Poverty of Nations: Quality Education and National Development with Special Reference to South Asia
By Namdar Khan
()
About this ebook
Poverty of Nations is a deep inside look at the lack of education amongst South Asia's poor and its long-lasting and deep-seated effect on the wealth of nations. While the book uses 1960s-1970s numbers, the message-to invest in education of all types-is timeless. This book is a must-read for everyone, but most importantly for economic, p
Related to Poverty of Nations
Related ebooks
Poverty of Nations: Quality Education and National Development with Special Reference to South Asia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting Captivity in the Early Modern Atlantic: Circulations of Knowledge and Authority in the Iberian and English Imperial Worlds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiving with Difference: How to Build Community in a Divided World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThinking Through the Cold War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe End of American Childhood: A History of Parenting from Life on the Frontier to the Managed Child Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Beyond Eurocentrism: A New View of Modern World History Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Winter in America: A Cultural History of Neoliberalism, from the Sixties to the Reagan Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorkers on Arrival: Black Labor in the Making of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Did They Kill?: Cambodia in the Shadow of Genocide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe End of a Global Pox: America and the Eradication of Smallpox in the Cold War Era Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Development Dilemma: Security, Prosperity, and a Return to History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComing of Age in Anthropology: Commentaries on Growing up in the Global Village Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConceiving the Future: Pronatalism, Reproduction, and the Family in the United States, 1890-1938 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaterializing the Nation: Commodities, Consumption, and Media in Papua New Guinea Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Class Unknown: Undercover Investigations of American Work and Poverty from the Progressive Era to the Present Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChina's Green Religion: Daoism and the Quest for a Sustainable Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fall of the US Empire: Global Fault-Lines and the Shifting Imperial Order Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFailing Forward: The Rise and Fall of Neoliberal Conservation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Less Was More: Memories of a Sustainable Lifestyle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Nation Among Nations: America's Place in World History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Risk, Disaster, and Vulnerability: An Essay on Humanity and Environmental Catastrophe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sciences and the Humanities: Conflict and Reconciliation Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Rooted Globalism: Arab–Latin American Business Elites and the Politics of Global Imaginaries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRethinking American History in a Global Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFor the Common Good: A New History of Higher Education in America Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Unrivaled: Why America Will Remain the World's Sole Superpower Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How America Became Capitalist: Imperial Expansion and the Conquest of the West Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Available Means of Persuasion, The: Mapping a Theory and Pedagogy of Multimodal Public Rhetoric Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Global Commons: An Introduction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inside American Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix (10th Anniversary, Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lost Tools of Learning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Think Like a Lawyer--and Why: A Common-Sense Guide to Everyday Dilemmas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Speed Reading: How to Read a Book a Day - Simple Tricks to Explode Your Reading Speed and Comprehension Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Making Friends: Helping Socially Challenged Teens and Young Adults Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How To Do Motivational Interviewing: A guidebook for beginners Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Raising Human Beings: Creating a Collaborative Partnership with Your Child Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Are You Still Sending Your Kids to School? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Easy Spanish Stories For Beginners: 5 Spanish Short Stories For Beginners (With Audio) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Securities Industry Essentials Exam For Dummies with Online Practice Tests Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Poverty of Nations
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Poverty of Nations - Namdar Khan
PREFACE
by
Professor Charles S. Benson
This is a book about the central problem of our age. Each year, a rising number of people are born into abject poverty. This tragic fact stands alongside another fact, namely, that the rate of exploitation of expendable resources of our planet rises decade by decade. Some feast exceedingly well at the world’s banquet table, but the crumbs that the rich drop do not suffice to succor the poor. As Robert McNamara stated at the annual meeting of the world bank, Nairobi, on September 24, 1973,
Absolute poverty is a condition of life so degraded by disease, illiteracy, malnutrition, and squalor as to deny its victims basic human necessities; a condition of life so limited as to prevent realization of the genes with which one is born; a condition of life so degrading as to insult human dignity; and yet a condition of life so common as to be the lot of some 40 percent of the peoples of the developing countries."
And the largest number of persons in abject poverty, by far, live in South Asia.
Professor Namdar Khan is uniquely prepared to examine the contribution that education has made to the eradication of poverty in the Third World, and he writes with special competence about the problems of education and development in South Asia. During my own brief tenure as foreign educational advisor in the subcontinent, I found his name to hold the highest respect among educators in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Professor Namdar Khan brings to bear a lifetime of observation and reflection on the accomplishments, the shortfalls, and the potential of educational systems for promoting growth and ending poverty.
No honest student of public policy can now claim that state-supported education has not been particularly helpful to unnumbered millions of poor people in the Third World. As John Simmons has written:
During the past ten years many observers have noted that formal education was failing to meet the needs of the poor majority. Formal education provided training for urban white-collar jobs while lost jobs, and most skills required for development, tended to be manual and in rural areas. Moreover, students from poor families are usually unable to continue formal education to the university level. Instead of acquiring useful skills, the poor are usually taught by formal education that they are inferior. (The Education Dilemma, New York, Pergamon Press, 1980, p. 7).
Professor Namdar Khan helps us understand why such a summary statement may be true by revealing the details of how educational systems function in the Third World, and it is in the details that the truth lies.
It is not enough, nevertheless, either to deplore or to explain the failures of education systems toward poor people. Education remains a necessary condition for individual advancement. Hence, one needs to imagine that educational systems can be changed to become more relevant for poor people and more accessible to them as well. I can happily report that Professor Namdar Khan shows us precisely what steps Third World countries need to take to bring about these changes that are so urgently needed.
University of California
Berkeley, June 1983
PREFACE
to the second edition of
Poverty of Nations
by
Mr. Humayun Namdar Khan
Mr. Jamshed Namdar Khan
1
In early 2000s, a delegation of Pakistan’s education ministry visited South Korea to study their education system for its success and achievement, and how their educational success supported their economic growth after the Korean War, and in particular their exponential growth since the mid-1960s. This delegation visited the Korean education minister, who was a little surprised that a Pakistani education delegation would visit South Korea for this purpose. He asked his staff member if they had the country right, only to confirm that it was truly Pakistan. He called the delegation into his office and asked them again if they were really an education delegation from Pakistan. This was a strange encounter and the Pakistani delegation was confused why the minister repeatedly asked for confirmation.
As the meeting went on with introductions and pleasantries, the South Korean minister paused and asked his staff member to go back to the library and bring a particular paper for the discussion. The minister was very proud that this paper set their country’s guidelines and changed their strategy on education and economic development, and they have used these guidelines again and again whenever they went off track. The Pakistani delegation was also excited, as they were ready to review this paper and learn South Korea’s secrets.
After about half an hour, the staff member brought back a bound journal one inch thick. The delegation thought this must be a simple plan. But surprise! The paper was a short strategy prepared by none other than the Pakistani government, which was prepared for its third five-year plan (1965 – 1970) during the presidency of Ayub Khan, and the main author for the education and training section was none other than Professor Namdar Khan. The minister explained that after Pakistan had devised this plan, a South Korean delegation visited Pakistan circa 1968, and met with Professor Khan several times on the subject of education and training.
Professor Khan believed primary, secondary, poly-technical, vocational, and university education constitute a pyramid, with each step expanding with the other—and that poor countries lack the resources to support the cost of simultaneous and equalized development at all steps. He further explained that an increased output at one level must equal expansion at every level. The plan further emphasized priorities even for the poorest of countries, where poly-technical and vocational education with specialized training can be afforded even by the poorest of nations. Professor Khan had argued that this training goes hand in hand with economic development of a poor country. Further, he believed that the graduates of the poly-technic institutes would be instant contributors to the economic development of a country. Pakistan sorely needed technical people and technicians like electricians, carpenters, home builders, motor mechanics, engineers, and the like.
The South Korean minister explained that this idea alone was the basis for South Korea’s success, and had resulted in double-digit economic growth in the 1970s and 1980s. What a novel and simple idea,
said the minister. The Pakistani delegation left embarrassed.
This story has been told to Professor Khan’s family members by several members of this delegation.
Professor Khan believed in these ideas throughout his career in South Asia (initially during his early career in India and then Pakistan), then later when he championed Comparative Education in England and the United States. This book, Poverty of Nations, the culmination of his ideas, along with years and years of fighting for education, was completed in Berkeley in 1989. Starting in the 1950s through 1971, he worked tirelessly on education and development in Pakistan, a country well suited for his ideas, and for a few short years, he was able to obtain sufficient funding to lay out his plan. He started many poly-technical and vocational schools, initially in the Punjab and East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), then the whole of Pakistan, while also funding new primary and secondary schools.
Additionally, he founded the Institute of Education and Research at the University of the Punjab in Lahore, which brought in scholars from around the globe to study education systems and development in poor nations. He also established international funding for this institute, which supported his ideas for the country. He hosted many professors from various international universities, including ones from British and American universities. His main message to the international scholars was that the two-thirds of humanity starving today will one day become a major problem to the one-third living in the rich world—and that the need for investment in them is essential.
He argued, too, that the underdeveloped world had been stuck in economic strata established under colonial rule that was later replaced by corrupt elite who wanted to retain the status quo. The simple idea of training a populous to support technical fields in industry, manufacturing, transportation, and agriculture are only successful if a nation is willing to spend the resources, he argued.
After partition of British India, Pakistan had been left with a new labor force without much of any technical training and even less education. His efforts started many of these poly-technical schools throughout Punjab and Pakistan, which included learning basic mechanics, machinery production, factory trades, and agriculture trades. Fruits of his efforts resulted in a mini-industrial growth in Pakistan, and export of Pakistan poly-technical labor to the Middle East and Southeast Asia.
The need for primary education also existed throughout the country, and the new budget called for constructing high schools in cities and middle schools in rural areas. Further, the plan emphasized teacher education. Professor Khan said that if education is to play an effective role in the social and economic growth of a nation, the teacher and his education must receive the highest priority.
Another part of the plan was to provide further international training to college professors who would be selected and sent to various universities in England and the United States for further education.
The education budget for Pakistan increased from 1965 until 1971. This comprehensive plan was appreciated by several countries, and delegations from South Korea, Singapore, China, and Malaysia came to Professor Khan for additional details, in order to adopt them for their own countries. These countries are now some of the most advanced countries, with very high rates of education.
The plan also recognized the need for education for women, adults, and people living in rural and backward areas. For women’s education, Professor Khan recognized that women’s education stems from deep-seated social and cultural attitudes, and a radical change need be applied to yield better results. To achieve this, he emphasized cooperation from various national women’s organizations and giving equal education for female teachers to teach primary schools in the country. The change called for primary schools to be common for boys and girls. For adults, he recommended pilot projects of adult education throughout the country. For rural and backward areas, the emphasis was on training skills and providing special assistance for primary education.
In this book, Professor Khan indicates that the problems of education still persisted around the world, even in rich countries where the wealth of those countries is diverted by those interested in political success but not national success. Professor Khan was astute with regard to these issues and was considerably disheartened by the developments in Pakistan in the early 1970s. Thus, after a lifetime of struggles and successes for education, he decided to leave the country. The main problem, Professor Khan points out, is that poor nations tend to have massive corruption that steals funds and results in deficiencies in education and development. This book is more than applicable, even for today’s both developing and developed nations.
Starting from his higher education in England in the 1930s until he retired in Berkeley, California, in the mid-1970s, Professor Khan reviewed and compared educational systems in poor, developing, and rich countries, including countries that offered free education at all levels. This specialty of comparative education was in high demand by the best universities in England, Europe, and the United States.
Professor Khan had open invitations to teach comparative education, but resisted the temptation, as he was doing great work in Pakistan. He instead hosted several renowned education scholars from the United States, who were sponsored under the Ford Foundation. They included Professor James Kelly from the Ford Foundation; Professors Ernest Horn, Bill Porter, and Chris W. Jung from Indiana University; and Professor Charles S. Benson from the University of California, Berkeley.
Professor Khan’s lifetime of achievements ended in 1971 when a new government reduced his funding for education and research. He decided to leave South Asia for good. Both Herman B Wells, a long-term Indiana University chancellor, and Professor Benson from Berkeley, asked him to join their respective institutions. Professor Khan chose Berkeley, which suited his liberal thoughts and ideas better, although he remained great friends with Herman B Wells at Indiana.
2
Mission
Professor Namdar Khan studied at the University of London’s South Asia Studies, or SOS, (now called the South Asia and African Studies [SOAS]) in the 1930s. He originally had plans to study law, as most of the British Indian students in London at that time did, but his thoughts on poverty in British India pulled him toward education. His studies, however, were cut short by the onset of World War II, and he sailed back to India in 1939.
He started his career in India as a lecturer at Government College, Shahpur, in 1942. He then joined Government College, Montgomery, in 1944. Soon after that, he became its first native principal after the previous British principal retired. After partition, he joined Government College, Lahore, as its first post-partition Pakistani head of history and political science departments, and stayed there until 1954.
He was an avid tennis player and often rode his bike from Scotch Corner, Lahore, to the college to play his favorite sport.
In 1954, Professor Khan joined Government College, Lyallpur as its principal, and then became principal at Central Training College, Lahore, which had been established to train teachers in education and provide them with standardized curriculum. This is where Professor Khan realized that training teachers and professors was just as important as the educational development of a country.
Soon after, Professor Khan joined the Planning Commission of Pakistan in Karachi in 1964 as their Chief, Education Section, and in 1965, he developed the comprehensive third five-year plan for education development of Pakistan.
Professor Khan also believed in full physical fitness of the young, and encouraged college students to participate in sports as a means of building both physique and moral development alongside scholarship. While as a principal at Government College, Lyallpur, he encouraged the hockey team to develop a regimen of exercise and nutrition as a means of achieving excellence. As an advanced innovative approach, he also bought and distributed multivitamin pills for the hockey team and advised taking a daily pill for overall physical well-being and development. The hockey team did, in fact, find success and won tournaments.
Professor Khan was friends with a number of the intellectual, political, and artistic elite of Pakistan. They included Nobel Laurate in Physics, Dr. Abdus Salam; pre-partition cricketer, professor, and colleague, Dr. Jahangir Khan; colleague and great friend at Government College, Lahore, and Lenin Peace Prize winner (and nominated for the Nobel Prize), Faiz Ahmad Faiz; poet and great friend, Ghulam Mustafa Sufi Tabassum; poet and national anthem writer, Hafeez Jalandhari; poet and Urdu literature writer, M.D. Taseer; and many more. Faiz, while in political self-exile in Beirut, Lebanon, often wrote letters with poetry to Professor Khan.
While Hafeez Jalandhari was composing the national anthem of Pakistan, he invited Professor Khan, amongst others, to form a committee to provide their thoughts and critiques for the various verses of the national anthem. As he was fluent in Urdu, Hindi, Punjabi, Sanskrit, and Persian, he made many suggestions for the anthem, which were well received and incorporated by Jalandhari in the final form. Professor Khan often related that Jalandhari would request that members of the committee provide their suggestions by singing them (Tarranum), such that he could judge the meter, cadence, and rhythm for incorporation.
3
Family
Professor Mian Namdar Khan (Jan 19, 1915 – Dec 17, 2002), was born in Kapurthala State. He is the son of Khan Bahadur Mian Altaf Hussain Khan (1874 – 1946) of Batala (Sub-Divisional Officer of Amritsar and Montgomery Districts, colonizing the Punjab) and Mehndi Begum (1893 – 1970) of Kapurthala State; grandson of Khan Bahadur Mian Hussain Bakhsh Khan (1838 – 1878) of Batala (Rajput lord and defender of his estate in Batala); and (maternal) great grandson of Col. Ali Altof Khan (1842 – 1935) of Kapurthala State (highest ranking officer of the Kapurthala State artillery forces, landlord in Lyallpur, and barrister at Lincoln’s Inn, London, 1884 and 1905). Professor Khan is the direct descendant of Rajput Raja Rai Ram Dev Bhatti, who founded the town of Batala in 1465 AD. Professor Khan passed away in Lahore while attending his granddaughter’s wedding in December 2002.
Professor Khan married Saeeda (Ghani) Khan (b. Jan 26, 1926) in 1946 in Nabha State. The wedding was held at Sardar Bakhshi Wali Mohammad Khan’s 100-acre-garden Asiana Estate, also attended by the Maharaja of Nabha and other nobles of the state. Both Professor Khan and Saeeda were in Srinagar, Kashmir, in the summer of 1947 when partition of British India was announced, including last-minute boundary changes to Gurdaspur District and