Radiological Warfare: Unseen Threats and Strategic Impacts of Nuclear Contamination
By Fouad Sabry
()
About this ebook
What is Radiological Warfare
Radiological warfare is any form of warfare involving deliberate radiation poisoning or contamination of an area with radiological sources.
How you will benefit
(I) Insights, and validations about the following topics:
Chapter 1: Radiological warfare
Chapter 2: Little Boy
Chapter 3: Nuclear weapon
Chapter 4: Nuclear fission
Chapter 5: Neutron bomb
Chapter 6: Nuclear fallout
Chapter 7: Dirty bomb
Chapter 8: Cobalt bomb
Chapter 9: Nuclear technology
Chapter 10: Nuclear weapon design
(II) Answering the public top questions about radiological warfare.
Who this book is for
Professionals, undergraduate and graduate students, enthusiasts, hobbyists, and those who want to go beyond basic knowledge or information for any kind of Radiological Warfare.
Related to Radiological Warfare
Titles in the series (100)
Attrition Warfare: The Science and Strategy of Sustained Combat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFault Line War: Fault Line War - Strategies of Modern Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLimited War: Limited War - Strategies and Implications in Modern Conflicts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInvasion: A Strategic Exploration of Modern Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExpeditionary Maneuver Warfare: Strategies and Tactics for Modern Combat Operations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsColonial War: Strategies and Tactics of Imperial Conquest Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUndeclared War: **Undeclared War: Covert Operations and Modern Warfare** Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar: War and the Science of Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInsurgency: Tactics and Strategies in Modern Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Warfare: Mastering Strategy and Tactics in Military Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTotal War: Total War: Strategies, Tactics, and Technologies of Modern Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEconomic Warfare: Strategies and Tactics in the Battle for Global Influence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIrregular Warfare: Tactics and Strategies for Modern Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnrestricted Submarine Warfare: Strategies, Tactics, and Consequences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn War: Strategic Principles for Modern Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRange War: Range War - Strategic Innovations in Modern Combat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsymmetric Warfare: **Asymmetric Warfare: Strategies and Implications for Modern Combat** Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExpeditionary Warfare: Strategies, Tactics, and Triumphs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManeuver Warfare: Strategies and Tactics for Modern Combat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCivil War: **Civil War: Strategic Dynamics and Battlefield Innovations** Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDefensive Warfare: Strategies, Tactics, and the Art of Defense in Modern Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlockade: Blockade: Strategic Encirclement and Military Tactics in Modern Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNational Liberation Wars: Strategies and Tactics in Revolutionary Conflicts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNarcoterrorism: The Interplay of Drugs and Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunist Terrorism: Understanding the Tactics and Threats Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPsychological Warfare: Strategies and Tactics in Modern Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerrorism: Terrorism in Modern Warfare and Strategic Defense Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConventional Warfare: Conventional Warfare - Strategies and Tactics in Modern Military Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFabian Strategy: Fabian Strategy - The Art of Deliberate Delay in Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReligious War: Religious War: Strategies and Tactics in Faith-Based Conflicts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
The History of Hydrogen Bomb and Why It Should Be Banned. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRocket Propellant Technology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Race for the Atomic Bomb: Scientists, Spies and Saboteurs – The Allies’ and Hitler’s Battle for the Ultimate Weapon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Warfare: Strategic Dominance and the Science of Catastrophic Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Annie Jacobsen’s Nuclear War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Peace Bomb Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The History of Nuclear War I: How Hiroshima and Nagasaki Were Devastated by Nuclear Weapons in August 1945. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar Winners Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhere's My Jetpack? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5World War 2 In Review No. 45 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAtomic Awakening Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5FOLLY of the HYDROGEN BOMB Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Nuclear War by Annie Jacobsen: A Scenario Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Keeping the Peace: The Aldermaston Story Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Landmines in War and Peace: From Their Origin to Present Day Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beam Weapons: Roots of Reagan's Star Wars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorld War 2 In Review Number 43 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sea Disposal of Chemical Weapons Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Military Utility Of German Rocketry During World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorldwide Effects of Nuclear War: Some Perspectives Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dynamite Stories, and Some Interesting Facts About Explosives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBomb Disposal in World War Two Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The New Norm Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBallistic Basics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hotter Than The Sun: Time To Abolish Nuclear Weapons Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Five Days in August: How World War II Became a Nuclear War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5High Explosives and Propellants Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Dark Sun: The Making Of The Hydrogen Bomb Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Public Policy For You
Chasing the Scream: The Inspiration for the Feature Film "The United States vs. Billie Holiday" Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dreamland: The True Tale of America's Opiate Epidemic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Mercy: a story of justice and redemption Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The People's Hospital: Hope and Peril in American Medicine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Price We Pay: What Broke American Health Care--and How to Fix It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bowling Alone: Revised and Updated: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Abolition of Sex: How the “Transgender” Agenda Harms Women and Girls Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Not Too Late: Changing the Climate Story from Despair to Possibility Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Capital in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5America: The Farewell Tour Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tell Your Children: The Truth About Marijuana, Mental Illness, and Violence Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Affluent Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5No Visible Bruises: What We Don’t Know About Domestic Violence Can Kill Us Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: or, How Capitalism Works--and How It Fails Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Facing Reality: Two Truths about Race in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nobody: Casualties of America's War on the Vulnerable, from Ferguson to Flint and Beyond Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How We Do Harm: A Doctor Breaks Ranks About Being Sick in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Least of Us: True Tales of America and Hope in the Time of Fentanyl and Meth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reefer Madness: Sex, Drugs, and Cheap Labor in the American Black Market Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Diary of a Psychosis: How Public Health Disgraced Itself During COVID Mania Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocial Security 101: From Medicare to Spousal Benefits, an Essential Primer on Government Retirement Aid Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for Radiological Warfare
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Radiological Warfare - Fouad Sabry
Chapter 1: Radiological warfare
Radiological warfare is any form of warfare involving the intentional poisoning or pollution of a region with radioactive materials.
Typically, radioactive weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), A salted bomb is a nuclear weapon containing a substantial amount of radiologically inert salting material. The radiological warfare agents are formed by the neutron capture of the nuclear weapon's neutron radiation by the salting materials. This eliminates the need to store highly radioactive material, as it is produced by the bomb's explosion. The resulting fallout is more intense than that of conventional nuclear weapons and can render a region uninhabitable for an extended length of time.
Neutron capture converts cobalt-59 to cobalt-60 in the cobalt bomb, which is an example of a radiological warfare weapon. Initially, the gamma radiation of nuclear fission products from an equivalently sized clean
fission-fusion-fission bomb is significantly more intense than cobalt-60: 15,000 times more intense at 1 hour, 35 times more intense at 1 week, 5 times more intense at 1 month, and almost equal at 6 months. The cobalt-60 fallout is eight times more intense than fission after one year and one hundred fifty times more intense after five years. After around 75 years, the extremely long-lived isotopes created by fission would once again surpass cobalt-60.
If the effects of thermal radiation and blast wave need to be maximized for an area, an air burst is chosen (i.e. formation of mach stem, and not shielded by terrain). Neutron radiation from both fission and fusion weapons will irradiate the detonation site, triggering neutron activation of the material there. Additionally, fission bombs will contribute to the bomb residue. Neutron activation of air will not produce isotopes relevant for radiological warfare. By detonating them at or near the surface, the ground will be evaporated, become radioactive, and generate substantial fallout as it cools and condenses into particles.
A dirty bomb
or radiological dispersal device, whose objective is to distribute radioactive dust across an area, is a radiological weapon of much lower technology than those previously mentioned. The release of radioactive material may not involve a unique weapon
or side effects like a blast explosion and may not directly kill people from its radiation source, but it might render entire areas or structures inhospitable to human life. Radioactive material may be slowly disseminated over a vast region, making it difficult for victims to initially recognize a radiological attack, especially if radioactivity detectors have not been set beforehand.
{End Chapter 1}
Chapter 2: Little Boy
Little Boy was the name of the atomic bomb used to destroy the Japanese city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, during World War II. It was the first nuclear weapon ever used in combat. The bomb was dropped by Colonel Paul W. Tibbets Jr., commander of the 509th Composite Group, and Captain Robert A. Lewis, pilots of the Boeing B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay. It exploded with the force of approximately 15 kilotons of TNT (63 TJ), causing significant destruction and fatalities throughout the city. The Hiroshima bombing was the second nuclear explosion caused by humans in history, following the Trinity nuclear test.
During World War II, Lieutenant Commander Francis Birch's team at the Manhattan Project's Los Alamos Laboratory redesigned their abandoned Thin Man nuclear bomb into Little Boy. It was a gun-type fission weapon, similar to Thin Man, but its explosive force was obtained from the nuclear fission of uranium-235, whereas Thin Man was based on plutonium-239. Fission was achieved by propelling a hollow cylinder (the bullet
) with nitrocellulose propellant powder at a solid cylinder of the same material (the target
). It had 64 kilograms (141 pounds) of highly enriched uranium, although less than one kilogram experienced nuclear fission. Its components were manufactured at three separate facilities so that no one would have a copy of the entire design. In contrast to the implosion design, which required complex coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was believed so likely to function that it was never tested before its initial deployment at Hiroshima.
After the end of the war, it was not anticipated that the ineffective Little Boy design would be used again, thus numerous drawings and designs were destroyed. Midway through 1946, the Hanford Site reactors began to suffer from the Wigner effect, the dislocation of atoms in a solid induced by neutron radiation, and plutonium became scarce; thus, Sandia Base manufactured six Little Boy assemblies. In 1947, the Navy Bureau of Ordnance produced an additional 25 Little Boy assemblies for use by the Lockheed P2V Neptune nuclear strike aircraft, which could be launched from aircraft carriers of the Midway-class. All Little Boy units were decommissioned at the end of January 1951.
During World War II, physicist Robert Serber dubbed the first two atomic bomb prototypes based on their shapes: Thin Man and Fat Man. The Thin Man
was a long, thin device whose name was derived from the Dashiell Hammett novel and film series of the same name. It was named after Kasper Gutman, a corpulent character in Dashiell Hammett's 1930 novel The Maltese Falcon, portrayed by Sydney Greenstreet in the 1941 film adaptation. Little Boy was given the name Thin Man by others as a reference to its design.
Since it was recognized that uranium-235 was fissionable, it was the first material pursued in the construction of the bomb. As the first design created (and the first to see battle), it is sometimes referred to as the Mark I.
Little Boy was a condensed version of Thin Man, The earlier design for gun-type fission weapons.
Thin Man, 17 foot (5.2 m) in length, intended to use plutonium, Therefore, it was also capable of employing enriched uranium.
After Emilio G.'s research, the Thin Man concept was abandoned.
Segrè and his P-5 Group at Los Alamos on the newly reactor-produced plutonium from Oak Ridge and the Hanford site showed that it contained impurities in the form of the isotope plutonium-240.
This has a significantly higher spontaneous fission rate and radioactivity than the cyclotron-produced plutonium used for the original observations, Moreover, its incorporation into reactor-produced plutonium (necessary for bomb production due to required amounts) appeared inevitable.
This indicated that the background fission rate of the plutonium was so high that it was extremely probable that the plutonium would self-detonate and explode upon the formation of a critical mass.
The Little Boy measured 120 inches (300 cm) in length, had a diameter of 28 inches (71 cm), and weighed around 4,500 kg (4,400 kg).
Following the gun principle, the uranium-235 inside the weapon was separated into two parts: the projectile
and the target.
The projectile was a hollow cylinder that accounted for sixty percent of its overall mass (38.5 kg [85 lb]). It consisted of a stack of nine uranium rings, each 6.25 inches (159 mm) in diameter with a 4-inch (100 mm) bore in the center and a total length of 7 inches (180 mm), pressed into the front end of a 16.25-inch (413-mm) long thin-walled projectile. Behind these rings, the remaining space in the projectile was filled by a tungsten carbide disc with a steel rear. The projectile slug was propelled 42 inches (1,100 mm) along the 72-inch (1,800 mm) long, 6.5-inch (170 mm) wide smooth-bore gun barrel upon ignition. The insert
for the slug was a 7-inch long, 4-inch diameter cylinder with a 1-inch (25 mm) axial hole. The projectile represented forty percent of the entire fissile mass (25.6 kg or 56 lb). The insert consisted of a stack of six washer-like uranium discs that were somewhat thicker than the projectile rings and slid over a 1-inch rod. This rod then protruded from the front of the bomb case after passing through the tungsten carbide tamper plug, impact-absorbing anvil, and nose plug backstop. This entire target assembly was secured with locknuts at both ends.
Every published description and illustration of the Little Boy mechanism for the first fifty years after 1945 thought that a small, solid bullet was shot into the middle of a bigger, stationary target. In Little Boy, however, critical mass considerations dictated that the larger, hollow piece would be the projectile. The built fissile core had uranium-235 in excess of two critical masses. This necessitated that one of the two components have a critical mass greater than one, with the bigger component avoiding criticality prior to assembly through form and little contact with the neutron-reflecting tungsten carbide tamper.
A hole in the center of the bigger piece scattered the mass and increased the surface area, allowing more fission neutrons to escape and so avoiding a chain reaction from occurring prematurely.
The fuzing device was meant to activate at the most devastating altitude, 580 meters according to calculations (1,900 ft). It utilized a three-level interlocking mechanism:
To safeguard the safety of the aircraft, a timer prevented the bomb from detonating until at least fifteen seconds after release, or one-fourth of the projected fall time. The timer was activated when the electrical pull-out plugs connecting it to the aircraft detached as the bomb detonated, switching it to its internal 24-volt battery and commencing the timer. At the end of 15 seconds, the bomb would be 3,600 feet (1,100 m) away from the aircraft, at which point the radar altimeters were activated and control was transferred to the barometric stage.
The barometer stage served to delay activation of the radar altimeter firing command circuit until approaching explosion altitude. As ambient air pressure increased during descent, a thin metallic membrane covering a vacuum chamber distorted gradually (a similar construction is still in use today in antique wall barometers). The barometric fuze was deemed insufficiently precise to detonate the bomb at the proper ignition height since local air pressure varied. When the bomb reached the intended height for this stage (reportedly 2,000 meters; 6,561.6 feet), the membrane closed a circuit and activated the radar altimeters. The barometer stage was introduced out of concern that external radar signals could prematurely ignite the bomb.
Multiple redundant radar altimeters were utilized to accurately determine the final altitude. When the altimeters detected the proper height, the firing switch closed, igniting the three BuOrd Mk15, Mod 1 Navy gun primers in the breech plug and detonating the charge consisting of four silk powder bags, each holding 2 pounds (0.9 kilograms) of WM slotted-tube cordite. This caused the uranium bullet to be propelled toward the opposite end of the gun barrel at a muzzle velocity of 300 meters per second (980 feet per second). The chain reaction began approximately 10 milliseconds later and lasted less than 1 microsecond. The radar altimeters were modified U.S. Army Air Corps APS-13 tail warning radars, often known as Archie,
which are typically used to warn a fighter pilot of an oncoming aircraft from behind.
The designations for the Little Boy pre-assemblies were L-1, L-2, L-3, L-4, L-5, L-6, L-7, and L-11. In test drops, L-1, L-2, L-5, and L-6 were consumed. On July 23, 1945, the first drop test was conducted with L-1. Colonel Paul W. Tibbets, commander of the 509th Composite Group, dropped it over the ocean near Tinian in order to test the radar altimeter aboard the B-29 subsequently dubbed Big Stink.
On July 24 and 25, the L-2 and L-5 units were used to conduct two further drop tests over the ocean in order to test all components. Both missions were piloted by Tibbets, but this time the bomber was the one that became known as Jabit. On July 29, L-6 was used as a dress rehearsal. Major Charles W. Sweeney flew the B-29 Next Objective to Iwo Jima, where emergency procedures for loading the bomb onto a reserve aircraft were performed. On July 31, this drill was repeated, but this time L-6 was reloaded onto a different B-29, Enola Gay, piloted by Tibbets, and a test