Quantum physics, fibre theory: Gravitational force…Expansion, dark matter, time

By Patrice UGUET

Patrice Uguet is an independent researcher, engineer by trade. A true realist.


He looks for explanations and descriptions of still unexplained quantum phenomena.

We discover with great surprise and great pleasure what entanglement could actually mean.


He tries to rationally solve the EPR paradox and nonlocality.

A new fibre theory is slowly born, structured, logical, elegant.

He brings a new light to the current quantum physics notions that are vague or unexplained: the gravitational force, the expansion accelerating or dark matter.

His realistic description of time passing by is quite singular.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Publishroom
• Release date: Jun 21, 2024
• ISBN: 9782386250095

Book preview

Foreword

The reader’s attention is brought to the fact that this book was written by an independent researcher, who is not a physicist by trade.

There are bound to be many imprecisions in the text.

I apologise beforehand to physicists and ask that they please be lenient.

However, going past these few imprecisions and inaccuracies, we might just find a great and beautiful idea.

This book presents a theory. There have been no laboratory experiments conducted to prove any of it whatsoever.

Theories are born from a questioning mind.

Theories are built in order to explain known or unknown phenomena.

In the beginning, every theory is likely to be wrong or baseless.

In the beginning, we don’t know if the theory is right or wrong, but it has the merit of existing.

Theories can be born from intuition only.

Theories can bring monumental and tangible results without ever having been proven.

Theories can come with previsions which, if proven right, can prove the theory itself.

Theories can come with tangible proof that confirms the theories.

Chapter 1:

EPR paradox and nonlocality

1. What’s wrong with quantum physics?

The founding fathers of quantum physics have slowly discovered unexpected treasures, which were hard to understand and even harder to accept.

Einstein was the greatest discoverer of all time, because he managed to understand extremely complex natural phenomena, and expressed them plainly and simply.

The simplicity of his explanations is inversely proportional to the complexity of his studies’ subjects.

The best proof of this simplicity is his legendary E=mc² formula, which has been used by the whole world for more than 100 years and stated clearly that energy and mass are equivalent, since c is a constant.

Einstein also discovered that everything is relative and that things can change depending on where the observer stands.

He discovered that space could bend because of a mass.

He was also interested in the infinitely small.

He was one of those who discovered that matter is actually made of discrete particles and he understood that some phenomena we considered compact flows were actually made of grains of matter called quanta, which gave the phrase quantum physics.

Einstein always remained realistic in his thinking: his discoveries could always be explained with understandable considerations and analyses.

He believed that if a phenomenon was inexplicable or incomprehensible, it meant our knowledge of science wasn’t complete but that, as it would progress, science would be able to explain everything.

He never accepted philosophy or belief as a way to explain physical phenomena, or that said phenomena could be accepted without being explained.

Contrary to some of his peers, he never believed in that’s how it is and it works so there’s no use in trying to understand how.

Except that’s exactly what happened with Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli, Erwin Schrödigner and Werner Heisenberg’s Copenhagen interpretation.

With the success and positive results of the brand new quantum physics, the Copenhagen interpretation recruited more and more extremely talented people, who believed that there was no point in trying to explain some phenomena, and that proving their results was enough, rather than understanding them. Shut up and calculate.

This vision, which can be called non-realistic, slowly started prevailing.

This is a shame because, by becoming the norm, this school of thought stopped all realistic research and thwarted every attempt at explaining the new phenomena.

This got to the extent that all physicists stopped looking for realistic explanations to quantum phenomena and settled for it is how it is.

Of course, Einstein held on to his belief that everything had to have an explanation and that if it didn’t, it meant science wasn’t advanced enough to find it.

He was never against the results and discoveries of quantum physics, on the contrary he participated in them, but he tried to explain everything.

He put his faith in realism.

This opposition between Einstein and Niels Bohr occupied the early days of quantum physics for a long while.

This quarrel of ideas gave us some famous sentences, such as Einstein’s God does not play dice and Bohr’s reply Einstein, stop telling God what to do.

Through his entire life, Einstein never stopped looking for explanations to quantum phenomena, in particular to what was called nonlocality.

Because of Niels Bohr and the Copenhagen’s interpretation, we stopped looking for the true nature of quantum physics and its components, such as photons and electrons.

Probably being