Faces of the Hamitic People

By Khamit x Raamah Kush

Just as a cherished vase may shatter if knocked to the floor, in a like manner a lie can also be shattered by the truth.
Lying is comparable to a death-dealing poison. Thankfully, though, we can do something about it. We can stop the practice of lying; by telling the truth. In this book The Faces of the Hamitic People, I have presented the truth; that there is a Hamitic branch and that there was never a curse of Ham, also the Kushites were the fi rst Hamitic branch to institute kingship and political governments.
No white lie originates with the truth, it has only served to plunge the Hamitic branch into misery and death; the history of the slave trade well proves this. Racial prejudice and discrimination are products of mans lies and selfish desires. It was lies that led European colonists to view the natives as nothing more than animals with the gift of speech.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Xlibris US
• Release date: May 21, 2010
• ISBN: 9781453500538

Book preview

Copyright © 2010 by Khamit Raamah Kush.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

This book was printed in the United States of America.

To order additional copies of this book, contact:

Xlibris Corporation

1-888-795-4274

www.Xlibris.com

[e-mail]

75465

Contents

Facts about Myth

Preface

Introduction

Faces of the Hamitic People

Should History Be Rewritten?

The Racist Ideologies

Skin Color

Hamitic logon ke mukhde—Vol. 1

Chamde ka Rang

Dangerous Myth

Getting the Facts Right

The Curse of Ham

Historical Atrocities that They Would Like Us to Forget

The Descendants of Ham

Coloring Lies

The Hamitics Were the First to Rule as King

A Person without Knowledge of his Past Is Like a Tree without Roots

What is Noble Cause Corruption?

The Whitewashing of India

There Was No Aryan Race Just Kushites

Death of an Aryan Invasion Theory

Babylon, the Fountainhead of False Worship

After the Tower of Babel

The Forgotten People of India

Death of an Aryan invasion theory

Making the Assumption Based on One Word

The ugly outcome of racism

More Related to the Africans than to the Europeans

Family tree of the Hamitic Branch.

Melukhkha, Land of Kush

Common Threads in Mythology

What Does Kushan Mean?

Mysteries or Inventions of the Hamitic People

Conclusion

Historical problems

image003.jpg

Facts about Myth

This work has been undertaken by K. Raamah Kush, and it is an attempt to present to the people who enjoy reading ancient history a concise account of the history of the sons of Ham (the Hamitic people) within the limits of my present knowledge. I do not claim that the work contains much that is original; nearly all conclusion presented here may be found in ancient history and folklore myth. However, no one has ever considered the tradition or myth of indigenous natives of the land as historical facts; they are not just fictions from the distant past. While it is true that many are based on fiction, others are based on fact. The reason for me to consider myths is that they are the foundation for beliefs and rites still found in religions today. For example, belief in an immortal soul can be traced from ancient Assyro-Babylonian myths through Egyptian, Indian, Greek, and Roman mythology to Christendom. It has become an underlying tenet in her theology. Myths are evidence that ancient man was searching for gods as well as for a meaning in life, and my hope is that this book may go some way to fill the gap that we have in history today. The gaps I am talking about are the myths and legends that have been branded as Greek or Roman in origin. We have to look to ancient Mesopotamia and Babylon as the source of many myths that permeated these cultures, and we will see that the founders of these myths were the Hamitic people, starting with Nimrod the son of Kush. Going back in history, possibly some four thousand years, we encounter the famous Akkadian myth called the epic of Gilgamesh. Our knowledge of this is based mainly on a cuneiform text that came from the library of Ashurbanipal, who reigned 668-627 BCE in ancient Nineveh. Gilgamesh is represented to be Nimrod, but even earlier than the account in the epic of Gilgamesh is the Sumerian myth that presents Ziusudra. If you are wondering who he is, he is the counterpart of the biblical Noah, who is described as a pious, God-fearing king, constantly on the lookout for divine revelations in dreams or incantations, so there is some truth in myths that were based on facts.

While some myths are based on fiction, like the myth of Garuda—the mythological creature that the gods ride—may have originated from a legend or myth concerning Nimrod and his quest to reach heaven. It may have started after the language was changed at Babel and his quest to build the tower to reach heaven and challenge God was temporarily halted by language barriers. The legend says that Nimrod planned another way to reach the heavens. He built a large chest with four stakes at each corner, from which four large birds were attached to each stake. The chest was large enough to carry one of his most faithful viziers, probably his brother Raamah. Nimrod entered the chest, and the four great birds soared up in the air, carrying the chest with them to heaven. The Hindu mythological creature Garuda plays an important role in Krishna and Satyabhama. They ride on Garuda to kill Narakasura.

The creature resembles the Babylonian story. We see that two people are mentioned in connection to the mythological bird, and in both places the resemblance is clear that one borrowed it from the original legend that revolved around Nimrod. The Greeks also had a mythological giant bird that was sacred, but the origin was not Greek at all. The Greeks got it from the Canaanite’s mythological phoenix. The Egyptians also had their own version of the phoenix. The recurring theme in all these cultures is the common thread of mythology that had its origin with the ancient Sumerians, the Hamitic people.

Sumerian

image005.jpg

Indian version

image007.jpg

In this book I have identified Melukhkha with India. Some may object to this identification, but the evidence is very clear—Melukhkha cannot be found in Arabia as some historians had previously thought, the name of which appears in cuneiform inscriptions of about 2000 BCE. However, archaeological discoveries revealed that the land of Melukhkha was not the Sinai but that it was located in India. I have made clear that Kush is divided in three major branches: we have the Ethiopian Kushites, the Arabian Kushites, and the Indian Kushites or Asiatics.

All artwork and drawings have been made by myself, Khamit Raamah Kush. Also, a number of pictures have been included, pictures I took when I was in these places. I have listed just a few of them: Panama, Thailand, Costa Rica, Mexico, Nicaragua, China, Colombia, India, El Salvador, and Honduras. Not to mention the large number of manuscripts that I have compiled over the years, these are just a few in this book, titled Faces of the Hamitic, volume 1. I have reserved the rest of the manuscript for the second and, possibly, a third edition.

image009.jpg

Preface

The term Hamitic or Khamitic comes from Ham, one of Noah’s three sons. He was born after 2470 BCE before the Flood. Some have considered him the youngest of Noah’s sons; however, he is listed in second place at Genesis 5:32 and 6:10. Some believe that the expression youngest son at Genesis 9:24 refers to Noah’s grandson Canaan and not Ham; nevertheless, the evidence shows him to be the second-born son of Noah.

Ham was the father of four sons—Cush (Kush), Mizraim (Miztrayim), Put (Seth), and Canaan. Ham married before the Flood. Along with his wife, his father and mother, and his two brothers and their wives, he survived the Flood, and his sons were born after the Flood.

And it came about that in their journeying eastward, they discovered a valley plain in the land of Shinar (modern-day Iraq), and they took up dwelling there. It was at this location that the son of Kush, Nimrod, began his great building project. God displayed his disapproval at the building of the city and of a false religious tower therein because of the builders’ purpose to make a celebrated name for themselves and to keep from being scattered all over all the surface of the earth. Though the first empire on earth, this Babylonian Empire of Nimrod, did not become the first world power of Bible record. The reason is Babel’s political power was weakened because its builders, now disunited by differing languages, were thus made by Jehovah to scatter all over the earth. Interestingly, it was Kush’s brother Mizraim; his descendants became the first world power of Bible record—the ancient Egyptians.

It was always assumed by historians and others that Ham’s descendants are all black in color. Some were, but not all his descendants had dark skin. They descended from Ham’s son Mizraim. The Egyptians are light brown to very pale brown skin. Ham’s son Canaan was the forefather of the white-skinned Canaanites. From Kush predominantly came the black and the brown and some light brown skin color. Put also had descendants that were dark to light in color.

It should be noted that all the descendants of Noah spoke the same language; when did the change of language took place? Nimrod was the founder and king of the first empire to come into existence after the Flood. He distinguished himself as a mighty hunter. The beginning of Nimrod’s kingdom included the cities of Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, all in the land of Shinar. Under his direction the building of Babel (Babylon) and its tower began (Nimrod), little by little transforming the state of affairs into a tyranny, holding that the only way to detach men from the fear of God was by making them continuously dependent upon his own power. He obviously had a wrong view of the Flood. He threatened to have his revenge on God if He wished to inundate the earth again for he would build a tower higher than the water could reach and avenge the destruction of their forefathers. The people were eager to follow this advice of Nimrod, deeming it slavery to submit to God, so they set out to build the tower, and it rose with a speed beyond all expectation. After the building of the Tower of Babel, Nimrod extended his domain to the territory of Assyria, and there built Nineveh and Rehoboth-Ir and Calah and Resen between Nineveh and Calah: this was the great city. Nimrod was the first after the Flood to found a kingdom, to unite the fragments of scattered patriarchal rule and consolidate them under himself as sole head and master, and it was during this time that the language of man was changed. They gradually left off from building the tower, yet that did not stop Nimrod from completing it.

This book is to educate those of Hamitic origin who may be wondering about who they are, where they came from, and how they are related to other people. I hope that the reader uses his own discernment when reading this book. I myself have no formal training as an archeologist or a historian. But I have been trained in the field of forensic science, and I do know that evidence don’t lie; people do. The same can be said of archeology. The facts don’t lie; people do. The greatest factor obscuring the truth is false propaganda that have wielded great influence on recorded history and the way in which we have learned what they have thought.

But I take no consideration to assist them in their lies by my silence. The standards of the Europeans and of Western world should not be applied to the Hamitic branch for the reason that it was the Hamitic branch that first started on the path of a civilized world, and if any standards are to be set, it would make sense to start from them first. The purpose of this book is to show inconsistencies of the way in which they have taught history and to show that much evidence has been suppressed or carelessly omitted. Although the Bible record clearly shows the Canaanites to be Hamitic, the majority of reference works speak of them as of Semitic origin this classification is based on the evidence of a Semitic language spoken by the Canaanites, and some Kushites we need to keep in mind that language does not alter or change the race of a person.

Josephus, a Jewish historian, gives an account of the nations of Kush, son of Ham and grandson of Noah. For of the four sons of Ham, time has not at all hurt the name of Kush; for the Ethiopians, over whom he reigned, are even at this day, both by themselves and by all men in Asia, are all Kushites.

Much of the documented Khamitic ancient history pertains to the Egyptian dynasties and those of the Hittites that they have falsely called Semitic; when they used this term, the reader doesn’t know if they mean linguistically or ethnically. Nevertheless, we always tend to think in terms of ethnicity. There have been many attempts by European and Western scholars and scientists to whitewash Egypt of first, the historical evidence of it being part of the larger Khamitic Empire that began with Kush, and next, to take away its origin and beginnings.

The same thing was done with India; it was heavily whitewashed to the point that some claim that its beginning is obscure that we cannot know for sure who were the original inhabitants, and some have falsely stated that it was the Aryan who founded the empire of India.

India and Egypt became an easy target of the whitewashing corruption of history. To some extent, when people spoke of Egypt, they made it sound like it was a country by itself and had no connection with Africa, and they made India a land of supreme Aryan white people. As you read along, you will see that the history of the Hamitic people should be rewritten.

Native Indians

image011.jpg

Introduction

As mentioned the term Hamitic comes from Ham, the second-born son of Noah, and his descendants are Hamitic, meaning from Ham. Not all of Ham’s children are black as how some have claimed; they range from very dark to actually white in color. We must not lose sight of the fact that Adam and Eve possessed the genes to produce every nation that exists today, nor can we dismiss the fact that all these races and skin tones existed in the beginning of time before the Flood. It is not logical to conclude that the dark-skinned race came into existence after the Flood, for Ham, Noah’s son, was born before the Flood, and it becomes unreasonable to conclude that he was the only dark-skinned person at that time. The possibility exists that Noah was dark and his wife light skinned or vice versa. This would be similar to how a mixed-race couple often has children that vary greatly in color from one another. Since God obviously desired humanity to continue to be diverse in appearance, this was clearly a feature that manifested itself in the pre-Flood days, and this manifestation is clear in the sons of Ham. Since God gave Adam and Eve the ability to produce children of different skin tones, this diversity existed from the day that Adam and Eve began to produce offspring.

Today some still make false claims that the light-skinned Hamites or Hamitic people are a mixture of Hamitic and Semitic, simply making this assumption on the color of their skin and the language that some spoke. The language may be related to Semitic; that does not mean that it is of Semitic origin. The reason is clear—all the sons of Noah spoke the same language that Noah spoke, and he did not spoke Semitic. Noah spoke the language that Adam spoke. The language of man was the same up until the descendants of Noah took up building the Tower of Babel. This was when the language was changed by God. So to make the assumption that some of Ham’s children spoke Semitic is a gross mistake; we can also come to the conclusion that some of Ham’s children kept the same language that they originally spoke. The language that they spoke could well be a language that was similar to that of Noah rather than that of Shem. It is often overlooked that Noah did not speak a Semitic language; the term Semitic simply comes from one of Noah’s sons, Shem, so it is safe to say that the language of Noah was Adamic—from Adam. Secular history does not reveal the origin of the Hebrew language or, for that matter, of any of the most ancient languages known, such as Sumerian, Akkadian (Assyro-Babylonian), Aramaean, and Egyptian. This is because these tongues appear already fully developed in the earliest written records found. The Bible is the only historical source giving reliable evidence of the origin of the language that we know as Hebrew. It was, of course, spoken by the Israelite descendants of Abram the Hebrew, who, in turn, descended from Noah’s son Shem. Shem’s language would remain the same as it had been previously, the one language that had existed from Adam onward.

When God changed man’s language, some of them may have been given a language that was similar to that of Noah, and some have made the assumption that only Noah’s son Shem kept the same language as Noah. While there’s a lot of evidence that the son of Ham Canaan and some of the Kushites, his descendants, spoke a language related to the one we now call Semitic, the correct term would be Adamic tongue. This, however, is not evidence to classify them as Semitic or to classify the language as Semitic; it could well have been a similar language to that of Noah. All historians and archeologists are blinded to the point that they cannot entertain the fact that some of Ham’s children or one that was closely related to Noah may have also kept the same language; there’s evidence that shows that some of Ham’s descendants spoke a Hamitic language, as well as one that is closely related to what they have branded Semitic. Evidence also shows that some of Ham’s children did not migrate; they stayed in Mesopotamia, and communication with the Semitic branch was possible without the use of an interpreter.

As to the classification by color, we must also remember that the name of Adam also means red, possibly denoting that he had a dark undertone. This would lend support to the Jewish tradition that he was made from red earth, so it’s not likely that he had a white skin tone. It is possible that Noah’s wife was of a different color than Noah. Maybe all eight of them were of mixed colors, which would mean that they possessed the genetics to produce children of different colors. We do not know this with certainty, but what is clear is that this genetic diversity is only found in Ham’s children. Color was never a factor in the days of Adam or in the days after the Flood. In Genesis it states that they are one people and there was one language. The confusion of language was not to segregate but to spread the entire human race to every corner of the earth.

Scholars have long presented Egypt as the ‘most ancient civilization’ and as the source of many of mankind’s earliest inventions and progress. Certain Egyptian architectural methods, the use of the wheel, perhaps the basic principles of their pictographic writing, and particularly the fundamental features of Egyptian religion are all thought to have had a Babylonian origin. This, of course, is in accord with the Bible record of the dispersion of peoples following the Flood

The best known achievements in Egyptian architecture are the pyramids constructed at Giza by Pharaohs Khufu (Cheops), Khafre, and Menkure of what is styled the Fourth Dynasty. The largest, that of Khufu, has a base covering about 5.3 ha (13 acres), with a peak some 137 m (450 ft) high (the equivalent of a modern 40-story building). It is calculated that 2,300,000 blocks of stone, averaging 2.3 metric tons each, were used. The blocks were shaped so carefully that they fitted within a few millimeters. Colossal temples were also built; one at Karnak, in Thebes was the largest columnar structure ever constructed by man.

Education seems to have consisted primarily of schools for the scribes, run by the priests. Besides being expert in Egyptian writing, royal scribes also were thoroughly familiar with Aramaic cuneiform; already in the middle of the second millennium B.C.E. subject rulers in Syria and Palestine regularly communicated with the Egyptian capital in Aramaic. Egyptian mathematics was sufficiently well developed to allow for the stupendous construction feats mentioned previously, and some knowledge of geometric and algebraic principles is evident. It may be noted that "Moses was instructed