Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Battle: Strategic Warfare Tactics from Ancient to Modern Times
Battle: Strategic Warfare Tactics from Ancient to Modern Times
Battle: Strategic Warfare Tactics from Ancient to Modern Times
Ebook116 pages1 hour

Battle: Strategic Warfare Tactics from Ancient to Modern Times

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

What is Battle


A battle is an occurrence of combat in warfare between opposing military units of any number or size. A war usually consists of multiple battles. In general, a battle is a military engagement that is well defined in duration, area, and force commitment. An engagement with only limited commitment between the forces and without decisive results is sometimes called a skirmish.


How you will benefit


(I) Insights, and validations about the following topics:


Chapter 1: Battle


Chapter 2: Front line


Chapter 3: Infantry


Chapter 4: Military aircraft


Chapter 5: Combined arms


Chapter 6: Military


Chapter 7: Naval warfare


Chapter 8: Hit-and-run tactics


Chapter 9: Urban warfare


Chapter 10: Aerial warfare


(II) Answering the public top questions about battle.


Who this book is for


Professionals, undergraduate and graduate students, enthusiasts, hobbyists, and those who want to go beyond basic knowledge or information for any kind of Battle.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJun 1, 2024
Battle: Strategic Warfare Tactics from Ancient to Modern Times

Read more from Fouad Sabry

Related to Battle

Titles in the series (100)

View More

Related ebooks

Public Policy For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Battle

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Battle - Fouad Sabry

    Chapter 1: Battle

    A battle is a conflict that takes place in armed conflict between opposing military forces, regardless of their size or number. Typically, a war consists of numerous engagements. In general, a battle is a clearly defined military engagement in terms of time, space, and force commitment. Skirmishes are occasionally used to describe an interaction where there is little mutual commitment and no clear winner.

    Rarely, the term battle will also be used to describe a complete operational campaign, despite the fact that this usage substantially deviates from the term's usual or conventional definition. Typically, a protracted combat encounter in which one or both fighters shared the same tactics, materials, and strategic goals throughout the encounter is referred to as a battle when describing such campaigns. The Battle of the Atlantic, the Battle of Britain, and the Battle of Stalingrad, all of which took place during World War II, are some notable examples of this.

    Military strategy directs wars and military campaigns, whereas fights occur at an operational mobility level of preparation and execution. was how strategy worked.

    The word battle is a loanword from the Old French bataille, first recorded in 1297, from the Late Latin battualia, meaning exercise of soldiers and gladiators in fighting and fencing, from the Late Latin beat, which is also where the English word battery comes from via Middle English batri..

    With changes in the structure, employment, and technology of military forces, the definition of the conflict as a concept in military science has evolved. The ideal definition of a fight, according to English military historian John Keegan, is anything which happens between two armies leading to the moral then physical collapse of one or both of them, although the causes and results of battles are rarely so easily summed up. When a conflict lasts more than a week, it is frequently because of planning and is referred to as an operation. When one side is unable to retire from combat, the other may arrange, confront, or force a battle.

    A battle's main objective is always to accomplish a mission objective through the use of military force. When one of the opposing sides routs the other (i.e., forces it to withdraw or renders it militarily worthless for further combat operations) or annihilates the latter, resulting in their deaths or capture, the other is forced to renounce its purpose and surrender its forces. A conflict could result in a Pyrrhic triumph that eventually benefits the side that lost. A stalemate can happen in a battle if no solution is found. An insurgency frequently results from a disagreement where one side refuses to settle the issue through a frontal confrontation using conventional combat.

    The bulk of fights up until the 19th century were brief, with many only lasting a few hours. (The Battle of Gettysburg (1863) and the Battle of Nations (1813) were remarkable in that they lasted three days.) This was primarily because it was challenging to equip mobile forces or carry out night operations. Typically, siege warfare was used to extend a combat. The First World War in the 20th century saw a dramatic evolution of trench warfare with its siege-like characteristics, extending the length of fights to days and weeks. As a result, unit rotation became necessary to prevent combat weariness, with troops ideally not being in a theater of operations for more than a month.

    The term battle has been misused throughout military history to refer to nearly any magnitude of conflict, particularly by strategic forces with hundreds of thousands of soldiers that may be engaged in operations or one fight at a time (Battle of Leipzig) (Battle of Kursk). The area that a battle takes up is determined by the participants' weaponry. As in the instance of the Battle of Britain or the Battle of the Atlantic, a battle in this more general definition may be prolonged and take place over a vast geographic region. Battles were fought with the two sides within sight, if not actually within reach of one another, prior to the development of artillery and aviation. With the presence of the supporting units in the back areas, such as supplies, artillery, medical staff, etc., the depth of the battlefield has also expanded in modern warfare.

    Battles are made up of numerous little engagements, skirmishes, and individual combats, and the participants typically only see a small portion of the entire conflict. Few British infantry who went over the top on the first day of the Somme, July 1, 1916, would have anticipated that the battle would last five months. To the infantryman, there may be little to distinguish between combat as part of a minor raid or a big offensive, nor is it likely that he anticipates the future course of the battle. Some of the Allied infantry who had just handed the French a catastrophic defeat at the Battle of Waterloo fully anticipated having to engage in combat once more the following day (at the Battle of Wavre).

    In order to integrate and coordinate armed forces for the military theater of operations, including air, information, land, sea, and space, battlespace is a single strategic concept. It encompasses the surroundings, elements, and circumstances that need to be comprehended in order to use combat power, safeguard the force, or carry out the mission, such as hostile and ally armed forces, infrastructure, weather, topography, and the electromagnetic spectrum.

    The quantity and caliber of combatants and their equipment, the quality of the commanders' skill, and the terrain are some of the main factors that determine the outcome of battles. Armor and weapons can make the difference; on numerous times, armies have won by using more sophisticated weapons than their adversaries. An extreme instance occurred in the Battle of Omdurman, where an Anglo-Egyptian force using Maxim machine guns and artillery defeated a sizable army of Sudanese Mahdists armed in the conventional fashion.

    Simple weapons used in unconventional ways have occasionally been effective; Swiss pikemen won numerous battles by turning a normally defensive weapon into an aggressive one. Early in the 19th century, the Zulus acquired a new type of spear called the iklwa, which helped them defeat their enemies. Despite having inferior armaments, certain forces have still managed to win, as in the Scottish Independence Wars. The importance of disciplined troops is frequently higher; despite being vastly outnumbered, the Romans prevailed at the Battle of Alesia due to their better training.

    Terrain can also influence a battle. In countless battles, gaining high ground has been the primary strategy. An army that controls a high point forces the opposition to climb, wearing them out in the process. Areas of densely vegetated jungle and forest serve as force multipliers that are advantageous to weaker armies. The development of aircraft may have diminished the significance of topography in modern combat, but it still plays a crucial role in concealment, especially in guerilla warfare.

    An equally significant role is played by generals and commanders. Hannibal, Julius Caesar, Khalid ibn Walid, Subutai, and Napoleon Bonaparte were all accomplished generals whose armies occasionally enjoyed great success. An army with a greater morale than one that constantly questions its decisions is one that can confidently follow the orders of its leaders. The success of the British in the naval Battle of Trafalgar was attributed to Admiral Lord Nelson.

    On land, at sea, and in the air, battles can be waged. There have been naval fights since before the fifth century BC. Due to their later development, air conflicts have been much less frequent, with the Battle of Britain in 1940 serving as their most notable example. Since the Second World War, aviation support has become essential for victories on land or at

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1