Confessions of a Kept Man: My Strange Friendship with Silent Movie Star Patsy Ruth Miller
()
About this ebook
Jeffrey L. Carrier
Jeffrey L. Carrier was born in 1963 and grew up in Mountain City, Tennessee. A 1981 graduate of Johnson County High School, he attended Carson-Newman College for two years and graduated with a degree in English from Northern Michigan University in Marquette, in 1985. After briefly pursuing a graduate degree in film history at NYU, in New York City, he continued to live in that city for ten years, working for the advertising agency of Ogilvy & Mather. He was also an account executive at a stock photography agency for several years and has been an on-line retailer since 2002, specializing in film memorabilia. He is the author of four previous books: Upon a Lonely Hill: The Cemeteries of Johnson County, Tennessee, 1985; Jennifer Jones: A Bio-Bibliography, 1990; Tallulah Bankhead: A Bio-Bibliography, 1991; and At the Corner of Guilt and Delight, Growing Up Gay in a Small, Southern Town, 2022. He also assisted silent film actress Patsy Ruth Miller in the writing of her memoir, published in 1988. He currently lives in Columbus, Ohio.
Related to Confessions of a Kept Man
Related ebooks
Marie Prevost Canadian Film Actress of Early Hollywood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStardust and Shadows: Canadians in Early Hollywood Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Nick and Nora: The Thin Man and the Films of William Powell and Myrna Loy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWinnie Lightner: Tomboy of the Talkies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rise and Fall of the Silent Film Era, Vol II: The Silent Film Actresses Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn Gilbert: The Last of the Silent Film Stars Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Damsels and Divas: European Stardom in Silent Hollywood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNorma - The Life & Death of Rudolph Valentino's Beauty Queen Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDay Dreams Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Farrows of Hollywood: Their Dark Side of Paradise Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrançoise Hardy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Golden Age of Hollywood Movies 1931-1943: Vol III, Jean Harlow Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBrick Lane. East-End Pub-Share. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLady in White Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnne Billson on Film 2010 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCleared for Take-Off: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Better Davis and Other Stories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMr. S: My Life with Frank Sinatra Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bobby In Naziland: A Tale of Flatbush Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHollywood Vault: Film Libraries before Home Video Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlay It Again Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Showmen, Sell It Hot!: Movies as Merchandise in Golden Era Hollywood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Favorite Horror Movie Franchises: Streaks of Terror Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Big Show: High Times and Dirty Dealings Backstage at the Academy Awards® Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Lost World of DeMille Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Silver Lake Chronicles: Exploring an Urban Oasis in Los Angeles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCuriosities of the American Stage Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Two Lovers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHollywood Exiles in Europe: The Blacklist and Cold War Film Culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Performing Arts For You
Yes Please Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Storytelling: Why Stories Make Us Human and How to Tell Them Better Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5As You Wish: Inconceivable Tales from the Making of The Princess Bride Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sisters Brothers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Macbeth (new classics) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For colored girls who have considered suicide/When the rainbow is enuf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wuthering Heights Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Robin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quite Nice and Fairly Accurate Good Omens Script Book: The Script Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Becoming Free Indeed: My Story of Disentangling Faith from Fear Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Importance of Being Earnest: A Play Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mash: A Novel About Three Army Doctors Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hamlet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unsheltered: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes: Revised and Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stories I Only Tell My Friends: An Autobiography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diamond Eye: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Storyworthy: Engage, Teach, Persuade, and Change Your Life through the Power of Storytelling Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Romeo and Juliet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Dolls House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Trial Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Town: A Play in Three Acts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Slave Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Count Of Monte Cristo (Unabridged) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lucky Dog Lessons: Train Your Dog in 7 Days Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of Sketch Comedy: A Journey through the Art and Craft of Humor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCoreyography: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Comedy Bible: From Stand-up to Sitcom--The Comedy Writer's Ultimate "How To" Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Life in Parts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Confessions of a Kept Man
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Confessions of a Kept Man - Jeffrey L. Carrier
© 2023 Jeffrey L. Carrier. All rights reserved.
No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted by any means without the written permission of the author.
Published by AuthorHouse 10/10/2023
ISBN: 979-8-8230-1213-3 (sc)
ISBN: 979-8-8230-1214-0 (e)
Library of Congress Control Number: 2023913802
Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Getty Images are models,
and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.
Certain stock imagery © Getty Images.
Cover design by Stephan Smith
Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in
this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views
expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.
Contents
Who Was Patsy Ruth Miller?
Patsy Ruth Miller and Me
Dedicate
d to
Marie Stamos & Gloria Jimenez
who worked hard to make the life of an old movie star comfortable
Photo.0.jpgPatsy Ruth Miller ~ January 17, 1904 - July 16, 1995
Who Was Patsy Ruth Miller?
I n 1922, if the average American man was asked to name his favorite female movie star, he would probably have said, without hesitation, Gloria Swanson or Mary Pickford or Lillian Gish. But maybe, just maybe, his answer might have been Patsy Ruth Miller. The 18-year-old native of St. Louis had made her film debut the previous year but had already been elevated to leading lady status at Goldwyn. By the end of that year, she had graced the screen in ten motion pictures.
If the reams of publicity during 1921 and 1922 about the young actress is any indication, Miss Miller was well on her way to becoming a star rivalling Swanson, Gish and even Pickford. She had great promise, according to the nation’s newspapers, but that promise was never quite fulfilled. Even though she did become one of the screen’s most popular players of the 1920s, she never became a top-flight star, and her career petered out during the first years of talking pictures.
Why did this pretty and talented actress not become one of the Great Stars? The answer, if there is one, may never be known or understood.
Patsy Ruth Miller made an auspicious film debut, supporting Nazimova in Camille, made for Metro in 1921. This was a long-anticipated production and attracted a great deal of attention when it was released, some of it not particularly flattering. But appearing in a Nazimova picture did no one’s career any harm. And for a novice like Miller, it was a great beginning.
The critics paid little attention to the newcomer however, devoting most of their column inches to Nazimova and Rudolph Valentino, who had the role of Armand, and criticizing the strange, avant-garde sets designed by Natacha Rambova. The film was a financial failure and effectively toppled Nazimova from her pinnacle of stardom. Seen today, it is Miss Miller whose acting seems the most refreshing and unaffected, especially in scenes with the histrionic Nazimova.
The critics may not have noticed her, but studio executives certainly did. She had no trouble getting work. Even before Camille was released, she had been signed for the ingenue role in Handle with Care, a Grace Darmond vehicle which was released in December of 1921. By that time, she had already been placed under contract to Goldwyn as part of their No Star
policy which the studio had adopted earlier that year.
According to an article published in the Grand Rapids Herald on April 23, 1922:
In carrying out that policy, Goldwyn has uncovered a whole bevy of mighty capable young men and women players. Cullen Landis is one product. Colleen Moore is another. And Patsy Ruth Miller is yet another. She’s a comely damsel who has been seen as a leading woman in a number of Goldwyn productions.
Apparently, Goldwyn was not interested in grooming its young contract players for stardom, but instead put them in films in which no one got star billing. The number of Goldwyn productions
referred to in the article totaled three. She and Cullen Landis were featured in all of them. Where is My Wandering Boy Tonight? and Watch Your Step had been released in February and Remembrance, written and directed by Rupert Hughes, was released in April. She had the feminine lead in all three and received good notices for her performances.
Colleen Moore, also mentioned in the article as a product of the No Star
policy, was not happy with her position at Goldwyn. She was ambitious and yearned for stardom.
I made several pictures for Goldwyn in 1921 and 1922,
she wrote in her 1968 autobiography, Silent Star, finally reaching the point where I was getting $1,000 a week, but as far as my future was concerned, I wasn’t getting anywhere. I couldn’t go on being a featured player. Either I became a star, or I would fall back and become a leading lady again.
It’s easy to understand how a young, ambitious actress would be frustrated working for the Goldwyn Studio. The salary Miss Moore mentions is another interesting point because, as reported by the Baltimore News on November 23, 1922, Patsy Ruth Miller was mighty glad to get $250 a week last year. Now she has $1,250 at the end of every seven days.
This would seem to indicate that, at the end of 1922, Patsy Ruth Miller was more valuable to the Goldwyn Studio than Colleen Moore.
Movie audiences saw a lot of Patsy Ruth Miller in 1922. In addition to the films made for her home studio, she was loaned to Fox as Tom Mix’s leading lady in two westerns, performed the same duty for Hoot Gibson in another western and supported Earle Williams in Fortune’s Mask, a Vitagraph production set below the border. Williams had been an enormously popular star before the First World War and still commanded a loyal following. His popularity certainly added to her screen exposure and reputation.
The western films, especially those with Mix, played an important part in the development of her career. Mix had a world-wide following and his films were box office gold.
Miss Miller’s final film of 1922 was a prestigious adaptation of the popular play, Omar the Tentmaker, made for First National, with stage star Guy Bates Post in the lead. The leading lady was Virginia Browne Faire, Miss Miller taking the supporting role of Little Shireen.
Boris Karloff was also a member of the cast.
Despite her end-of-the-year return to supporting roles, she had become a popular – and oft seen – leading lady. In film reviews, she was referred to as Goldwyn’s newest find,
an actress rapidly coming to the fore
or a refreshing new screen beauty.
Articles in fan magazines always commented on her beauty, her talent, her intelligence (she topped the list when an IQ test was administered to Goldwyn players) and, of course, her bright future. Oh yes, great things were expected of Patsy Ruth Miller. Take, for instance, this tidbit from the Sacramento Union on June 22, 1922:
This is to sing the praises of a few unsung toilers of the screen, to bestow recognition upon brows as yet unadorned by filmdom’s stellar diadem. Patsy Ruth Miller, Madge Bellamy, Mary Astor, Mary Philbin and Jacqueline Logan are young ladies whose cinema experience is limited, but for whom the light ahead burns brightly.
Stardom seemed just around the corner for the young actress, and no one expected it more than the exhibitors and publicists who voted her as one of the first WAMPAS Baby Stars. Conceived by members of the Western Association of Motion Picture Advertisers, the idea was to recognize those actresses who, during the past year, have shown the most talent and promise for stardom.
Young actresses and their agents yearned and schemed to be nominated and then chosen. As for publicity, in the twelve years that the WAMPAS Baby Stars flourished, the event attracted almost as much attention as the Academy Awards do today.
The first Baby Stars were announced in January of 1922 and presented, much like debutantes at a cotillion, on March 15th at the Ambassador Hotel. Patsy Ruth Miller was one of thirteen young ladies for whom stardom was predicted. The others were Marion Aye, Helen Ferguson, Lila Lee, Jacqueline Logan, Louise Lorraine, Bessie Love, Kathryn McGuire, Colleen Moore, Mary Philbin, Pauline Starke, Lois Wilson and Claire Windsor. Of that group, Colleen Moore reached the highest rung of stardom, with the others settling on various levels. Bessie Love had, by far, the longest career, making her last appearance on screen in 1983.
The selection committee was often very insightful in their predictions. Future Baby Stars included such young women as Mary Astor, Laura la Plante, Joan Crawford, Myrna Loy, Dolores Del Rio, Clara Bow, Janet Gaynor, Jean Arthur and Loretta Young.
Referred to as the Stars of Tomorrow
by the press, that first group was as described by Photoplay Magazine as a big bunch of rosebuds
when presented at the Ambassador. The article described what each actress was wearing, but