The Little Book of Anger
()
About this ebook
There are thirty chapters in all, each focussing on an aspect of modern life that can cause irritation – from chewing gum to the assault on the English language. The book explores some of the major irritants of life in way that will chime with readers, even if they don’t agree. As one reviewer put it, the pleasure of the book is in agreeing with most of it – and getting cross with the rest.
This book is not intended as a literary version of Grumpy Old Men and Grumpy Old Women, but if you liked those, you’ll love this!
Martin Wilson
Martin Wilson QC was, for many years, in practice at the Bar. He specialised in criminal law, defending and prosecuting in cases of murder, fraud, corruption and other serious crimes, both in England and Hong Kong. He always has enjoyed writing for pleasure but, for the time being at least, prefers to avoid the subject of the Law. He is the author of A Little Book of Anger (Matador)
Read more from Martin Wilson
Unbidden Guests Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Trial of Lester Chan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Little Book of Anger
Related ebooks
Why Are We Always Indoors?: ( . . . Unless We're Off to Barnard Castle) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDon't Look at the Camera: Making television at Britain's smallest ITV station Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMemoirs of a 'Death Cult' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInterview: The Man Who Loves His Computer, Invented the Electric Highway and Is Running for President Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLoathe Thy Neighbour Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBreaking News: How to Tell What's Real From What's Rubbish Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWords, A Simple Approach to Reason Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUpside In: An Interactive Introspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMANIFESTATION (How Thoughts Become Things!) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProgress, What Progress? Britain on the Skids Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTEOTWAWKI: The End Of The World As We Know It Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMore Senior Moments (The Ones We Forgot) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Life in Questions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe A Z of Being British Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIts All Your Fault: How To Make It As A Hollywood Assistant Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Telling Tales: The Confessions of a Handy Man Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Confidence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grumpy Old Men: A Manual for the British Malcontent Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHouse, M.D.: The Official Guide to the Hit Medical Drama Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Rest Is Silence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Big One Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOne Human Minute Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When Is It A Good Day To Die Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaking Television: My Way Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTribute To George Carlin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Path to Rome Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Secrets of Creation: The Mystery of the Prime Numbers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClocks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5About Time 7: The Unauthorized Guide to Doctor Who (Series 1 & 2) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Microcosmographia Academica: Being a Guide for the Young Academic Politician. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Humor & Satire For You
The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Swamp Story: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Man Called Ove: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5101 Fun Personality Quizzes: Who Are You . . . Really?! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mindful As F*ck: 100 Simple Exercises to Let That Sh*t Go! Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Maybe You Should Talk to Someone: the heartfelt, funny memoir by a New York Times bestselling therapist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Don't Panic: Douglas Adams & The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Love and Other Words Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best F*cking Activity Book Ever: Irreverent (and Slightly Vulgar) Activities for Adults Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Soulmate Equation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 2,548 Wittiest Things Anybody Ever Said Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Yes Please Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anxious People: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Big Swiss: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the Guys Who Killed the Guy Who Killed Lincoln: A Nutty Story About Edwin Booth and Boston Corbett Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I Will Judge You by Your Bookshelf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everything I Know About Love: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5And Every Morning the Way Home Gets Longer and Longer: A Novella Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Farrell Covington and the Limits of Style: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Can't Make This Up: Life Lessons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Go the F**k to Sleep Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tidy the F*ck Up: The American Art of Organizing Your Sh*t Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Favorite Half-Night Stand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Be Alone: If You Want To, and Even If You Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best Joke Book (Period): Hundreds of the Funniest, Silliest, Most Ridiculous Jokes Ever Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nothing to See Here: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Little Book of Anger
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Little Book of Anger - Martin Wilson
Me.
TELEVISION JOURNALISTS
What is it about them that make them so irritating? Well, I suppose the most obvious thing is their hand-waving. They do not seem capable of saying anything without exaggerated gesticulation. Just watch the next time you turn on the news and see a reporter explaining some perfectly simple concept with the aid of sweeping gestures and bouncing hands. And why do they say absolutely
as soon as they have been introduced and have taken over the item? Absolutely what? If the implication is supposed to be that the journalist’s enthusiasm is boundless, does that mean that a lesser colleague should start by saying Partially
? It is a particularly meaningless word to use when it normally follows an anodyne question from the anchor, such as Jim, you are outside Scotland Yard now?
Yes, absolutely.
But, given that the reporter is standing outside Scotland Yard, near that faintly ridiculous but much photographed revolving sign, the next question is: why are you standing there? The topic under discussion may concern a wide range of police-related topics but it is difficult (no, let’s be frank, it’s impossible) to see how the reporter’s being outside the building is going to enlighten the viewer or facilitate comprehension. The poor journalist (and here a touch of sympathy creeps in, reluctantly) has driven from a comfortable studio or even his or her home, taking with him a cameraman and a sound recordist, possibly in dreadful weather, possibly through London’s slow traffic so that he can stand outside the building and tell his tale. Assuming that there are archive photographs of most public buildings and assuming further (and this is not an immediately obvious assumption to make) that there is some dramatic enhancement in having the building as the background, I fail to see why he has to traipse over to SW1. It cannot, surely, be that they expect something momentous or even moderately newsworthy to happen: a deputy assistant commissioner throwing himself from the top of the building, for instance, or a cabinet minister being bundled into the back of a police car with an officer’s hand on the top of his head in the manner of a crime drama. No, it is, plainly, because some dunderhead long ago decided that to be outside the building would, in some undefined way, add verisimilitude to the story and, with a complete lack of independent thought, it caught on and now this is how it is always done. That there is no other explanation is illustrated by the following. There are often noteworthy criminal trials that catch the public’s attention and take place outside London. The jury returns its verdict at, say, 3.00 pm and, if there has been a conviction, the judge adjourns the case for sentence until, say, the following day or until pre-sentence or psychiatric reports are available. So the defendant is driven off to prison and the jury, the judge, the barristers and solicitors, the police officers, the families of the victim and of the prisoner, in fact, everyone, goes home. The cleaners come in and start work. It is now 7.00 pm and, live on the early evening news, a television journalist is outside the Crown Court, in the pouring rain, in the dark, with a piece on the trial and the verdict. Is it believed that the item will be given more impact if it comes from outside the court? Presumably so, and most probably that is because the journalist thinks (no, that is too strong an assumption because it is hard to divine what process of logic would arrive at this conclusion; it is more likely that he feels) that there is more credibility in a report that comes from outside the arena than from inside a studio.
That is not, of course, limited to court reporting; we have all seen zoom-in pictures of the exterior of hospitals, for instance, where an outbreak of MRSA or an unfortunate mix-up of blood samples has occurred. That is the subject of the report and we are supposed to be able to absorb it better if we are shown the sign for the outpatients’ department in close-up.
Misuse of English is another serious fault of many television journalists, but it is not limited to them and is so widespread that it merits a section of its own. Nevertheless, I am conscious that some of the crassness of their reports may not be wholly, or at all, their fault. It may well be down to production and post-production.
PRODUCTION AND POST-PRODUCTION
Presumably the same pseudo-thought process is employed when we are shown wholly uninformative photographs or video footage as the background to a report. Some slightly post-adolescent studio director must once have decided that, when a news item relating to finance was reported, we should be shown pictures of bank notes and pound coins and that, if it concerned mortgage interest rates, it should be of a row of houses, some with ‘For Sale’ boards up. When there was controversy over the sale of Cadbury to an American conglomerate, we were helped to understand the social and fiscal complexities by being shown pictures of bars of chocolate. If the topic is children, we see feet in a school playground. We, of course, never see the children’s faces because of some strained misunderstanding of the law: for Heaven’s sake, we can see children if we look out of the window, that doesn’t make us paedophiles or invaders of their privacy; but we do see their feet, lots of them, just as we are shown footage of lots of people (for some reason, usually crossing what looks like Waterloo Bridge) when the item concerns, in some way, the population in general or sections of the population. I once saw the same shot used when the topic was obesity. These pictures add nothing to the story other than to make me shout at my wife, poor darling, So, that’s what money looks like!
or Haven’t those children got a lot of feet!
¹
There must be a pecking order in broadcasting. You start as a radio producer with the BBC and think it a good idea to have supposedly apt music to accompany serious news commentary. Thus, to go with an, admittedly, rather dull piece on secondary school class sizes, you insert as an introduction, a few bars from ‘I Don’t Need No Education’ and, rather than getting demoted for that inanity, you either do it again or find the idea taken up (for, yes, I have heard it done three times) and find yourself promoted to a television production manager where you believe that you are the first person to conceive of the idea of having someone interviewed at the wheel of his car – and not just at the wheel, but actually driving. This is for no discernible purpose – the interviewee is not talking about driving or anything even marginally connected with road transport – but he turns towards the cameraman who is, presumably, squeezed uncomfortably with his equipment in the front passenger seat and puts everyone’s life at risk as he gives his views on welfare reform or the burgeoning of Starbucks. Then, having established himself as a someone who can reuse hackneyed situations, the young director goes on to post-production