How Civility Works
()
About this ebook
Is civility dead? Americans ask this question every election season, but their concern is hardly limited to political campaigns. Doubts about civility regularly arise in just about every aspect of American public life. Rudeness runs rampant. Our news media is saturated with aggressive bluster and vitriol. Our digital platforms teem with trolls and expressions of disrespect. Reflecting these conditions, surveys show that a significant majority of Americans believe we are living in an age of unusual anger and discord. Everywhere we look, there seems to be conflict and hostility, with shared respect and consideration nowhere to be found. In a country that encourages thick skins and speaking one’s mind, is civility even possible, let alone desirable? In How Civility Works, Keith J. Bybee elegantly explores the “crisis” in civility, looking closely at how civility intertwines with our long history of boorish behavior and the ongoing quest for pleasant company. Bybee argues that the very features that make civility ineffective and undesirable also point to civility’s power and appeal. Can we all get along? If we live by the contradictions on which civility depends, then yes, we can, and yes, we should.
“[This] slim and artful treatise . . . suggest[s] we continue to fight for civility, but learn to think of it less romantically.” —The New York TimesBook Review
“Keith Bybee has delved into the literature of civility and emerged with a clear-eyed and helpful account of politesse. Let us bow.” —Henry Alford, author of Would It Kill You to Stop Doing That? A Modern Guide to Manners
“This important book shows us why pursuing [civility] is as necessary as it is difficult.” —John Inazu, Comment
Read more from Keith J. Bybee
How Civility Works Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMistaken Identity: The Supreme Court and the Politics of Minority Representation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to How Civility Works
Related ebooks
How Civility Works Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLynch-law; an investigation into the history of lynching in the United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLearning One’s Native Tongue: Citizenship, Contestation, and Conflict in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConfident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving through Deep Difference Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5American Mythos: Why Our Best Efforts to Be a Better Nation Fall Short Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Fighting Back the Right: Reclaiming America from the Attack on Reason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ruling Class Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReclaiming We: Twenty Everyday Acts to Strengthen the Common Good and Defend Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeeing Others: How Recognition Works—and How It Can Heal a Divided World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Troubled Birth: The 1930s and American Public Opinion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnd the Crooked Places Made Straight: The Struggle for Social Change in the 1960s Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Assault on Social Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Snake that Swallowed Its Tail Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChecking Progressive Privilege Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlessed Are the Organized: Grassroots Democracy in America Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the 21st Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCivil Rights: Rhetoric or Reality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Putting Liberalism in Its Place Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFor the People: A Citizen's Manifesto to Shaping Our Nation's Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Protest on Trial: The Seattle 7 Conspiracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Do Things with Emotions: The Morality of Anger and Shame across Cultures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5America and the Art of the Possible: Restoring National Vitality in an Age of Decay Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBefore the Shooting Begins Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Wealth and Justice: The Morality of Democratic Capitalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYou Can't Say That!: The Demise of Free Thought in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBarbarians inside the Gates and Other Controversial Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reclaiming Common Sense: Finding Truth in a Post-Truth World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Simple Wisdoms: Individuals and Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Essential Chomsky Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for How Civility Works
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
How Civility Works - Keith J. Bybee
1
THE PROMISE OF CIVILITY
Can we all get along?
In 1992 Rodney King plaintively posed this question in front of television news cameras after the police officers who had beaten him were acquitted and the streets of Los Angeles erupted in riots. The rampage lasted five days and in the end left over sixty people dead and one thousand buildings destroyed. King’s plea did not stop the rioting, but he did achieve a kind of fame, and the call for peaceful coexistence would follow him for the rest of his life. When he died, Can We All Get Along
was placed on his tombstone.
King spoke during a time of intense violence, but his question has a far broader resonance and can be asked of American society as a whole. We regularly experience episodes of turbulent protest. And beyond any particular instance of turmoil, we inhabit and sustain a contentious public culture. Our politics are preoccupied with the demonization of opponents. Our news media is saturated with aggressive bluster and vitriol. Our workplaces are rife with boorish behavior. Our digital platforms teem with expressions of disrespect and invective. Reflecting these conditions, surveys show that a significant majority of Americans believe we are living in an age of unusual anger and discord. A quarter of a century after King wondered whether we can get along, we find ourselves in a social world filled with conflict and hostility.
A host of authors and observers have diagnosed our malaise as a lack of civility and prescribed civility’s return as the cure. Americans once treated one another with far greater respect and consideration, the argument goes. If we can recover the traditionally courteous modes of relating to one another, we will find that our public life can be more restrained and peaceful. Political disagreements will remain, but new compromises will become possible as adversaries turn their attention away from maligning one another’s character and focus instead on scrutinizing competing policies. The news media will model civil engagement in its coverage, emphasizing fact-based analysis rather than sensationalizing conflict and relentlessly stoking animosities. Everyday exchanges between individuals—including those on social media, in website comment sections, and at work—will become more sociable, with substantially less tolerance for harassment and insult.
IS CIVILITY POSSIBLE OR DESIRABLE?
Many say that civility is quite important. But the standard argument for it rests on shaky foundations. To begin with, it is not clear how we can rely on a settled store of past courtesies to save us when there is in fact no period in the past when civility was fully established and secure from challenge.
It is true that many people today feel that civility has vanished, and true that the cause can be traced to contemporary factors like political polarization and the rise of the internet. Yet it is also true, as historians of civility have noted, that generations of Americans have felt threatened by escalating incivility and they had no trouble finding causes in their own time. At different points during the twentieth century, Americans chalked up the deterioration of public conduct to jazz music, World War I, the Great Depression, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights Movement, rock and roll, and the large-scale entry of women into the workforce. Nineteenth-century Americans blamed the Civil War, new immigrants, urban life, the vulgar rich, and the insolent poor. Talk of social crisis and fear of coarsening relations were also easy to find in the eighteenth century. James Madison along with many of our Founders complained about the truculence and crass materialism produced by the grasping, interest-ridden politics in the states. Given such a long history of rudeness, why should we believe that people are capable of getting along now?
In addition to this question of capacity there is also a question of motivation. The standard argument for civility begins with the assumption that our current ways of interacting are obviously dysfunctional and in need of repair. Yet instead of stipulating that we have failed, one could argue that our contentious public culture is a genuine accomplishment that we should wish to preserve.
For much of the modern era the courts have broadly interpreted the guarantees of the First Amendment. The result, as the Supreme Court noted in its landmark decision New York Times v. Sullivan, is that our public discussion has intentionally been kept uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.
Caustic critique, furious rants, and outright lies go largely unchecked by the Constitution to ensure that the greatest possible diversity of claims floods into the public sphere. Some views may seem too abrasive and offensive to endure. But as Justice Holmes observed almost one hundred years ago, when men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe, even more than they believe the very foundations of their own conduct, that the ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas—that the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market, and that truth is the only ground upon which their wishes safely can be carried out.
Nor does the value of untrammeled opinion stop with the discovery of truth and the exposure of injustice. Liberty of expression also allows for expansive