6 min listen
What the SCOTUS EPA ruling means for climate change
FromPOLITICO Energy
ratings:
Length:
11 minutes
Released:
Jul 1, 2022
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
On Thursday, the Supreme Court delivered a major setback to President
Joe Biden’s ambitious climate goals, ruling in a 6-3 decision that the
Environmental Protection Agency does not have the broad authority to
curb planet-warming pollution from power plants. POLITICO’s Alex Guillén
explains how this ruling creates a significant obstacle to Biden’s hopes
of addressing global warming and could raise questions about the
authority of other federal agencies.
Josh Siegel is an energy reporter for POLITICO.
Alex Guillén is an energy reporter for POLITICO Pro.
Nirmal Mulaikal is a POLITICO audio host-producer.
Raghu Manavalan is a senior editor for POLITICO audio.
Jenny Ament is the executive producer of POLITICO’s audio department.
Joe Biden’s ambitious climate goals, ruling in a 6-3 decision that the
Environmental Protection Agency does not have the broad authority to
curb planet-warming pollution from power plants. POLITICO’s Alex Guillén
explains how this ruling creates a significant obstacle to Biden’s hopes
of addressing global warming and could raise questions about the
authority of other federal agencies.
Josh Siegel is an energy reporter for POLITICO.
Alex Guillén is an energy reporter for POLITICO Pro.
Nirmal Mulaikal is a POLITICO audio host-producer.
Raghu Manavalan is a senior editor for POLITICO audio.
Jenny Ament is the executive producer of POLITICO’s audio department.
Released:
Jul 1, 2022
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
Producers question effort to boost low-methane fuel sales: FERC is reviewing a proposal that aims to encourage natural gas producers to trade and transport responsibly sourced natural gas. But producers are worried it could create uneven standards and empower an unnecessary gatekeeper. POLITICO’s Catherine Morehouse explains. by POLITICO Energy