval power) was based within one day’s steaming of the area and the British fleet outnumbered and outclassed Germany’s navy. The air-sea-land joint operation was the first of its kind in modern war, and the results of the campaign had far-reaching effects on the conduct of World War II by Britain, France, and Germany.
To the Allies, the most immediate political effect of the Scandinavian activity was the fall of both the French and British governments. British Prime Minister Chamberlain, believing that he did not have the confidence of the government to prosecute the war due to his handling of the early portion of the campaign in Norway, resigned on 10 May 1940, the same day the Germans invaded the Low Countries. Winston Churchill succeeded him as Prime Minister{1} and ably guided Britain’s war effort through the World War. The French Chamber of Deputies voted Premier Daladier out of office before the campaign even began, due to his failure to prosecute aggressively the war with Germany. His government’s inactivity concerning Scandinavia during the Russo-Finish war contributed to his fall. The new Premier, Paul Reynaud, was considered a man of action by the Chamber of Deputies and an opponent of Daladier, but was forced to retain the former Premier as the Minister of War for political reasons. The enmity engendered by this situation did not bode well for the future defense of France.
The British and their allies also measured the cost of the campaign in men and equipment. Losses in men stood at 1869 British, about 530 French and Polish, 1335 Norwegians (not counting prisoners), and about 2500 of all nationalities lost at sea.{2} Aircraft losses stood at 112 machines (some of these were lost when German surface ships sank the British carrier Glorious late in the campaign.){3} In addition to the Glorious, the British lost two cruisers, nine destroyers, six submarines, and three transports.{4} The losses incurred in the destroyer force exacerbated the shortage of merchant escorts already being felt in the Atlantic convoy battles. The loss of the almost irreplaceable carrier (Britain went to war with only four modern fleet carriers and three obsolete models) also weakened the ability of the British to project naval power in the Atlantic or Mediterranean. The heavy equipment and supplies abandoned by the British ground forces during the evacuation of the country would have been welcomed in the Mediterranean Theater or in home defense of the British Isles following the fall of France.
Germany gained three advantages with the victory in Norway. First, Germany secured her northern flank by rendering a British occupation of Norway impossible. Second, Germany secured the route of the Swedish iron ore so important to the German war economy, and third, Norway offered naval and air bases from which to strike at Britain. The psychological blow to Allied morale of a successful invasion in the face of the Royal Navy would also be significant. Germany accomplished these gains with slight losses to their air and ground forces. During the campaign the Germans lost 5,660 men, 120 combat aircraft, and eighty air transports.{5} These ground and air losses had little effect on the further course of the war, as the Germans were still able to concentrate the ground and air forces needed to defeat France even as the Norwegian campaign continued. The most significant losses were among their naval surface fleet. The loss of three cruisers, ten destroyers, and eleven transports, along with severe damage to two battle cruisers, a pocket battleship, and two cruisers eliminated the navy as a factor in future German strategic planning.
How did the German military manage to project successfully military power into Norway, given its naval inferiority and the difficulties of applying combat power in a forcible entry? Although the state of military technology has advanced since World War Two, lessons learned by the Germans concerning setting the conditions for a forcible entry are still valid. As today’s United States military must be able to conduct forcible entry operations in order to execute the National Military Strategy, these lessons have applicability to present-day missions. In order to understand these lessons, an understanding of the rudiments of forcible entry operations, as framed by today’s requirements and doctrine, is necessary.
The US National Military Strategy, derived from the National Security Strategy, has shifted the focus of the US military from the Cold War reliance on forward-deployed forces to a flexible strategy based on responding to potential regional crisis by rapidly projecting combat power from the continental United States. In order for this power projection paradigm to be credible as a deterrent and as a viable warfighting option for policy enforcement, our forces must be able to deploy and may have to fight to gain access into the selected geographical area.{6} During the Cold War, rapid deployment was valued as a reinforcement of forward forces,