Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

66: Is Incrementalism Enough to Fix the Criminal Legal System w/Jeff Blackburn

66: Is Incrementalism Enough to Fix the Criminal Legal System w/Jeff Blackburn

FromPublic Defenseless


66: Is Incrementalism Enough to Fix the Criminal Legal System w/Jeff Blackburn

FromPublic Defenseless

ratings:
Length:
77 minutes
Released:
Nov 16, 2022
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

Can people incarcerated afford to wait for small, gradual change? What happens to the people incarcerated if the system breaks? What is the right balance between the needs of the current case vs the needs of the future case? How do Public Defenders counter the decades long strategy of the Conservative legal movement with their own strategy? All these questions, and more, are pondered by Hunter and his guest today, Jeff Blackburn. During his career, Jeff worked as a criminal defense attorney, impact litigation lawyer and helped to found and operate the Texas Innocence Project. Through it all, Jeff’s aimed to foster and execute a strategic vision for indigent defense and civil liberties that counter’s the work of prosecutors and police. In his eyes, public defenders and other justice minded individuals are in the conflict business and the must learn to value the future battles as much as the current ones. To fail to do so will leave them fighting a battle against an enemy that already made the fight unwinnable, but what is the right balance? Hopefully, this discussion and the myriad of questions that arise from it will spark your own thinking about how to move towards more strategic levels of thinking. Guest: Jeff Blackburn, Criminal defense and Impact attorney, Co-Founder, Texas Innocence Project Key Takeaways: Jeff’s career [8:30] What is impact litigation [16:24] Victory in the Tulia Case and the Lesson’s learned from it [17:20] The Texas Innocence Project [21:54] Impacts of the Tim Cole Case [26:00] Learning strategy from the history NAACP Legal Fund [28:30] Countering the Conservative Legal Movement [33:38] Is Incrementalism Enough [38:30] How to balance current case vs future case [46:00] The structural/historical obstacles in many state [53:20] What happens if the system breaks [57:40] Is education the way to solve this [1:01:00] The case for hope [1:10:00]   Resources: Tulia Case: https://www.aclu.org/other/racist-arrests-tulia-texas https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2002-04-19/85638/ https://www.myplainview.com/news/article/5-million-settlement-reached-in-Tulia-lawsuit-8757623.php https://www.salon.com/2003/04/09/tulia_2/ Tim Cole’s Case https://innocenceproject.org/cases/timothy-cole/ Jeff Calling out Dallas’ Wrongful Conviction Issues https://innocenceproject.org/deconstructing-dallas-the-county-with-more-dna-exonerations-than-any-other/ Why Jeff Left the Innocence Project https://www.sacurrent.com/news/texas-innocence-project-founder-quits-accuses-colleagues-of-selling-out-2440927 More of Jeff’s Work austinchronicle.com/news/2008-04-04/608555/     Contact Hunter Parnell:   hwparnell@publicdefenseless.com   Instagram   Twitter   www.publicdefenseless.com  
Released:
Nov 16, 2022
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Anyone paying attention can tell you that our criminal legal system is perpetuating cruelty and harm, but the complexity of the legal world overwhelms most people simply trying to get through another day. Public Defenseless explores the rot in the justice system and what we can do about it. Join host, Hunter Parnell, as he interviews top defense attorneys and criminal justice stakeholders from across the country as they pull apart the convoluted web of our criminal justice system. Like so many of you, Hunter is not an attorney, simply tired of a news cycle and talking heads that offer no real solutions to the ever-growing list of problems we face. Hunter hopes that with this information, you will share his belief that ordinary people still can make a difference.