Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Freedom in the Air: A Czech Flyer and his Aircrew Dog
Freedom in the Air: A Czech Flyer and his Aircrew Dog
Freedom in the Air: A Czech Flyer and his Aircrew Dog
Ebook384 pages6 hours

Freedom in the Air: A Czech Flyer and his Aircrew Dog

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

“Deals with a little-known aspect of the war . . . alongside the moving story of one man’s relationship with a very special animal.”—Sqn Ldr Paul Scott, Spirit of the Air
 
This biography tells of the life of Václav Robert Bozděch, a Czech airman who escaped from the Nazi invasion, fought with the French and finally arrived in Britain to fly as an air-gunner with the RAF during World War II. He returned to his homeland after World War II but escaped back to the UK again when the communists gained control. Again he joined the RAF and rose to the rank of Warrant Officer.
 
The unique part of this is that from his time in France, throughout World War II and until halfway through his second tour with the RAF, Bozděch was inseparable from his Alsatian dog, Antis, who became famous and was awarded a dog equivalent to the VC. Antis flew with his owner on many bomber raids, became the squadron mascot and was officially a serving RAF dog. He played an amazing part in the second escape from the Czech communist regime, when Bozděch was lucky to make it over the border to the US zone in Germany.
 
“The main hero of the book is not Bozděch himself, but his Alsatian, Antis . . . This book makes clear the extent of wartime and post-war suffering endured by Czechs and others fulfilling their roles in the overall search for freedom.”—Aircraft Owner & Pilot
 
“This absorbing account of flying in WWII is based on the inseparable bond between man and dog. It is a moving story with humor and sadness. A Great Read that is Highly Recommended.”—Firetrench
LanguageEnglish
Release dateNov 12, 2007
ISBN9781781594544
Freedom in the Air: A Czech Flyer and his Aircrew Dog
Author

Hamish Ross

Hamish Ross PhD became interested in the legendary wartime SAS commander Lt Col Blair 'Paddy' Mayne through a boyhood link with one of the 'L' Detachment originals. What started as a journal article soon turned into a far more substantial work when he saw the extent and quality of the archive material available. Hamish lives in Glasgow.

Read more from Hamish Ross

Related to Freedom in the Air

Related ebooks

Military Biographies For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Freedom in the Air

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

1 rating0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Freedom in the Air - Hamish Ross

    Part I

    CHAPTER ONE

    Master Aircrew

    As flies to wanton boys, are we to the gods;

    They kill us for their sport.

    William Shakespeare, King Lear

    Newspapers in Britain, during the Second World War, carried photographs of a Czech airman standing beside his handsome Alsatian dog, called Antis. However, it was the dog that was the subject of the accompanying articles; for equipped with a specially adapted oxygen mask, he accompanied his master on operational sorties over enemy territory with No. 311 (Czechoslovak) Squadron of Bomber Command. The newspaper coverage was a distraction from disappointing war news, and it appealed to the public. The phrase ‘dog of war’ often appeared in the headline; the dog’s prowess was written about in magazines and was reported by the BBC; and the war dog tag remained over the decades; it was even repeated when the Alsatian’s Dickin Medal, the so-called ‘Animal VC’, was auctioned by Sotheby’s almost half a century later. But little was written about the airman; indeed in recent time, more was known about him in the Czech Republic than in the UK, although he spent the greater part of his life in Britain, and served for eighteen years in the RAF. In part, it was his own doing: he sought anonymity in the UK because of the postwar political situation in Central Europe, where his family still lived. Yet Darryl F. Zanuck, the head of Production at Twentieth Century Fox, wanted to make a film about the airman and Antis, and sent representatives to meet him at RAF Lyneham,¹ then went himself to meet him to discuss the project. It was not until after the fall of communism that the story of Václav Robert Bozděch could be researched and told.

    That story certainly encompasses the extraordinarily strong bonding between the airman and his dog. With the passage of time, this episode in Bozděch’s life seems all the more incredible, yet it is true: a dog of great loyalty, courage and intelligence, lying alongside his master’s feet in the gun turret of a Wellington bomber, on operation after operation during the bombing campaign of 1941, sensing and sharing the men’s fear of the flak and the night fighters; he was wounded twice by enemy fire, and ultimately, in recognition of his bravery, he had the ribbon of the Dickin Medal (the ‘Animal VC’) attached to his collar by Field Marshall Wavell. Of course, the dog’s operational sorties were completely at variance with RAF regulations. But then the circumstances were unique. It all happened at a time when Britain’s position was still precarious; the United States had not yet entered the war; and Bomber Command was the only force capable of hitting the enemy heartland. It was a time too when aircrews had strong superstitions about what brought good luck in a campaign where losses were high; and then there was the verve and panache of the Czech crew, highly motivated men, their country already under the jackboot, accepting the Alsatian as one of the combat team.

    However, the story has deeper levels. It spans the final years of the Austro-Hungarian Empire to the fall of communism, and arises out of the history and politics of Central Europe in the 1930s and 1940s; it is set in the context of the airmen and their belief in what they were fighting for, and the grave injustice that they subsequently suffered at the hands of a Stalinist regime for having served their country in the west; and it does not reach resolution until the end of the twentieth century. Bozděch’s story tells of one man’s response to the powerful external forces that can break the individual; it tells of resisting, and of the acceptance of loss; it is redolent of loyalty and endurance, for which his canine comrade-in-arms is a powerful symbol.

    Like other Czechoslovak career servicemen who fled their country in 1939 in the hope of taking up arms to free it, after it fell under Nazi rule, Bozděch had first to sign the five-year contract of the French Foreign Legion and was transported to the Middle East. Then when war was declared, he transferred to the French Air Force and served with it during 1939/40; and it was during this period that he acquired the dog that would be his companion for thirteen years. After the fall of France, he made his way to England, breached Britain’s strict quarantine laws by smuggling the dog ashore, and rejoined the Czechoslovak Air Force, which was incorporated into the RAF. He served for five years in Fighter, Bomber, Training and Coastal Commands, and was decorated with the Czechoslovak Medal of Valour and the War Cross.

    Political manoeuvring among the Allies over the liberation of the occupied territories as the war moved into its final stages foreshadowed the uneasy restoration of democracy in the homeland: the West’s disinclination to trespass into the Soviet sphere of influence, as the Red Army and General Patton’s army both converged on the country’s borders during the Prague Uprising, turned out to be a strategic error.

    At the end of the war, after numerous delays, the Czechoslovak Squadrons made a triumphant return to Prague, but found that their defence of democracy had also come at a high price for their families during the Occupation, if the Gestapo discovered that relatives were serving with the Allies. Some learned that their family had perished in the death camps. In Bozděch’s case, his mother had been sent to an internment camp in Moravia.² She had survived but her health was seriously impaired.

    He became a staff captain in the Air Force, working in the Defence Ministry; and he was friendly with the country’s Foreign Minister Jan Masaryk, who was godfather to his son. He wrote several books and a radio script about the air force in the Second World War; and to his writing he brought a depth of experience, but he also had support from well-placed sources. He was given permission for one book to quote from the transcripts of speeches by President Beneš,³ and in another he was allowed to reproduce letters from the wife of the President.⁴ Two weeks after the communist coup in 1948, the body of Jan Masaryk was found amid suspicious circumstances in the courtyard of the Ministry. Bozděch later wrote that the two had met three days before Masaryk’s death, and Masaryk had told him that he knew the airman was on a purge list.⁵ No public inquiry into Masaryk’s death took place; it was put out that it was suicide. Bozděch conferred with his commanding officer⁶ and others he trusted; various pairing options for escape were considered, before he made his attempt. It was a bold attempt, carried out from the Defence Ministry on a working day; he had to leave his wife and infant son, but he took Antis with him on the perilous border crossing.

    Two months followed in refugee camps in West Germany before he was able to rejoin the RAF; and he went from staff captain to aircraftsman in one move, for while the British Air Ministry waived nationality regulations to allow former members of the Czechoslovak squadrons back into the service, its policy was to put them at the lowest rank to begin with. Bozděch’s next step was back into aircrew at an Advanced Air Training School. Antis became a celebrity with the award of the Dickin Medal. The ceremony appeared on newsreels and in the press, but Bozděch kept well out of the limelight. Officialdom now looked indulgently on that irregular crewing of a Wellington bomber in No. 311 Squadron all those years before: Antis became squadron mascot, and Bozděch was not posted overseas during the remaining years he had the dog. They made their last flight together, on a troop dropping exercise; it was a nostalgic short trip in a Dakota over East Wretham, the airfield from which No. 311 Squadron had flown when it was in Bomber Command. Aged almost fourteen years, all but three of which were spent on air force stations, Antis died, and was buried in the Animal Cemetery at Ilford.

    Bozděch had already been arraigned in his absence by the High Military Prosecutor in Prague for treason, conspiring against the state and desertion.⁷ The regime would not allow the families of émigrés to be reunited; and the partner remaining in the homeland was pressured to petition for divorce. Now flying with Transport Command, Bozděch found ways of circumventing the regime’s practice of intercepting incoming mail from marked émigrés like himself by writing under assumed names from third world countries.

    While he was stationed at RAF Lyneham, in between flying on Transport Command’s world routes, and serving in the Suez campaign, he devoted his free time and his energies to writing the manuscript of a book on his life with his dog. The outcome was impressive: the film rights of his story were bought by Twentieth Century Fox, and he had a meeting with Darryl F. Zanuck who was going to produce a film version. In 1962, Bozděch left the RAF. Civilian life was spent quietly with his second family in Devon; he became a successful small entrepreneur; and he carried out research into his old wartime squadron. He was never allowed a visa to return to his homeland, even although he appealed to the Czechoslovak Ambassador in London.⁸ He died of cancer in 1980.

    However, the story does not end with his death. Resolution of its elements could only come about after the fall of communism; and with the restoration of democracy, came restitution for those who had suffered at the hands of the regime, or had fled to avoid being persecuted. Posthumously Bozděch was advanced to the rank of colonel in the Czechoslovak Air Force; two of his books, banned for decades, were republished. Following a forensic expert’s investigation into the death of Foreign Minister Jan Masaryk in the courtyard of the Ministry all those years earlier, the Czech police opened the case, then formally concluded that Masaryk had indeed been murdered. Bozděch’s families in the UK and the Czech Republic finally met. And as a result, his story can now be told.

    A range of sources exists, both in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom. The Military Archive in Prague is particularly useful because it tracks an airman’s career during the pre-war years, wartime (for the Czechoslovak Squadrons remained in their own country’s air force at the same time as they were part of the RAF) and the postwar period. Because he was the subject of security investigation, the Archive of the Ministry of Interior of the Czech Republic contains very detailed records on Bozděch. In the United Kingdom there are the RAF operational record books for No. 311 (Czechoslovak) Squadron, which are contained in the National Archives; and information has also been obtained from the Air Historical Branch of the RAF, the Royal Air Force Personnel Management Agency and the Free Czechoslovak Air Force Association. In addition, the research is supported with transcripts of interviews with a number of Bozděch’s contemporaries, as well as his family in the UK, and in the Czech Republic.

    Maureen Bozděch has given access to her late husband’s manuscript, papers and tapes; and these offer the deepest insights into the man. His papers show that he was penetrating in discernment and tenacious in arguing about principle. He was both a maverick and yet he was service-minded. The rank that he held for some time in the mid 1950s was appositely titled Master Aircrew: he was a very capable individual. In some respects he was typically Czech: undemonstrative, self-effacing, but he would survive and he could adapt to whatever situation he found himself in – whether it was as a staff officer in the corridors of power in the Defence Ministry in Prague, or in the NCOs’ mess of a Royal Air Force station. But he was a troubled man too, ruminating silently over the suffering he had brought to his family, both during the war and under the communist regime.

    Translations from the Czech of extracts from his book Gentlemen of the Dusk add a dimension to the war years. His English language manuscript, which he titled Antis VC, adds texture to the research: it supplements the operational record books of No. 311 Squadron; it deals with areas not covered by official documentation; and while Bozděch concealed more than he revealed in the section on his escape from Prague, he developed the frontier crossing by night in April into a taut and well structured account. Above all, both the manuscript and the tapes reveal the strength of his attachment to Antis.

    He would not have seen himself in a heroic mould; but then he was a representative of a cohort of his compatriots, few of whom would have considered themselves in that mould. For they were not adventurers; they fought for freedom, and later suffered for it, through persecution or exile. So Bozděch’s story is not bound by time or place; its elements: defending ideals, the primacy of survival, the enforced separation of families, the role of Antis in his life – a variation on that ancient association between man and dog – give rise to themes that are timeless.

    CHAPTER TWO

    Young Democracy

    Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive,

    But to be young was very heaven!

    William Wordsworth, The Prelude (1850)

    At the time Václav Bozděch was born in western Bohemia in 1912, his parents were subjects of Emperor Franz Joseph, dynastic head of the Austro-Hungarian Empire; but by the time he was in his first year of primary school, they were citizens of the democratic Republic of Czechoslovakia, under the leadership of its liberator-president Tomaš Masaryk.

    The Czech lands of Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia had been part of the amorphous Austro-Hungarian Empire for centuries, and German took ascendancy over the Czech language. But the nineteenth century saw a remarkable resurgence of Czech culture, to such an extent indeed, that by the first decade of the twentieth century the Czech lands amounted to a nation without a state.¹ From those lands there emerged a number of potential political leaders – not from an existing ruling class, but intellectuals born of peasant stock – like Professor Tomaš Masaryk, who, in 1900 had helped found the Czech People’s Party, and Dr Edvard Beneš, who both played key roles in bringing the state into being. The Great War was the catalyst that brought about the political and military activity on the part of Czechs and Slovaks, which secured their statehood.

    When that war came Masaryk left Prague and based himself in London, and Beneš went to Paris; for if statehood were to be re-established to their people, it would have to be as a result of the overthrow of the empire of which they were a part, and so alliances had to be sought with the Allies. Throughout the war years these two worked tirelessly to influence opinion among the Allies. Masaryk impressed as a philosopher-statesman; Beneš was an insightful negotiator; and both of them were internationally minded. Masaryk travelled to Britain, the United States and Russia; Beneš focused on the European capitals.

    However, they did not come empty-handed to the negotiating table: Czech and Slovak volunteers in the Allied countries were prepared to be mobilised; in some cases entire Czech regiments of the Austrian-Hungarian armies turned themselves over to the Allied forces, offering to fight alongside them. Tenaciously, Masaryk, Beneš and others negotiated for the establishment of units of their countrymen within the Allied armies; and they succeeded. Units were created in Russia, France and Italy. The Czech Legions, as they became called, were led by their own officers and fought in Russia and on the Western Front. They gained a lot of respect for their discipline and spirit in the field.² Beneš recalled a visit he paid his troops on the Italian front in 1918. He had been taken through a narrow mountain defile and into a broad cavity, above which, as though in an amphitheatre, ‘were assembled about 2,000 of our troops in a deluge of flags and waving hats. There was a long outburst of cheering, and I was then deeply moved as they intoned the strains of our national hymn, accompanied by the regimental band.’³

    Throughout the war years, the two components of political activity and military action helped secure recognition for Czechoslovakia as a belligerent government on the side of the Allies, as the wording of the United States document of 2 July 1918, recognising the legitimacy of the Czechoslovak National Council makes plain.

    The Czechoslovak peoples having taken up arms against the German and Austro-Hungarian Empires, and having placed in the field organised armies, which are waging war against these Empires under officers of their own nationality and in accordance with the rule and practices of civilised nations, Czechoslovaks having in the prosecution of their independence in the present war confided the supreme political authority to the Czechoslovak National Council, the Government of the United States recognises that a state of belligerency exists between the Czechoslovaks thus organised and the German and Austrian-Hungarian Empires.

    Masaryk, in Washington on 18 October 1918, made the historic declaration of Czechoslovak independence, spelling out the nature of its governance.

    The Czechoslovak State will be a republic. In a continuous effort for progress it will guarantee full freedom of conscience, religion, science, literature and art, speech, press, assembly and of petition. The church will be separated from the state. Our democracy will be based on an equal right to vote; women will be politically, socially and culturally made equal with men. The rights of minorities will be secured by proportionate representation, national minorities will enjoy the same rights . . . privileges of the nobility will be abolished.

    France, Britain and the United States granted formal recognition; and on 28 October 1918, the new state of Czechoslovakia was legally established. It was to be the easternmost democracy in Europe – and its constitution was influenced by those of France and the United States.

    Although much of the planning for statehood took place in council chambers abroad, the aims were not just the expression of an elite group of academics on remote Elysian Fields; they had resonance for the social and democratic feelings of peasant, worker and intellectual in the Czech lands. For most it was a time to walk tall.

    Childhood and youth were a happy time for Bozděch. The family were working people from Soběkury in Přeštice, western Bohemia. There was mining in the area, and that was where his father worked. But the surrounding countryside was rich in flora and fauna. Bozděch was the only son; he had two older sisters, Maria and Pavla. There had been a third sister, Anna, but she had died about the age of seven in a childhood mishap: playing a game of make-believe, she had accidentally drunk some poisonous substance she found in an outhouse. Bozděch spent five years at the local primary school at Soběkury, then three years at the Merklin vocational school.

    Folk tradition and wood lore were the dominant educators in his early years though. From his elders Bozděch heard the tales of Bohemia, and he was initiated into the mysteries of identifying woodland plants with culinary or medicinal properties. He learned how to recognise edible fungus (a skill he never lost, as will be seen later), and he became proficient in tracking animal spoors. Superimposed on this domain of knowledge and skills were school and vocational training. Much of Czechoslovakia’s industry in the 1920s was located in Bohemia and Moravia; a tradition had developed – much as it had in Germany – that vocational training was the route to advancement, so it was quite natural that, at the age of fourteen Bozděch should begin a three-year course at technical college in Pilsen.⁶ Those three strands: story telling, affinity with nature, and technology training came together in his adult life, through his relationship with his dog, his flair as an author and the technical nature of his career.

    Thanks to the influence of the Sokol movement that began in the later part of the nineteenth century, a culture promoting physical fitness had grown and spread throughout the country. At base it encouraged individual prowess, and inculcated a sense of self-respect. Its disciplined methods and large group displays gave it a semi-military air; and although the movement was not overtly political, from an early stage it had become associated with Czech nationalism, and its displays became part of popular culture. No able-bodied boy could remain indifferent to its influence; so Bozděch became interested in athletics, and he played handball for the Soběkury club.⁷ He also had a musical bent: his favourite instrument was the accordion.

    As a teenager then, Bozděch had a well-balanced range of interests. He was also lucky, at the time he trained; for students at technical college in the late twenties were comparatively sheltered from the impact of the world-wide economic crisis. His luck continued after that: when he finished his course, which was the same year as the Wall Street crash, he began work as a locksmith. But although life moved along smoothly for many of his generation in this new democracy, the geo-political plates of Europe were beginning to tremble again.

    Centuries of subordination to an imperial power had made the Czech and Slovak collective psyche super-sensitive to the dangers of foreign domination. There was less possibility of the Habsburg Empire reappearing in mutated form, but there was a danger of a resurgent Germany; hence defence treaties had to be formed. Since the end of the nineteenth century, Czechs had looked to France and Russia as sources of support, but after the Bolshevik revolution, the Soviet Union’s stance on Czechoslovakia turned out to be less than cordial. The Soviet Union had not accepted the Versailles Treaty; and as late as 1929 the Communist Party in the Soviet Union and the Third International adopted a hostile line on an autonomous state for Czechs and Slovaks, describing it as a bourgeois creation.⁸ So Czechoslovakia, Europe’s most easterly democracy, negotiated an alliance with France. This would provide a bulwark from a democracy in the west, which also shared a border with Germany.

    The country also required its own formidable defensive capability; and two strong military arms for ground and air warfare were built up. These were supported by an advanced industrial base and high quality technology. The country already had a cadre of experienced officers and men who had served in the Czech Legions, onto which was grafted a career military; in addition, a two-year period of conscription for men was introduced.

    A sense of urgency came into political and military thinking after January 1933, when Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, and two months later had supreme power in his hands. He rejected the Versailles agreement, and adopted a pan-German policy. Dr Edvard Beneš, Czechoslovakia’s Foreign Minister, in an interview that same year, predicted that Hitler wanted to seize Austria and Czechoslovakia, occupy Danzig and crush Poland. Beneš’s approach was to work within the collective framework of the League of Nations, to which, he argued, the Soviet Union should be admitted.⁹ The rise of Nazism also brought about a change in the Soviet Union’s attitude towards Czechoslovakia. In 1935, Beneš met Joseph Stalin, and a defence treaty was signed. In the event of Czechoslovakia being attacked, the Soviet Union would support it militarily. However, the terms of the treaty with the Soviet Union were contingent on France first honouring its treaty obligation by coming to the aid of Czechoslovakia.

    At head of state level there were changes within the country. President Masaryk was re-elected overwhelmingly at each presidential election; and at the age of eighty-five, he resigned from office, to be succeeded by Dr Beneš. In political stature and intellectual gravitas, Masaryk could be said to represent Plato’s philosopher-king. He had come from a modest background; when he left school, he trained as a locksmith; and in time his abilities were recognised. He duly became a reader in philosophy and then a professor; and he was famous for a courageous stand he took against anti-Semitism. When the time came during the Great War, he was the natural choice as a leader. He had been instrumental in reestablishing statehood, and he led it until 1935. Then he went into modest retirement in the countryside; and he died two years later.

    Generally, young men did not look on two years of compulsory military service as an imposition: there was not exactly a pioneering spirit abroad, but their state had re-emerged and they were making their contribution to its security. Bozděch’s turn came in October 1934¹⁰, when he was called up. At this stage, he had no intention of making a career in the military; he was doing his stint, and then he would have to serve for a period in the reserve forces. After basic training, he became an aircraft mechanic in the air force. When his two years were up, he was demobilised, placed in the reserves, and he went to work for the Škoda company.

    However, the following months were a time for self-assessment: he had served in the branch of the armed forces which was advanced in technology; he had ability, and in the service he had found common interests with a wide range of contemporaries; now he worked in an enterprise that certainly had training opportunities and the structures for career advancement; but he questioned whether industry had the scope for his ambitions. Gradually, he came to the decision that he would make a career in the air force. On 25 October 1937¹¹ he rejoined the service, and began a process that would continue for

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1