Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 217 - Cross-Examining Expert Witnesses

The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 217 - Cross-Examining Expert Witnesses

FromThe Litigation Psychology Podcast


The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 217 - Cross-Examining Expert Witnesses

FromThe Litigation Psychology Podcast

ratings:
Length:
42 minutes
Released:
Jun 3, 2024
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

Holly Howanitz, Managing Partner, Tyson & Mendes joins Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. to talk about cross-examination of expert witnesses. Holly highlights that you need think about your goals when cross-examining expert witnesses especially since experts often have more experience testifying than a fact witness. Bill and Holly talk about strategic decisions such as when to bring up "bombs" for the expert either at deposition or at trial and how to approach preparing for cross-examining an expert. Holly shares how she prepares for an arrogant expert or an expert that does primarily work for the plaintiff's side. Bill and Holly also talk about preparing experts for the defense and what that process is like. Watch the video of this episode: https://www.courtroomsciences.com/r/fO6
Released:
Jun 3, 2024
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

The Litigation Psychology Podcast presented by Courtroom Sciences, Inc. (CSI) is for in-house and outside defense counsel about the intersection of science and litigation. We explore topics of interest to the defense bar, with a particular emphasis on subjects that don‘t get enough attention. Our hosts are Ph.D.-level Social Scientists, Clinical Scientists, and Psychology Experts with a wealth of knowledge about science, research, human behavior, and decision making, which they apply in the context of civil litigation.