Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Summary Of "Max Weber: Comprehensive Sociology" By Ivancich & Lens: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES
Summary Of "Max Weber: Comprehensive Sociology" By Ivancich & Lens: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES
Summary Of "Max Weber: Comprehensive Sociology" By Ivancich & Lens: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES
Ebook79 pages34 minutes

Summary Of "Max Weber: Comprehensive Sociology" By Ivancich & Lens: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Weber argued that the origin of the social sciences was practical: it was a technique. But later, when it assumed the character of an academic science, the distinction between existential knowledge ("what is") and normative knowledge ("what should be") was blurred. In a newspaper in which he participated, Weber will distinguish three levels of economics: a) what is strictly economic is the institutions created for an economic purpose, such as a bank or a factory, b) what is related to the economic, for example religion, which it does not directly manifest an economic character, but it has consequences of that type, and c) what is conditioned by the economic, such as art. To address the issue, we have summarized the essentials of "Max Weber: Comprehensive Sociology", by Norberto Ivancich and José Luis Lens.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateNov 17, 2021
ISBN9798201899394
Summary Of "Max Weber: Comprehensive Sociology" By Ivancich & Lens: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES
Author

MAURICIO ENRIQUE FAU

Mauricio Enrique Fau nació en Buenos Aires en 1965. Se recibió de Licenciado en Ciencia Política en la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Cursó también Derecho en la UBA y Periodismo en la Universidad de Morón. Realizó estudios en FLACSO Argentina. Docente de la UBA y AUTOR DE MÁS DE 3.000 RESÚMENES de Psicología, Sociología, Ciencia Política, Antropología, Derecho, Historia, Epistemología, Lógica, Filosofía, Economía, Semiología, Educación y demás disciplinas de las Ciencias Sociales. Desde 2005 dirige La Bisagra Editorial, especializada en técnicas de estudio y materiales que facilitan la transición desde la escuela secundaria a la universidad. Por intermedio de La Bisagra publicó 38 libros. Participa en diversas ferias del libro, entre ellas la Feria Internacional del Libro de Buenos Aires y la FIL Guadalajara.

Read more from Mauricio Enrique Fau

Related to Summary Of "Max Weber

Related ebooks

Book Notes For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Summary Of "Max Weber

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Summary Of "Max Weber - MAURICIO ENRIQUE FAU

    Summary Of Max Weber: Comprehensive Sociology By Ivancich & Lens

    UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES

    MAURICIO ENRIQUE FAU

    Published by BOOKS AND SUMMARIES BY MAURICIO FAU, 2021.

    While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein.

    SUMMARY OF MAX WEBER: COMPREHENSIVE SOCIOLOGY BY IVANCICH & LENS

    First edition. November 17, 2021.

    Copyright © 2021 MAURICIO ENRIQUE FAU.

    ISBN: 979-8201899394

    Written by MAURICIO ENRIQUE FAU.

    Table of Contents

    Title Page

    Copyright Page

    Summary Of Max Weber: Comprehensive Sociology By Ivancich & Lens (UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES)

    Sign up for MAURICIO ENRIQUE FAU's Mailing List

    Further Reading: Summary Of Comprehensive Sociology And Rationality In Max Weber By Leopoldo Halperín

    Also By MAURICIO ENRIQUE FAU

    About the Author

    About the Publisher

    Ivancich, Norberto & Lens, José Luis

    MAX WEBER: COMPREHENSIVE SOCIOLOGY

    The science debate in turn-of-the-century Germany

    Max Weber, who has been called the bourgeois Marx, became a sociologist arguing with the shadow of Marx. The greatest concern in his life was the origin and nature of capitalism. Weber generalized and modified Marx's method, but what he most questioned was his revolutionary conclusions, and his conviction of the superiority of socialism over capitalism. But it is wrong to say that Weber went to the ideas breaking with the material of Marx, as Parsons' functionalism puts it. This means ignoring that for Marx ideas played an important role. What Weber rejects is vulgar and dogmatic Marxism, which Marx himself denied.

    The concept of comprehensive sociology

    Weber argued that the origin of the social sciences was practical: it was a technique. But later, when he assumed the character of an academic science, the distinction between existential knowledge (what is) and normative knowledge (what must be) was blurred. In a newspaper in which he participated, Weber will distinguish three levels of economics: a) what is strictly economic is the institutions created for an economic purpose, such as a bank or a factory, b) what is related to the economic, for example religion, which it does not directly manifest an economic character, but it has consequences of that type, and c) what is conditioned by the economic, such as art.

    The State, to the extent that it carries out economic activities by itself, is an economic phenomenon, and to the extent that its measures have consequences for economic life, it is related to the economic. Insofar as economic interests influence government policies, the State is conditioned by the economic. THE ECONOMIC, for Weber as for Marx, is linked to the material struggle for existence. To understand it, we must study those three levels, looking at the total society as a social system. We must reject, yes, the materialist conception of history , in the sense of objective causes ", but the economic interpretation of history must be encouraged.

    The term INTERPRETATION is related to the idea that every perspective, for Weber, can only give a partial, limited and one-sided explanation. But in order to capture reality, you have to see as many approaches as possible. Therefore, it would be wrong to stay with an only economic vision of the social. You can never encompass total reality, and this also applies to the natural sciences. Some kind of abstraction is always needed, along with the selection of problems, phenomena, and relationships, which depends on the values ​​of the researcher or his sponsor.

    THE METHOD OF SOCIAL SCIENCES IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM THE METHOD OF NATURAL SCIENCES, because there is a great difference between physical and cultural phenomena. This difference is that IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES THERE IS SIGNIFICANCE of cultural events, a VALUABLE ORIENTATION. While a cell, a stone or a carbohydrate do not give values ​​or meanings, men (object of study of the social sciences) do. According to our values ​​we will privilege certain portions of reality. Empirical data cannot

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1