Balancing Act: Australia Between Recession and Renewal; Quarterly Essay 61
4/5
()
About this ebook
Megalogenis outlines the challenge for Malcolm Turnbull and his government. Our tax system is unfair and we have failed to invest in infrastructure and education. Both sides of politics are clinging defensively to an old model because it tells them a reassuring story of Australian success. But that model has been exhausted by capitalism’s extended crisis and the end of the mining boom. Trusting to the market has left us with gridlocked cities, growing inequality and a corporate sector that feels no obligation to pay tax. It is time to redraw the line between market and state.
Balancing Act is a passionate look at the politics of change and renewal, and a bold call for active government. It took World War II to provide the energy and focus for the reconstruction that laid the foundation for modern Australia. Will it take another crisis to prompt a new reconstruction?
“Australia is in transition. Saying it is easy. The panic kicks in when we are compelled to describe what the future might look like. There is no complacent middle to aim at. We will either catch the next wave of prosperity, or finally succumb to the Great Recession.” —George Megalogenis, Balancing Act
This issue also contains correspondence discussing Quarterly Essay 60, Political Amnesia, from Bernie Fraser, Amanda Walsh, Tarah Barzanji, Allan Behm, Jennifer Rayner, Anne Tiernan, Graham Evans, John Quiggin, Scott Ludlam, Michael Keating, Stephen Sedgwick, and Laura Tingle
George Megalogenis
George Megalogenis has written for The Australian, The Monthly and the Nine papers. His book The Australian Moment won the 2013 Prime Minister’s Literary Award for Non-fiction and the 2012 Walkley Award for Non-fiction, and formed the basis for the ABC documentary series Making Australia Great. His other books include Australia’s Second Chance, The Football Solution, Faultlines, The Longest Decade and two previous Quarterly Essays, Trivial Pursuit and Balancing Act.
Read more from George Megalogenis
The Longest Decade Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related to Balancing Act
Titles in the series (94)
Quarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea: Australia, the Refugees and the Politics of Fear Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 1 In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 10 Bad Company: The Cult of the CEO Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 37 What's Right?: The Future of Conservatism in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSending Them Home: Refugees and the New Politics of Indifference; Quarterly Essay 13 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quarterly Essay 15 Latham's World: The New Politics of the Outsiders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 8 Groundswell: The Rise of the Greens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 20 A Time for War: Australia as a Military Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 2 Appeasing Jakarta: Australia's Complicity in the East Timor Tragedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 23 The History Question: Who Owns The Past? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 18 Worried Well: The Depression Epidemic and the Medicalisation of Our Sorrows Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 7 Paradise Betrayed: West Papua's Struggle for Independence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond Belief: What Future for Labor?; Quarterly Essay 6 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 31 Now or Never: A Sustainable Future for Australia? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 24 No Fixed Address: Nomads and the Fate of the Planet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 3 The Opportunist: John Howard and the Triumph of Reaction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 12 Made in England: Australia's British Inheritance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 30 Last Drinks: The Impact of the Northern Territory Intervention Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Quarterly Essay 14 Mission Impossible: The Sheikhs, the U.S. and the Future of Iraq Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 16 Breach of Trust: Truth, Morality and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings"Kangaroo Court": Family Law Court in Australia; Quarterly Essay 17 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 33 Quarry Vision: Coal, Climate Change and the End of the Resources Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhitefella Jump Up: The Shortest Way to Nationhood; Quarterly Essay 11 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 19 Relaxed and Comfortable: The Liberal Party's Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 25 Bipolar Nation: How to Win the 2007 Election Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 4 Rabbit Syndrome: Australia and America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 9 Beautiful Lies: Population and Environment in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 32 American Revolution: The Fall of Wall Street and the Rise of Barack Obama Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 28 Exit Right: The Unravelling of John Howard Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 29 Love and Money: The Family and the Free Market Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Trivial Pursuit: Leadership and the End of the Reform Era; Quarterly Essay 40 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 60 Political Amnesia: How We Forgot How To Govern Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 36 Australian Story: Kevin Rudd and the Lucky Country Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 82 Exit Strategy: Politics After the Pandemic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 37 What's Right?: The Future of Conservatism in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDog Days: Australia After the Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 63 Enemy Within: American Politics in the Time of Trump Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond Belief: What Future for Labor?; Quarterly Essay 6 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 35 Radical Hope: Education and Equality for Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 49 Not Dead Yet: Labor's Post-Left Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 21 What's Left?: The Death of Social Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 57 Dear Life: On Caring for the Elderly Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 51 The Prince: Faith, Abuse and George Pell Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quarterly Essay 59 Faction Man: Bill Shorten's Path to Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 54 Dragon's Tail: The Lucky Country After the China Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 3 The Opportunist: John Howard and the Triumph of Reaction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 33 Quarry Vision: Coal, Climate Change and the End of the Resources Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUncivil Wars: How Contempt Is Corroding Democracy; Quarterly Essay 87 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 27 Reaction Time: Climate Change and the Nuclear Option Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFaction Man: Bill Shorten's Pursuit of Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 42 Fair Share: Country and City in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 70 Dead Right: How Neoliberalism Ate Itself and What Comes Next Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea: Australia, the Refugees and the Politics of Fear Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 45 Us and Them: On the Importance of Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Highway to Hell: Climate Change and Australia's Future; Quarterly Essay 94 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 46 Great Expectations: Government, Entitlement and an Angry Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sending Them Home: Refugees and the New Politics of Indifference; Quarterly Essay 13 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quarterly Essay 2 Appeasing Jakarta: Australia's Complicity in the East Timor Tragedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 65 The White Queen: One Nation and the Politics of Race Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lucky Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
World Politics For You
The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hundred Years' War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 2]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lemon Tree: An Arab, a Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of The 1619 Project: by Nikole Hannah-Jones - A Comprehensive Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (Updated Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Israel: A Concise History of a Nation Reborn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ten Myths About Israel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Light in Gaza: Writings Born of Fire Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From Beirut to Jerusalem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Enemies and Neighbors: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917-2017 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Antisemitism: Part One of The Origins of Totalitarianism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A World Without Jews Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-1962 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Palestine: A Socialist Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Promised Land: the triumph and tragedy of Israel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Palestine-Israeli Conflict: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComic Wars: Marvel's Battle For Survival Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Six Day War: The Breaking of the Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Balancing Act
4 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Balancing Act - George Megalogenis
Quarterly Essay
Quarterly Essay is published four times a year by Black Inc., an imprint of Schwartz Publishing Pty Ltd. Publisher: Morry Schwartz.
ISBN 978-1-925203-83-7 ISSN 1832-0953
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior consent of the publishers.
Essay & correspondence © retained by the authors.
Subscriptions – 1 year print & digital (4 issues): $79.95 within Australia incl. GST. Outside Australia $119.95. 2 years print & digital (8 issues): $129.95 within Australia incl. GST. 1 year digital only: $39.95.
Payment may be made by Mastercard or Visa, or by cheque made out to Schwartz Publishing. Payment includes postage and handling.
To subscribe, fill out and post the subscription card or form inside this issue, or subscribe online:
www.quarterlyessay.com
subscribe@blackincbooks.com
Phone: 61 3 9486 0288
Correspondence should be addressed to:
The Editor, Quarterly Essay
Level 1, 221 Drummond Street
Carlton VIC 3053 Australia
Phone: 61 3 9486 0288 / Fax: 61 3 9011 6106
Email: quarterlyessay@blackincbooks.com
Editor: Chris Feik. Management: Caitlin Yates.
Publicity: Anna Lensky. Design: Guy Mirabella. Assistant Editor: Kirstie Innes-Will. Production Coordinator: Siân Scott-Clash. Typesetting: Tristan Main.
BALANCING ACT
Australia Between Recession and Renewal
George Megalogenis
CORRESPONDENCE
Bernie Fraser, Amanda Walsh, Tarah Barzanji, Allan Behm, Jennifer Rayner, Anne Tiernan, Graham Evans, John Quiggin, Scott Ludlam, Michael Keating and Stephen Sedgwick, Laura Tingle
Contributors
Australia is in transition. Saying it is easy. The panic kicks in when we are compelled to describe what the future might look like. There is no complacent middle to aim at. We will either catch the next wave of prosperity, or finally succumb to the Great Recession.
Each force that is pulling apart our present reads like a turgid unit in a university degree. The technological revolution. Population ageing. The Asian century. Global warming. The mining boom, and bust. The crisis in capitalism. What are the challenges and opportunities? Discuss.
Some of our leaders have revelled in the detail. Kevin Rudd wanted to be across every subject, although he couldn’t stick to any one topic long enough for the public to catch up. The annoying imprecision of his method sent his successors to the other extreme of simplicity. It will be impossible for coming generations to separate the banalities of Julia Gillard from those of Tony Abbott. Moving forward
and Stop the boats
will be slogans shorn of their contexts, and our children will wonder if our prime ministers were really that shallow. No, they were the most talented politicians of their era, their old supporters will reply. It was just that governing was impossible in the digital age.
Malcolm Turnbull brings us back to where we started with Kevin07 – this is a leader who sounds unafraid of the future. But we are no closer to understanding where the world is heading, or our place in it. We do know we want to remain affluent and egalitarian. Turnbull had that platitude worked out before he took over. He told us on the day he sought the Liberal leadership last September that he wants Australia to remain a high-wage, generous social-welfare net, first-world society.
But in making that pledge, he acknowledged the root of our anxiety: the fear that we will be overrun by globalisation once China no longer has any need for our coal and iron ore.
The national mood has been defensive for so many years now that it is hard to recall the last time we were genuinely free of hang-ups and could look to the future with optimism. We greeted the new millennium as the cheery hosts of the Sydney Olympics, but virtually every message we have sent to the world since then has betrayed our parochialism. The Tampa episode of 2001 marked the birth of a long, complex phase of Australian insularity. Its first peak had nothing to do with asylum seekers. It came a few years after the Tampa, when the boats had stopped and the mining boom was underway. John Howard gave back every windfall dollar in the budget so that we could treat ourselves. That was the more revealing expression of our self-absorption, unprompted by a global crisis. We simply didn’t care enough about the future to reinvest some of that money on behalf of our children. But then Howard double-crossed voters with his WorkChoices program, and the true source of our anger was confirmed – it was globalisation itself. With WorkChoices, Howard reminded Australians that their government no longer felt obliged to defend them against the open economy. Rudd’s election win in 2007 briefly broke the spell. We applauded his handling of the global financial crisis, but once the danger had passed he lost his governing nerve, and a new cycle of narcissism commenced. The boats returned in 2009, reviving the old Australian dread of foreign invasion. Abbott ultimately turned the asylum seekers back again with the help of Labor’s more punitive policies, but still we were miserable, with him in particular and the world in general.
The supposed strengths of the Australian character – our openness, our love of technology, our pluck – have been notably absent in our attitude to the future. Put bluntly, we don’t have a plan. We know we need one, written jointly across government, business, trade unions and civil society. But we keep finding excuses to return to the trenches of our prejudice. Even there, within the sanctuary of the tribe, there is little cohesion. The Liberal Party is split along fault-lines of ideology and personality. Labor still lacks purpose. The trade unions divide between the ineffective and the corrupt. Within my own profession, the media, too many commentators have assigned themselves to covering their rivals. News Corp, for instance, deploys more resources to attacking the ABC than analysing the economy. Only business appears to have unity of purpose in its relentless pursuit of concessions from government.
The most consistent message sent by voters to the main parties over the past decade and a half has been the demand for security. Both sides have taken this to mean border protection and bribes at the ballot box; one fist clenched against the rest of the world, while the other hand offers cash to the most aggrieved. Yet each leader that tried this was bewildered when voters could not be appeased. The truth is that the demand for security is more sophisticated than politics has allowed. We want our leaders to think for the long term; to prepare us for life beyond the mining boom. Both sides have found this in their research since the earliest days of the boom, but both have been unable to see past the next Newspoll. Something deeper is happening here than the predictable incompetence of politics. The system knows what voters are really asking for: a return to some form of government intervention in the economy. Yet this is resisted because of a misguided faith in the open economic model. The only leader who seriously tried to find a way out of the impasse was Rudd, but he lost focus after the global financial crisis. Now a Liberal prime minister is being asked by the public to redraw the line between the market and the state.
The economy was the primary reason Turnbull gave for challenging Abbott. It is clear enough that the government is not successful in providing the economic leadership that we need,
he declared.
It is not the fault of individual ministers. Ultimately the prime minister has not been capable of providing the economic leadership our nation needs; he has not been capable of providing the economic confidence that business needs … The big economic changes that we’re living through here and around the world offer enormous challenges and enormous opportunities and we need a different style of leadership. We need a style of leadership that … explains the challenges and how to seize the opportunities. A style of leadership that respects the people’s intelligence … We need advocacy, not slogans.
He wasn’t pitching to undecided colleagues, because the numbers to topple Abbott were already locked in. This assessment was delivered for the benefit of the public, and six months after the coup it remains the most remarkable admission that a Coalition government has made while in office.
No previous regime removed its leader on grounds of economic incompetence, although others probably should have. Before Abbott, the conservatives had replaced three sitting prime ministers – Billy Hughes in 1923, Robert Menzies in 1941 and John Gorton in 1971. In each case, the basic complaint was leadership style: arrogance, in short.
With Abbott, the personal and the polling were secondary to economic management. His erratic, uninspiring leadership demoralised business and consumers to an extent that no prime minister had since Gough Whitlam. Confidence in the future is the essential ingredient of economic growth. For a nation in transition, a loss of confidence can create a self-fulfilling prophecy of missed opportunities. Businesses become risk-averse. Consumers close their wallets. Employers respond to that weaker demand by cutting costs. Workers react to the squeeze on their wages by reducing spending. And so on, until growth stalls.
It was on Abbott’s watch that we finally lost our global economic bragging right. The verdict was confirmed on the very day he was ousted, 14 September 2015, when the International Monetary Fund released its annual review of the Australian economy. Australia has enjoyed exceptionally strong income growth for the past two decades,
the IMF concluded. But the waning resource investment boom and sharp fall in the terms of trade have brought this to a halt. A cyclical recovery is likely in the near term, but over the medium term, income growth is likely to slow to a rate in line with other advanced economies.
Identifying when Australia’s long run of economic over-achievement ended is relatively easy. It was June 2014, when our unemployment rate crossed 6 per cent for the first time in eleven years. Timing matters here. This was just one month after the release of the Abbott government’s pugnacious first budget. Unemployment had been creeping