Right to Be Elected
()
About this ebook
What might happen if a woman’s right to vote is seen as coequal with her right to be elected?
Why are other countries so much better than the United States at electing women to office? In her lead essay in this anthology, Jennifer Piscopo argues that women in the United States haven’t fought for the right to be elected. A comparative political scientist, she shows that suffrage movements around the world often focused not only on the right to vote, but also the right to stand for office. As a result, when these movements succeeded, they saw the right to be elected as a positive right, enabling nationwide-efforts to both encourage and actively recruit female candidates. In her exploration of positive and negative rights in the United States, Piscopo explores what might happen if a woman’s right to vote is seen as coequal with her right to be elected, considering, among other things, how our definitions of representational government could both change and restore public trust in democracy.
Related to Right to Be Elected
Related ebooks
Resistance: How Women Saved Democracy from Donald Trump Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRunning as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe New Black: What Has Changed--and What Has Not--with Race in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPartisan Hostility and American Democracy: Explaining Political Divisions and When They Matter Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSuffrage: Women's Long Battle for the Vote Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Trump Wins in 2020: (With the Popular Vote) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFor the Many: American Feminists and the Global Fight for Democratic Equality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocratization and Women's Grassroots Movements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy Erodes from the Top: Leaders, Citizens, and the Challenge of Populism in Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Politics of Petulance: America in an Age of Immaturity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Troubled Birth: The 1930s and American Public Opinion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBad News: How Woke Media Is Undermining Democracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Woman Suffrage and Politics: The Inner Story of the Suffrage Movement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5US Politics in an Age of Uncertainty: Essays on a New Reality Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Summary of Tyranny of the Minority By Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt : Why American Democracy Reached the Breaking Point Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAfter the Protests Are Heard: Enacting Civic Engagement and Social Transformation Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/52016 Election and Beyond: What Did You Know? What You Need to Know: Educator’S Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Inflection Election: Democracy or Fascism in 2024? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWill China Democratize? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Against Democracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Perils of Populism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Obligation Mosaic: Race and Social Norms in US Political Participation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Two Americas: Our Current Political Deadlock and How to Break It Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrump And The Puritans Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Women Win: Emily's List and the Rise of Women in American Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thank You for Voting: The Maddening, Enlightening, Inspiring Truth About Voting in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How America’s Political Parties Change (and How They Don’t) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black Voters Mattered: A Philadelphia Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Controversial Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Prince Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Right to Be Elected
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Right to Be Elected - Jennifer Pispcopo, et al
THE RIGHT TO BE ELECTED
Editors-in-Chief Deborah Chasman & Joshua Cohen
Executive Editor Chloe Fox
Managing Editor and Arts Editor Adam McGee
Senior Editor Matt Lord
Engagement Editor Rosie Gillies
Contributing Editors Junot Díaz, Adom Getachew, Walter Johnson, Robin D.G. Kelley, Lenore Palladino
Contributing Arts Editors Ed Pavlić & Evie Shockley
Editorial Assistants Carl Denton & Aparna Gopalan
Marketing and Development Manager Dan Manchon
Finance Manager Anthony DeMusis III
Distributor The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England
Printer Sheridan PA
Board of Advisors Derek Schrier (chairman), Archon Fung, Deborah Fung, Alexandra Robert Gordon, Richard M. Locke, Jeff Mayersohn, Jennifer Moses, Scott Nielsen, Robert Pollin, Rob Reich, Hiram Samel, Kim Malone Scott
Interior Graphic Design Zak Jensen & Alex Camlin
Cover Design Alex Camlin
The Right to Be Elected is Boston Review Forum 14 (45.2)
To become a member, visit:
bostonreview.net/membership/
For questions about donations and major gifts,
contact: Dan Manchon, dan@bostonreview.net
For questions about memberships, call 877-406-2443 or email Customer_Service@bostonreview.info.
Boston Review
PO Box 425786
Cambridge, MA 02142
ISSN: 0734-2306 / ISBN: 978-1-946511-53-9
Authors retain copyright of their own work.
© 2020, Boston Critic, Inc.
Contents
Editors’ Note
Introduction
Forum
The Right To Be Elected
Forum Responses
Persuasion, Not Quotas
Changing Gendered Expectations
The Battle for Women's Representation Starts in Our Homes
Race Matters Too
Solutions Designed for the U.S. Political Context
The Electability Trap
Moving History Along
Essays
When Quotas Come Up Short
Dreaming of Democracy: Shirley Chisholm's Political Life
Save the ERA
Contributors
Editors’ Note
Deborah Chasman & Joshua Cohen
IN THIS DIFFICULT YEAR, we celebrate the hundredth anniversary of women's suffrage in the United States. Paying homage to the suffragists’ victory securing the right for women to vote, this volume pushes forward the conversation they started, exploring why women's representation in public office here has lagged so far behind other democracies.
Guest editors Jennifer M. Piscopo and Shauna L. Shames describe how suffrage movements around the world—from Europe to the relatively new democracies of Latin America—often focused not only on women's right to vote, but also the right to stand for office. When these movements succeeded, they embraced the right to be elected as a positive right, enabling nationwide efforts to encourage and actively recruit female candidates, often with quota systems for elected officials or party slates.
In the United States, why hasn't a woman's right to be elected been seen as coequal with her right to vote? And what if we took up the challenge of putting them on the same footing? Responding to Piscopo's forum essay, scholars and advocates of women's political participation consider U.S. culture, the political landscape, the interplay of race and gender, and different electoral strategies for women candidates. But they agree that democracy without women is not democracy.
Other essays in this volume explore a wide range of topics—whether women govern differently, the importance of Shirley Chisholm as a political figure, and the history of the ill-fated ERA.
The Right to Be Elected is not a history of women in politics, nor a primer on strategies to encourage more women to run for (and succeed in) political office. At its core, it simply asks what does gender equity in a democracy look like.
Introduction
Jennifer M. Piscopo & Shauna L. Shames
WHEN COVID-19 paralyzed the globe in April 2020, Donald Trump swaggered about the White House telling falsehoods while New Zealand's prime minister, Jacinda Ardern, held a special press conference to reassure the nation's children. Canny observers have noted that the places with low case numbers and more effective policy responses—from Germany to Taiwan—are led by women. It is no accident that these states are also strong and wealthy democracies, with capable bureaucracies and high levels of institutional trust. Though women leaders historically have governed countries both rich and poor, democratic and nondemocratic, today women head some of the world's most influential democracies.
In the United States, by contrast, presidential contender Elizabeth Warren made scant headway with her policy wonkiness, losing the Democratic Party nomination. Men's dominance of the country's highest political office will remain intact, even as many women chip away at the lower levels. In an iconic 2017 image of the Trump administration, an all-male, all-white group of Republican lawmakers discuss repealing the Affordable Care Act—including benefits for pregnancy and maternity care. The photo neatly captured the exclusionary politics that angered so many women. This exclusion—along with feelings of threat, urgency, and anger—drove a record number of women to run in the 2018 midterms. Two hundred and fifty-seven women (including an unprecedented number of women of color) contested races for the House and Senate, seventy-five more than in 2016.
This surge in women candidates was seen as a good thing
by 61 percent of Americans. Despite the sexism many women candidates still face, and the failure to elect a woman to the presidency, the U.S. public seems enthusiastic about having women in elected office. This preference echoes an increasingly global sentiment that women's political representation is key to the proper functioning of democracy. Around the globe, more women in office is associated with greater trust in government.
The converse is also true. Recently, Piscopo and colleagues Amanda Clayton and Diana Z. O’Brien showed that women's absence from government makes Americans view government as less democratic. When presented with the options of an all-male legislative committee and a gender-balanced committee, respondents perceived the manel
to be less fair, less trustworthy, and less legitimate. This preference held even when the manel wasn't deliberating on women's issues. Even Republicans and especially men preferred the gender-balanced panel. Despite our political polarization, it seems we can all agree that women's exclusion from decision-making bodies is undemocratic.
And yet, in the United States, which this year celebrates the centennial of women's suffrage, little attention has been paid to women's officeholding as a political right, not to mention the benefits that follow for society and politics. A nearly exclusive focus on voting rights leads to an unbalanced perspective about what constitutes democratic representation. By contrast, the Freedom House's Freedom in the World
ranking system includes both whether adult citizens enjoy universal and equal suffrage
and whether women are allowed to register and run as candidates.
Feminist scholars and women's movements across the globe have argued that women's absence from elected positions corrodes democracy. They challenge: Can democracy without women even be called democracy?
SCHOLARS HAVE TRADITIONALLY described democracy as something that unfolded in three distinct global waves. The so-called first wave of democracy—from the mid-nineteenth century to the years immediately following World War I—occurred when countries ended voting restrictions that affected lower-class men. Countries removed property and literacy restrictions on voting, but these changes only benefited men, and sometimes only men from the country's majority racial, ethnic, or religious group. After World War II, a second wave of democracy followed, which featured decolonization in Africa and Asia, as well as the expansion of women's suffrage. When the Soviet Union fell in 1989, it fueled a third wave of democratization, which engulfed not just Eastern Europe but also Latin America, as the region shed its military dictators and ended its civil wars. These changes were so dramatic that public intellectual Francis Fukuyama proclaimed the end of history: democracy was now